<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian</id>
  <title type="text">uk.religion.christian Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Christianity in the UK (Moderated)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/uk.religion.christian/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="uk.religion.christian feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:41:33Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John R</name>
  <email>ripo...@spam.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:41:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/1fdf9af06c19c0bf/b78d035a893b4c33?show_docid=b78d035a893b4c33</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/1fdf9af06c19c0bf/b78d035a893b4c33?show_docid=b78d035a893b4c33"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Compassion</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:24:53 -0600, &amp;quot;zayton&amp;quot; &amp;lt;zay...@newwavecomm.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; You.ve lost me. I thought athiests didn&#39;t believe in God, so how can &lt;br&gt; he agree?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John R</name>
  <email>ripo...@spam.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:34:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/aaf7bbe1eac3eb2d?show_docid=aaf7bbe1eac3eb2d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/aaf7bbe1eac3eb2d?show_docid=aaf7bbe1eac3eb2d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Moderation delays</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:02:14 -0000, &amp;quot;1st Century Apostolic &lt;br&gt; Was it? How do you know? How do you know that the Israelites didn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; just say God did it to justify their evil. &lt;br&gt; Ask yourself this. Why did the doors of the Israelites need to be &lt;br&gt; marked so that death didn&#39;t fall on their firstborn. Surely God would
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:10:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/2ad843f6ddec6d28?show_docid=2ad843f6ddec6d28</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/2ad843f6ddec6d28?show_docid=2ad843f6ddec6d28"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Moderation delays Mod Yourself</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  [Ken:] &lt;br&gt; FWIW: it is my intention to moderate according to the charter of uk.r.c, &lt;br&gt; and I don&#39;t think the exact policy Ken describes is consistent with &lt;br&gt; that. But I would certainly consider being stricter about some aspects &lt;br&gt; of moderation than Mark currently is. (Note for the avoidance of doubt: &lt;br&gt; Mark is *the* moderator of uk.r.c, and the hermeneutics of the charter
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:13:12Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/bb03613775e8ffcb?show_docid=bb03613775e8ffcb</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/bb03613775e8ffcb?show_docid=bb03613775e8ffcb"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Moderation delays</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  A very acute observation.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:16:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/243a753634721aa5/9f0b9e8386bf8e81?show_docid=9f0b9e8386bf8e81</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/243a753634721aa5/9f0b9e8386bf8e81?show_docid=9f0b9e8386bf8e81"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Sin</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I think such cases are best understood as *not* involving &lt;br&gt; publishing pornographic photographs, even though the law in &lt;br&gt; its infinite majesty sometimes thinks otherwise. &lt;br&gt; (None the less, it seems to me about as obvious as anything &lt;br&gt; can be that publishing pornographic photographs of someone &lt;br&gt; doesn&#39;t always involve abuse in any reasonable sense. That is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:12:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/a0c72deab8c43a5d?show_docid=a0c72deab8c43a5d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/a0c72deab8c43a5d?show_docid=a0c72deab8c43a5d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Moderation delays Mod Yourself</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Ken did not do any moderating during his time on manual, so far as &lt;br&gt; I know. In any case, since posting to uk.r.c is a privilege and &lt;br&gt; moderation is a chore, I wouldn&#39;t get too upset if he did. &lt;br&gt; Yes, we are.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John R</name>
  <email>ripo...@spam.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:06:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/58a4bf4e17ef7e80?show_docid=58a4bf4e17ef7e80</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/adf7c796fa3deac0/58a4bf4e17ef7e80?show_docid=58a4bf4e17ef7e80"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Moderation delays</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:02:14 -0000, &amp;quot;1st Century Apostolic &lt;br&gt; reveals what will happen to those that reject Christ at the end of the &lt;br&gt; age &lt;br&gt; ditto &lt;br&gt; reminds christians of the need to remain holy and Godly in the last &lt;br&gt; days. &lt;br&gt; Nothing there that says that if a christian is disobedient to God he &lt;br&gt; will make their loved ones suffer.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T00:49:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/537200ffbbe13ab4/c2f64f5ea0afe1d5?show_docid=c2f64f5ea0afe1d5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/537200ffbbe13ab4/c2f64f5ea0afe1d5?show_docid=c2f64f5ea0afe1d5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Christian economics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Quite so. And what if making kebabs for dinner tomorrow summons &lt;br&gt; a previously unheard-of Kebab God from some far corner of the &lt;br&gt; universe, who will immediately eat the entire human race (on a &lt;br&gt; stick, in a delicious lemony marinade)? Perhaps we&#39;ll have pasta &lt;br&gt; instead.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T00:47:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/537200ffbbe13ab4/248667b57e5853ec?show_docid=248667b57e5853ec</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/537200ffbbe13ab4/248667b57e5853ec?show_docid=248667b57e5853ec"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Christian economics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I believe the usual Christian position is that he was absolutely right &lt;br&gt; but not in remotely the way he had in mind :-).
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Gareth McCaughan</name>
  <email>gareth.mccaug...@pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T00:47:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/420f4f337d847b22/b42a185387b24758?show_docid=b42a185387b24758</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/420f4f337d847b22/b42a185387b24758?show_docid=b42a185387b24758"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Evolution Supported by the Bible?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Oh, Ken, you surely know what bollocks you&#39;re talking. I do wish &lt;br&gt; you&#39;d have a try at discussing things in good faith rather &lt;br&gt; than slinging mud around. (Pun not deliberate but noticed.) &lt;br&gt; There are lots of theories about the earliest origins of life &lt;br&gt; (perhaps I should say: of what later became life). They do not
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Billing</name>
  <email>uncle...@tnglwood.demon.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T23:33:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/25f61bc6e3c7d4f8/6ba0f516af963498?show_docid=6ba0f516af963498</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/25f61bc6e3c7d4f8/6ba0f516af963498?show_docid=6ba0f516af963498"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Life on Mars</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  As the bottle floated ashore we opened it and found the message that - .. &lt;br&gt; -- Tim .-. had written: &lt;br&gt; Also, since Jesus defined a religion with no calendar, Christianity is &lt;br&gt; well designed to leave the surface of the Earth, which implies that we may &lt;br&gt; meet some of them.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael J Davis</name>
  <email>mjduse...@trustsof.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T22:28:58Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/25f61bc6e3c7d4f8/5b2ba18fa1e1fb08?show_docid=5b2ba18fa1e1fb08</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/25f61bc6e3c7d4f8/5b2ba18fa1e1fb08?show_docid=5b2ba18fa1e1fb08"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Life on Mars</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Giles &amp;lt;g_har...@yahoo.co.uk&amp;gt; was inspired to say &lt;br&gt; No, God isn&#39;t; but the Jewish version is so. The OT is also full of &lt;br&gt; stories of God&#39;s kindness to non-Jews, as well as the ones that you pick &lt;br&gt; out. &lt;br&gt; The main problem was that these people worshipped &#39;other&#39; gods. But, of &lt;br&gt; course, you can find plenty of texts that prove whatever pov you want -
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>zayton</name>
  <email>zay...@newwavecomm.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T22:07:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/c2d0b442d59984ce/2e3117438fdd32ba?show_docid=2e3117438fdd32ba</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/c2d0b442d59984ce/2e3117438fdd32ba?show_docid=2e3117438fdd32ba"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The return of Jesus</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Would explain a lot of things. &lt;br&gt; Starting with the shape the world is in.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>zayton</name>
  <email>zay...@newwavecomm.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T22:05:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/1b52b176316be235/676d83ab511f1bc6?show_docid=676d83ab511f1bc6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/1b52b176316be235/676d83ab511f1bc6?show_docid=676d83ab511f1bc6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: For God&#39;s Sake</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The poster being spoken of has indicated confidence that his opinions are &lt;br&gt; precisely those, not only of the first Century Apostles, but of Christ &lt;br&gt; himself. And once admitted to me in an exchange that he might well be the &lt;br&gt; only Christion alive today still teachings these truths. &lt;br&gt; If &amp;quot;thinking he can speak on behalf of Christ&amp;quot; accurately characterises how
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist</name>
  <email></email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-26T21:34:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/1b52b176316be235/5db82f99c087764d?show_docid=5db82f99c087764d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk.religion.christian/browse_thread/thread/1b52b176316be235/5db82f99c087764d?show_docid=5db82f99c087764d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: For God&#39;s Sake</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Then should they not comply with the same rules as everyone else does, or &lt;br&gt; does it give them some addition freedom from being moderated themselves. &lt;br&gt; I can imagine if I had stated about Mark or anyone else in a post.....&amp;quot;If I &lt;br&gt; was, like you, arrogant enough to think that I can speak on &lt;br&gt; behalf of Christ,&amp;quot; just what his reaction would be....a rejection of the
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
