Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Unlucky?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  19 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Lescor  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 14:03
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:03:13 -0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 14:03
Subject: Unlucky?
Those unstructured, 'loose ball bouncing around in the area' type goals
are a bit unlucky  when the  opponents get the best of the breaks and
score. But Liverpool  have pulled off a few very late results with similar
in the past ,as have all sides.

They should have won the game if decent chances mean anything.
They played about as well as I  expected this side to play, plenty of
effort, not much finesse, lots of square cross field passes from
the midfield.

Can they get through? Lyon would have to win that away game in
Italy, but, having now qualified and judging by the way they played,
 last night, it looks unlikely.  But, who knows? The master tactician
of Europe has once before needed his players to overcome his
Euro selection blunders and win 3 from 3. Now it's just 2 from 2
and hope!  But....Rafa has been extremely fortunate in Europe
in the past. Possibly his luck has run out?

The team they played last night now tops the group. A decent side,
but it really reflects on how simple it should have been for a L'pool
side of any reasonable quality to sail through to the last 16.
And I still find Benitez's selections bewildering, particularly his
choice of a starting partner for Torres..

Even Babel,( who had the ball  about 6 times after he came on
and only did one thing right) would have made more sense.

So........ unlikely that all 4 English sides will go though, but there
is always a bright spot. After last nights final result we are at least
spared all those idiotic posts about how fantastic a tactician
Rafa is in bringing on the scorer.

Great goal though!

LC


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
chuck-spears  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 18:20
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...@hotmail.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:20:57 -0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 18:20
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com> wrote in message

news:RNadnRwBnuC8Rm_XnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com...

    You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less guarenteed
reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Beta User  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 18:41
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: Google Beta User <wanyik...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 18:41
Subject: Re: Unlucky?
On Nov 5, 1:20 pm, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>     You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less guarenteed
> reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

Real Madrid are not guaranteed either, looking dicey for them.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rocket Head  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 19:05
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Rocket Head" <Eejits...@eejitheadltd.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:05:53 -0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 19:05
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

>    You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less
> guarenteed reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

Not so long ago Utd finished bottom and crashed out at this stage, were they
big enough?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
SteveH  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 19:31
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: st...@italiancar.co.uk (SteveH)
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:31:40 +0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 19:31
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

Rocket Head <Eejits...@eejitheadltd.com> wrote:

> >    You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less
> > guarenteed reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

> Not so long ago Utd finished bottom and crashed out at this stage, were they
> big enough?

We were shit that year and quite rightly slated the side for it, whilst
you lot told us that big teams always got through.

--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
Alfa 156 TSpark Sportwagon Veloce Selespeed - Alfa 75 TSpark Lusso -
Ducati 750SS - BMW R100RT - Toyota Prius T-Spirit


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
JN Andersen  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 19:44
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "JN Andersen" <justj...@stofanet.dk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:44:34 +0100
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 19:44
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Google Beta User" <wanyik...@gmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:476d19ca-be42-45f2-85be-84ee06ab6512@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

> On Nov 5, 1:20 pm, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>>     You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less
>> guarenteed
>> reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

> Real Madrid are not guaranteed either, looking dicey for them.

Not really. They'll beat Zürich at home and AC Milan will beat Marseille at
home. Job done

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
JN Andersen  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 19:47
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "JN Andersen" <justj...@stofanet.dk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:47:35 +0100
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 19:47
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...@hotmail.co.uk> skrev i meddelelsen
news:cIEIm.43149$%%3.20003@newsfe23.ams2...

The big teams are given an easy ride into the ko stages. However they of
course still have to turn up and win those games needed.

But of course you'll get knocked out if you are piss poor for 6 games no
matter who you are.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Legend11  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 21:54
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: Legend11 <Slithee...@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:54:47 +0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 21:54
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

JN Andersen wrote:

> "Google Beta User" <wanyik...@gmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:476d19ca-be42-45f2-85be-84ee06ab6512@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>> On Nov 5, 1:20 pm, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>>>     You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less
>>> guarenteed
>>> reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

>> Real Madrid are not guaranteed either, looking dicey for them.

> Not really. They'll beat Zürich at home and AC Milan will beat Marseilles
> at home. Job done

Yep...the big teams always get through. Chuckle...snigger...etc.

--
Legend11
Manchester United - Premiership Champions Three Times Running.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lescor  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 6 Nov, 03:09
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:09:49 -0000
Local: Fri 6 Nov 2009 03:09
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message

news:cIEIm.43149$%%3.20003@newsfe23.ams2...

This obviously comes with the assumption that these "big teams"  have the
appropriate good squads. It is not quite always the case and occasionally
one of them will fail, as I think Man U did a few seasons back?
But this is an exception. Arsenal are just about certain and Man U and
Chelsea are already there with 2 still to play., a typical situation which
just
about sums up the artificiality of this method.  Apart from the useful cash,
none of these sides really need 2 meaningless games  in the middle of
a busy season.  Meaningless?....oh no!  In order to keep some late
interest in those leagues, UEFA  have that mini seeding which says
that top teams will not be matched for the first last 16 legs, although  we
all know that meeting a side which finished second can be a stiffer task.

Liverpool not big enough?  Big club insofar as being regulars in the top
handful of the EPL.  Big team?.....certainly not.

LC


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lescor  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 6 Nov, 03:15
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 03:15:19 -0000
Local: Fri 6 Nov 2009 03:15
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"SteveH" <st...@italiancar.co.uk> wrote in message

news:1j8q3jk.1y8e8e5kp3qyoN%steve@italiancar.co.uk...

> Rocket Head <Eejits...@eejitheadltd.com> wrote:

>> >    You are always telling us that the big teams are more or less
>> > guarenteed reaching the knockout stages, are Liverpool not big enough?

>> Not so long ago Utd finished bottom and crashed out at this stage, were
>> they
>> big enough?

> We were shit that year and quite rightly slated the side for it, whilst
> you lot told us that big teams always got through.

Big clubs get through most times because they have big teams, or, if you
prefer, good squads. But not always, although the exceptions are rare.

LC


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ren  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 03:52
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:52:40 -0500
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 03:52
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com> wrote in message

news:RNadnRwBnuC8Rm_XnZ2dnUVZ8vqdnZ2d@bt.com...

Pathetic Les, truely pathetic.

I understand you being upset at the goal Luis Garcia scored but to make it a
mission of your life to assasinate Rafael Benitez is sad.

Of course you will deny this, but when have you ever become so embroiled in
football newsgroups? Since Liverpool won the EC in 2005? newsnet google says
that is correct. We all know you are a Chelsea fan, i've known that since
the days when you used to post on the horseracing newsgroup.

Christ a team goes through a tough time and you follow them like a swine flu
epidemic.........not like Arsenal of the past few years who have won nothing
but played "beautiful football" in handful of games whilst being out of the
running by december........Arsene Wengers criticism shield must be
indestructible........right?

Listen, give it a fucking break. Comment again at the end of the season,
when your point may have an actual point..

Ren


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Beta User  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 05:24
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: Google Beta User <wanyik...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 05:24
Subject: Re: Unlucky?
On Nov 6, 10:52 pm, "Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote:

> Christ a team goes through a tough time and you follow them like a swine flu
> epidemic.........not like Arsenal of the past few years who have won nothing
> but played "beautiful football" in handful of games whilst being out of the
> running by december........Arsene Wengers criticism shield must be
> indestructible........right?

But he's won league titles and european trophies which Benitez has
never.  Oh, wait...

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
JN Andersen  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 10:12
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "JN Andersen" <justj...@stofanet.dk>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:12:13 +0100
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 10:12
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Google Beta User" <wanyik...@gmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:9e35bafe-37f7-4cea-be3c-4d3a7823cf74@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...

> On Nov 6, 10:52 pm, "Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote:

>> Christ a team goes through a tough time and you follow them like a swine
>> flu
>> epidemic.........not like Arsenal of the past few years who have won
>> nothing
>> but played "beautiful football" in handful of games whilst being out of
>> the
>> running by december........Arsene Wengers criticism shield must be
>> indestructible........right?

> But he's won league titles and european trophies which Benitez has
> never.  Oh, wait...

The difference is that at Arsenal everyone has been realistic. They have
planned long term and knew they needed to build the Emirates to compete in
the long run. At the same time accepting that the investment in the new
stadium would mean that transfer funds were limited for a number of years.
Everyone accepted that they might not win anything for a while and just
focused on CL qualification. That time is just about over and soon Arsenal
will judged by trophies again.

At Liverpool there is no sign of a new stadium and Liverpool will be left
behind financially for years to come. There is no realism, there is no long
term planning...and no trophies either. It seems like too many people feel
you are entitled to win something because you are the mighty Liverpool and
if you just manage to field 11 players in a red shirt, the rest will come by
itself.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Redman  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 10:32
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Redman" <redman1...@btinternet.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:32:18 -0000
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 10:32
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote in message

news:ea6Jm.11177$X01.1108@newsfe07.iad...

Spot on Ren, the guy's a fucking tool. Even when other teams in the top 4
are doing badly he never does a hatchet job on them, it's always about Rafa.

Redman


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lescor  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 12:23
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:23:26 -0000
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 12:23
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote in message

news:ea6Jm.11177$X01.1108@newsfe07.iad...

Just to put you straight mate, My football newsgroup comments started
after I discovered  that such things existed, which was a few months after
I got a computer and learned how to use it.
If you really  want to look at Google, you will find that my comments in
other groups have bought the accusations, if that is the right word, of
 mostly being a L'pool fan in the MU group after many long posts regarding
that club, and, very often a Man U fan here, along with being a fan of both
in other groups at various times.

The reason for this is that others, maybe with good reason, think that
any adverse comment has to be from a supporter of some other club.
My comments on Wenger in the past ( which you have obviously
missed)  bought the same assumptions.  I admit that I am not always
completely impartial in my liking for teams which, for various reasons
I would like to do well for a while, like Burnley this season, but that does
not make me a supporter in the accepted sense of the word.

I certainly wanted Chelsea to do well because, as I said at the time,
I liked the attitude of their manager and, like many others, I was
absolutely pissed off with almost a decade of Arsenal/ Man U or
Man U/Arsenal seasons in the EPL. Did that make me a fan when
I would have been just as pleased if the Russian had backed Spurs
or Man City or Birmingham?

The reason that I rarely post in the Chelsea group is that there is nobody
at home to reply. About 12 football posts per month is hardly lively.

My comments on L'pool started after their amazing win in the CL final, as
you will probably remember. I posted to add my congratulations and thoughts
after that  game and was amazed at the amount of credit  being heaped
upon Benitez who, to me,  came out of the game with far less credit than
his players after his first half dithering. I was almost alone in saying
that
Benitez had much to prove, the rest were treating him as a genius.

So started a long exchange, simply because my opinion of Rafa was so
different from the Pool fans. Nothing else!  No anti Liverpool bias. No
deep dislike of Rafa.  My arguments were not with him, they were with
those blindly hopeful fans who would resort to "Rafa knows best" rather
than be objective. You tended to be one of these.

'Rotation'  the resting of key players in important games when you had
nothing adequate to replace them with ,was defended as wise by you
and others. To me it was nonsense in Rafa's position.

I won't go over his buying and selections again,  many of which confirmed
my doubts in his management skills. They are receiving plenty of airing
elsewhere. But in the end Liverpool have ended up with Rafa carrying
just about the biggest squad in the EPL, but only a few of which are up to
the required standard, at least, the standard that the fans should rightly
expect of him.

Now, it seems, many of my reservations about him over those years are,
at last, being repeated by others. His eccentricities, which you just had to
defend, simply because he was manager of Your Team, are being
questioned. His record examined and commented on by ex players and
the media. I don't expect you to say that my doubts about him were correct
as this would involve too big a step back, but maybe they were?

True that all sides go through bad patches. Nobody could question it, or
the fact that all managers find it hard to rectify the slump. But that fact
alone
avoids the question. Putting all false loyalty  aside....judging Rafa simply
by
what he has had to spend and the advantages which came with the club
he was at.......shouldn't Liverpool be in a far better position than they
are
in dealing with it?  Shouldn't his 40 plus provide better options than he
has after 6 seasons? Should the great clubs immediate future depend
on the availability of 2 of those 40, plus the hope that a crocked £20m
midfielder would eventually prove himself?  In truth, this is exactly were
Liverpool is at right now.

If you think this is biased or unfair, so be it!

LC


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ren  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 8 Nov, 03:58
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:58:28 -0500
Local: Sun 8 Nov 2009 03:58
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com> wrote in message

news:hoidnQw2GdYh-2jXnZ2dnUVZ7rGdnZ2d@bt.com...

So you were bringing the accusations against Benitez when he was taking the
La Liga title from Real Madrid and Barcelona? I really don't see that Les,
because when you got a computer that is what he was doing, right?

> mostly being a L'pool fan in the MU group after many long posts regarding
> that club, and, very often a Man U fan here, along with being a fan of
> both
> in other groups at various times.

I know you are a Chelsea fan.......you're not a manc, you are blue through
and through, i'm not stupid.

> The reason for this is that others, maybe with good reason, think that
> any adverse comment has to be from a supporter of some other club.
> My comments on Wenger in the past ( which you have obviously
> missed)  bought the same assumptions.  I admit that I am not always
> completely impartial in my liking for teams which, for various reasons
> I would like to do well for a while, like Burnley this season, but that
> does
> not make me a supporter in the accepted sense of the word.

Wenger has been at Arsenal for 13 years. He is a great manager but a great
manager judged only on what he has done with Arsenal, right?

> I certainly wanted Chelsea to do well because, as I said at the time,
> I liked the attitude of their manager and, like many others, I was
> absolutely pissed off with almost a decade of Arsenal/ Man U or
> Man U/Arsenal seasons in the EPL. Did that make me a fan when
> I would have been just as pleased if the Russian had backed Spurs
> or Man City or Birmingham?

You are a Chelsea fan, come on, stop playing fucking games. Enough is
enough, stop lying and show your true colours.

I seriously didn't read the above, simply because i know it was an anti
Benitez rant.........am i right?

Please tell me i was wrong........christ how can a single manager come in
for so much critism?

Ren


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Beta User  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 8 Nov, 07:02
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: Google Beta User <wanyik...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Unlucky?
On Nov 7, 10:58 pm, "Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote:

> So you were bringing the accusations against Benitez when he was taking the
> La Liga title from Real Madrid and Barcelona? I really don't see that Les,
> because when you got a computer that is what he was doing, right?

Les thinks Redknapp and MOYES have more pedigree than Benitez.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lescor  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 9 Nov, 12:33
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:33:01 -0000
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 12:33
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Google Beta User" <wanyik...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:367dc6df-54af-4536-8b95-325f6e42fc82@e7g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...

> On Nov 7, 10:58 pm, "Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote:

>> So you were bringing the accusations against Benitez when he was taking
>> the
>> La Liga title from Real Madrid and Barcelona? I really don't see that
>> Les,
>> because when you got a computer that is what he was doing, right?

I have little interest in Spanish league football, so, never comment on it.

LC

> Les thinks Redknapp and MOYES have more pedigree than Benitez.

Dead right.  Far less liable to do silly things. Far more practical.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lescor  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 9 Nov, 13:01
Newsgroups: uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool
From: "Lescor" <les...@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:01:08 -0000
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 13:01
Subject: Re: Unlucky?

"Ren" <cyborgoXXXXX...@frontiernet.netXXXX> wrote in message

news:GlrJm.10594$6c2.8151@newsfe03.iad...

Well, it's not really because of him, it is because he has so many
defenders.
Whether Rafa stays or goes is a matter for others.
The fact is that, almost inevitably , any comments I have made about him on
footballing grounds are treated as personal insults, or anti Liverpool.
Seldom does anyone reply in the same terms.  It is almost amusing. " No, we
can't see the sense in rotation, but what the hell, Rafa knows best"

But you cannot continue to dodge the question of whether a reasonably
good manager ,who started with the advantages which  Rafa had at Pool,
would now be carrying such a poor crop of selections whilst carrying about
the largest playing staff in the Prem.?
Would any such manager really have all his hopes based on the availibility
of 2 of that 40 plus the hope that an unplayed new man would solve his
problems?

It is an unavoidable question and it has bugger all to do with silly
comparisons
with SAF or Wenger's winning record.

But you are right. This commenting on Rafa's eccentricities is becoming
boring, even for me.  I shall cease from now.  Rafa knows best! is my last
word on the topic.

LC


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google