A question needing an answer by Dr Claire McLintoch's study of pregnant women with swine flu, is whether or not Tamiflu is safe in pregnant women. In Australia http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/6214085/footy-friends-r... Claire Perkins was given became ill and was given Tamiflu. Tests later found she did not have Swine Flu. Two days into the course of Tamiflu, she was having sudden headaches, double vision and stomach cramps and a blotchy red rash, and was rushed to hospital. Her still born baby was later delivered by caesarian and six days afterwards the mother died.
Is "the" flu killing mothers and babies, or "Tami"flu?
Tamiflu has not been tested in pregnant women with swine flu before, because real life 2009 is that "test". Since women are immunosuppressed in pregnancy, and because swine flu is a "new" virus, Tamiflu's safety, concurrent with swine flu infection, would seem a fundamental question needing an answer.
> A question needing an answer by Dr Claire McLintoch's study of pregnant > women with swine flu, is whether or not Tamiflu is safe in pregnant women. > In Australiahttp://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/6214085/footy-friends-r... > Claire Perkins was given became ill and was given Tamiflu. Tests later found > she did not have Swine Flu. Two days into the course of Tamiflu, she was > having sudden headaches, double vision and stomach cramps and a blotchy red > rash, and was rushed to hospital. Her still born baby was later delivered > by caesarian and six days afterwards the mother died.
> Is "the" flu killing mothers and babies, or "Tami"flu?
> Tamiflu has not been tested in pregnant women with swine flu before, because > real life 2009 is that "test". Since women are immunosuppressed in > pregnancy, and because swine flu is a "new" virus, Tamiflu's safety, > concurrent with swine flu infection, would seem a fundamental question > needing an answer.
I was extremely pleased to find out one day that she was defaming me in some comments on the British Medical Journal's web site, although she was careful (or frightened) enough to refrain from actually using my name. She was defending the right to beat children to death and blame vaccines for it at the time.
>>On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:54:40 +0100, "john" <nos...@bt.com> wrote:
>>>Hilary Butler.
>>is an extremely clueless person. >>.
>I was extremely pleased to find out one day that she was defaming me >in some comments on the British Medical Journal's web site, although >she was careful (or frightened) enough to refrain from actually using >my name. She was defending the right to beat children to death and >blame vaccines for it at the time.
WHAT!? What did she write? Do you have copies? . -- How a sect kills YOUR children
>>>On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:54:40 +0100, "john" <nos...@bt.com> wrote:
>>>>Hilary Butler.
>>>is an extremely clueless person. >>>.
>>I was extremely pleased to find out one day that she was defaming me >>in some comments on the British Medical Journal's web site, although >>she was careful (or frightened) enough to refrain from actually using >>my name. She was defending the right to beat children to death and >>blame vaccines for it at the time.
>WHAT!? What did she write? Do you have copies? >.
It was some years ago and I don't know if I could still find it on the BMJ site. If I remember correctly she said that I must be demented to doubt that a violent criminal could harm a baby.
|
