Message from discussion
Florence Bessie Weler
Received: by 10.210.16.11 with SMTP id 11mr209783ebp.13.1243541160318;
Thu, 28 May 2009 13:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <lavabre...@googlemail.com>
Received: from mail-ew0-f179.google.com (mail-ew0-f179.google.com [209.85.219.179])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16si74879ewy.7.2009.05.28.13.05.59;
Thu, 28 May 2009 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lavabre...@googlemail.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.179;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lavabre...@googlemail.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lavabre...@googlemail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@googlemail.com
Received: by mail-ew0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 27so5807741ewy.5
for <wellerfamily@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 28 May 2009 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=yGQI8mg02U3CJH06Ud+xhbsdOeu4/SwlAKPP057zES8=;
b=dhXojrAjBwkl96KuSzpnjXRvBd7kQVbFjC1w60NVWckdB451q6jTl3MJ4EGovbIbi6
vWWtPFkSGAhvt2sptaSVbDYZWHJlEL6om53lR6lhnZCsv2YUOGluk0YoptRVbtP0sdm+
JsQl+I1TEqPPpLKyraADglvLV7FLP9nPOHvyE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=dTkN6PJFGq3WrP4XZb9zn18jmy9a59eEuryURadyjS/rck5unBIhR50rAolu5LieS0
SsVOxupDPrQPutIpDXnOon//o4URrz3Pvww4h5Z9ryKntuVP/qwrs0TMZqi3UKFoc2VL
mf2bd1jkwvtnD45HIokJQIg32kpDFgnTDJz7k=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="0016367b6e30f9e500046afe7c2e"
Received: by 10.216.46.79 with SMTP id q57mr632020web.212.1243541157831; Thu,
28 May 2009 13:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <70b067c9-eaf5-45de-9088-214bc4b53d23@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
References: <5082b912-2950-4105-8f5a-ef4f094f4...@k2g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
<70b067c9-eaf5-45de-9088-214bc4b53...@z5g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:05:57 +0100
Message-ID: <347be060905281305j4c7ebb67m7facaa22d120c...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Florence Bessie Weler
From: iohannes lavabre <lavabre...@googlemail.com>
To: wellerfamily@googlegroups.com
--0016367b6e30f9e500046afe7c2e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thank you for that Richard. Afraid I don't get back to Oxfordshire much
these days. If I get the chance I might call into the Oxfordshire Archives.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Richard Weller <meg...@talktalk.net>wrote:
>
> John,
>
> In order to search the Berrick Salome parish registers themselves, I
> think you would need to go to the Oxfordshire Archives. I am assuming
> you are in UK. Check before you go that they do indeed have them, and
> you would probably need to make an appointment. Details
> www.oxfordshire.gov.uk.
> (The Berrick PRs will be part of the Oxford Diocesan Archives, which
> may possibly be deposited elsewhere.)
>
> Alternatively, you can search microfilm/microfiche copies of the same
> parish registers by ordering them from your nearest Family History
> Centre of the Church of Latter-day Saints (i.e Mormons) anywhere in
> the world. Details: www.familyseach.org
>
> It is also possible to search the LDS transcripts (known as the IGI,
> International Genealogical Index) online, but only baptisms and some
> marriages, but not burials. (Not all parishes have had their
> registers copied.) Again: www.familysearch.org. You need to know the
> batch reference number. For instance, if you enter 'Florence Weller'
> and 'Birth/Baptism' and '1874 +/- 2 years' you will find she was
> daughter of Jonathan & Mary and batch no. U000326. If you then ask
> for all Weller entries in that batch you will find five others. Then
> enter 'Jonathan Weller' 1845 +/- 10 years and you will see he was
> baptised 20 May 1842 and son of Thomas and Sophie, batch no. C024291.
> Do the same with that number. And so on back to Richard in 1542. Be
> aware that the IGI is not 100% reliable. Parish Register transcripts
> are usually accurate, but any submissions from individuals should be
> treated as no more than a guide, to be checked by searching the actual
> records.
>
> Happy Hunting!
>
> Finally, I am sure Malcolm would welcome details of all the family
> that are not already included on his WELLER Family website.
>
> Richard
> >
>
--0016367b6e30f9e500046afe7c2e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you for that Richard. Afraid I don't get back to Oxfordshire much=
these days.=A0If I get the chance I might call into the Oxfordshire Archiv=
es.=A0<br><br>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Richard Weller=
<span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:meg...@talktalk.net">megric@talkta=
lk.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br>John,<br><br>In order to sea=
rch the Berrick Salome parish registers themselves, I<br>think you would ne=
ed to go to the Oxfordshire Archives. =A0I am assuming<br>
you are in UK. Check before you go that they do indeed have them, and<br>yo=
u would probably need to make an appointment. =A0Details <a href=3D"http://=
www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/" target=3D"_blank">www.oxfordshire.gov.uk</a>.<br>(=
The Berrick PRs will be part of the Oxford Diocesan Archives, which<br>
may possibly be deposited elsewhere.)<br><br>Alternatively, you can search =
microfilm/microfiche copies of the same<br>parish registers by ordering the=
m from your nearest Family History<br>Centre of the Church of Latter-day Sa=
ints (i.e Mormons) anywhere in<br>
the world. =A0Details: <a href=3D"http://www.familyseach.org/" target=3D"_b=
lank">www.familyseach.org</a><br><br>It is also possible to search the LDS =
transcripts (known as the IGI,<br>International Genealogical Index) online,=
but only baptisms and some<br>
marriages, but not burials. =A0(Not all parishes have had their<br>register=
s copied.) =A0Again: <a href=3D"http://www.familysearch.org/" target=3D"_bl=
ank">www.familysearch.org</a>. You need to know the<br>batch reference numb=
er. =A0For instance, if you enter 'Florence Weller'<br>
and 'Birth/Baptism' and '1874 +/- 2 years' you will find sh=
e was<br>daughter of Jonathan & Mary and batch no. U000326. =A0If you t=
hen ask<br>for all Weller entries in that batch you will find five others. =
=A0Then<br>
enter 'Jonathan Weller' 1845 +/- 10 years and you will see he was<b=
r>baptised 20 May 1842 and son of Thomas and Sophie, batch no. C024291.<br>=
Do the same with that number. And so on back to Richard in 1542. =A0Be<br>
aware that the IGI is not 100% reliable. =A0Parish Register transcripts<br>=
are usually accurate, but any submissions from individuals should be<br>tre=
ated as no more than a guide, to be checked by searching the actual<br>reco=
rds.<br>
<br>Happy Hunting!<br><br>Finally, I am sure Malcolm would welcome details =
of all the family<br>that are not already included on his WELLER Family web=
site.<br><font color=3D"#888888"><br>Richard<br></font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class=3D"h5">
--0016367b6e30f9e500046afe7c2e--