|
|
uk.rec.naturist |
On 3 July, 08:21, "Duncan Heenan" <duncanhee...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: If Mick's mates won't bite the bullet, then we'll have to go it alone. Pete
> I wonder if Mr. Farrar's words " This may satisfy the proper concerns of There are still a great many members who are unsatisfied with the way
> some members, though they will surely insist that we should be much more
> careful in future.", will be realised in action. If so, being 'careful'
> would seem to imply that we should not allow any one person to control
> CCBN's money (not forgetting that information is power). If there is , as I
> suppose above, a person who feels they were complicit in the Ayers affair
> (and by 'repaying' the money, as above, is admitting it) surely she, or he,
> should not be involved in CCBN's finances again?
> CCBN's current Treasurer is stepping down in October and no one has stood
> for replacement so far. I wonder if the EC is concerned at the lack of
> financial control this could lead to? It would be hard for them to defend a
> situation in the future if the person who has not been named, turned out to
> be the sole person with control over CCBN's money and the information about
> it, wouldn't it?
> --
> Duncan Heenan
the EC dealt with this issue, as can be seen on the BN forum, so
whilst the EC, our elected officials, refuse to do as their members
wish, why then cannot a quorate number of members take the issue in
hand and pursue it through the courts as a members claim. I assume
Duncan is still prepared to underwrite the claim, has already done the
leg work, and is willing to appear on our behalf.
If all that is required is 20 signatures of fully paid up members of
CCBN, I would be more than willing to put my name forward, and another
18 shouldn't be that difficult to find. Should anyone be interested in
adding their name, please drop me a line.