|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: uk.religion.christian
From: Alec Brady <alec.br...@virgin.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 23:51:14 GMT
Local: Tues 8 Apr 2008 00:51
Subject: Re: BBC's 'The Passion'
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:32:29 -0700 (PDT), Giles <g_har...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote: >I'm not hiding a lack of research. Why should I take time out to Fine. But if you want to use the multiplicity of ascension myths to >research it, unless you count just doing some reading as research? I >prefer to look at what is probable rather than waste time checking out >the bona fides of every godman. Why should I check to see whether a >particular godman myth existed, and if it existed, how many people >believed it and for how long. I prefer to look at what is probable. On >balance it is highly probable that none of the godmen, including >Jesus, were really godmen. discredit the Christian ascension story - if, that is, you want these facts to persuade anyone else - wouldn't it be a good idea to at least find out whether these other myths existed? Or are you happy to take it on faith that a godman called Horus was claimed to have ascended to heaven? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||