Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion CCBN & Mick Ayers' unpaid debts - yet another twist in the tale!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Pete Knight  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 6 July, 19:03
Newsgroups: uk.rec.naturist
From: Pete Knight <peteknig...@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon 6 July 2009 19:03
Subject: Re: CCBN & Mick Ayers' unpaid debts - yet another twist in the tale!
On 3 July, 08:21, "Duncan Heenan" <duncanhee...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

> I wonder if Mr. Farrar's words " This may satisfy the proper concerns of
> some members, though they will surely insist that we should be much more
> careful in future.", will be realised in action. If so, being 'careful'
> would seem to imply that we should not allow any one person to control
> CCBN's money (not forgetting that information is power). If there is , as I
> suppose above, a person who feels they were complicit in the Ayers affair
> (and by 'repaying' the money, as above, is admitting it) surely she, or he,
> should not be involved in CCBN's finances again?
> CCBN's current Treasurer is stepping down in October and no one has stood
> for replacement so far. I wonder if the EC is concerned at the lack of
> financial control this could lead to? It would be hard for them to defend a
> situation in the future if the person who has not been named, turned out to
> be the sole person with control over CCBN's money and the information about
> it, wouldn't it?
> --
> Duncan Heenan

There are still a great many members who are unsatisfied with the way
the EC dealt with this issue, as can be seen on the BN forum, so
whilst the EC, our elected officials, refuse to do as their members
wish, why then cannot a quorate number of members take the issue in
hand and pursue it through the courts as a members claim. I assume
Duncan is still prepared to underwrite the claim, has already done the
leg work, and is willing to appear on our behalf.
If all that is required is 20 signatures of fully paid up members of
CCBN, I would be more than willing to put my name forward, and another
18 shouldn't be that difficult to find. Should anyone be interested in
adding their name, please drop me a line.

If Mick's mates won't bite the bullet, then we'll have to go it alone.

Pete


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google