I just tried an experiment using VPEC-T together with a second lens.
The second lens in this instance was RSI, which stands for Real-
Symbolic-Imaginary. I wanted to try using this lens to help me think
about Meaning.
What I found was that using the two lenses together gave me a whole
set of additional insights on a complex problem.
I like the use of two lenses and see this as a good example of a VPEC-
T MEANING Use Pattern. To bring this further to life and complete the
Use Pattern, what would you see as the outcomes of this analysis and
how is it different/better than other approaches? Is there an anti-
pattern?
This has prompted me to think of a similar TRANSFORMATION Use Pattern
where the Columns would be AS-IS, TO-BE and TRANSFORM. The outcome
might be a set of guiding principles, risks. I need to think about how
this might differ and what the anti-pattern is. Any ideas?
On Sep 30, 4:52 pm, Richard Veryard <goo...@veryard.com> wrote:
> I just tried an experiment using VPEC-T together with a second lens.
> The second lens in this instance was RSI, which stands for Real-
> Symbolic-Imaginary. I wanted to try using this lens to help me think
> about Meaning.
> What I found was that using the two lenses together gave me a whole
> set of additional insights on a complex problem.
I also like the TRANSFORMATION use pattern, but could I suggest a
slight refinement of the three columns: AS-IS, TO-BE and TIME-TO-
CHANGE. TIME-TO-CHANGE allows us to think about the decision/
hesitation, the haste/delay, as well as the natural evolutionary and
learning processes associated with change.
Not sure what you mean by an anti-pattern in this context.
Re:Anti-pattern - A way we might've tried to achieve the same result
in the past or 'Bad Habit' that we're in that has proven to not work.
I like the added column to TRANSFORMATION. Could we start to build a
Use Pattern repository somewhere - could this be a service of the Next
Practice Institute?
n.
On Oct 1, 8:48 am, Richard Veryard <goo...@veryard.com> wrote:
> I also like the TRANSFORMATION use pattern, but could I suggest a
> slight refinement of the three columns: AS-IS, TO-BE and TIME-TO-
> CHANGE. TIME-TO-CHANGE allows us to think about the decision/
> hesitation, the haste/delay, as well as the natural evolutionary and
> learning processes associated with change.
> Not sure what you mean by an anti-pattern in this context.
|
