I'm trying to determine the relative suitability of LED, Xenon, halogen and krypton bulbs for use in cycle headlights for use on unlit roads. I hear people say that LEDs are the most efficient, but I also hear people say that it's difficult to focus them into a long enough beam for use on dark roads. I hear people say that Halogen lamps are more suitable because they give longer beams, but are not as efficient. I hear people say that krypton bulbs are better, and I hear people say that xenon bulbs are better still. Anyone agree?
What I want, personally, is a front light that is *inexpensive* and will give a long and sufficiently wide, bright beam for 2-3 hours on 2 or 4 rechargeable NimH 'AA' batteries - and isn't likely to blow its bulbs. Is that feasable? Which of the above bulb types is most likely to be in such a lamp?
Jim D wrote: > What I want, personally, is a front light that is *inexpensive* and > will give a long and sufficiently wide, bright beam for 2-3 hours on 2 > or 4 rechargeable NimH 'AA' batteries - and isn't likely to blow its > bulbs. Is that feasable? Which of the above bulb types is most likely > to be in such a lamp?
Hmm, not quite inexpensive at 40 quid, but the Cateye EL530 is getting some very good words.
Alex wrote: > Jim D wrote: > > What I want, personally, is a front light that is *inexpensive* and > > will give a long and sufficiently wide, bright beam for 2-3 hours on 2 > > or 4 rechargeable NimH 'AA' batteries - and isn't likely to blow its > > bulbs. Is that feasable? Which of the above bulb types is most likely > > to be in such a lamp?
> Hmm, not quite inexpensive at 40 quid, but the Cateye EL530 is getting > some very good words.
> -Alex
I have two now, scorchingly bright. Oh, you can get them from the US on eBay for around £25-£27 delivered, try geargurl and zbikenut.
Jim D wrote: > I'm trying to determine the relative suitability of LED, Xenon, > halogen and krypton bulbs for use in cycle headlights for use on unlit > roads. I hear people say that LEDs are the most efficient,
Yes, but not by much at the moment (the technology is improving rapidly though).
> but I also > hear people say that it's difficult to focus them into a long enough > beam for use on dark roads.
This might have been true for a cluster of 5mm LEDs, but it's doesn't apply to the high-power (i.e. >= 1W) LEDs that are now available.
> I hear people say that Halogen lamps are > more suitable because they give longer beams, but are not as > efficient. I hear people say that krypton bulbs are better, and I hear > people say that xenon bulbs are better still. Anyone agree?
Not really. I think you'll find different manufacturers using various terms to claim that their bulbs are better than others, I wouldn't take much notice.
> What I want, personally, is a front light that is *inexpensive* and > will give a long and sufficiently wide, bright beam for 2-3 hours on 2 > or 4 rechargeable NimH 'AA' batteries - and isn't likely to blow its > bulbs. Is that feasable? Which of the above bulb types is most likely > to be in such a lamp?
If you're worried about blowing bulbs, just go with LEDs. These are now available for both battery and dynamo powered systems, but if you really want inexpensive you're pretty much limited to battery powered. There have been lots of discussions about lights recently (it's that time of year), you can use Google Groups to search the archives. I'll just say I like my Trelock LS-600, and were I not able to get another one of those I'd go for a B&M Ixon, but YMMV depending on what your priorities are.
<n...@antjones.fastmail.fm> wrote: >If you're worried about blowing bulbs, just go with LEDs. These are now >available for both battery and dynamo powered systems, but if you really >want inexpensive you're pretty much limited to battery powered. There have >been lots of discussions about lights recently (it's that time of year), >you can use Google Groups to search the archives. I'll just say I like my >Trelock LS-600, and were I not able to get another one of those I'd go for >a B&M Ixon, but YMMV depending on what your priorities are.
Thanks for the informative reply. Yes, there's a lot to be said for a (LED) bulb that won't blow at an inconvenient moment.
Jim D wrote: > I'm trying to determine the relative suitability of LED, Xenon, > halogen and krypton bulbs for use in cycle headlights for use on unlit > roads. I hear people say that LEDs are the most efficient, but I also > hear people say that it's difficult to focus them into a long enough > beam for use on dark roads. I hear people say that Halogen lamps are > more suitable because they give longer beams, but are not as > efficient. I hear people say that krypton bulbs are better, and I hear > people say that xenon bulbs are better still. Anyone agree?
> What I want, personally, is a front light that is *inexpensive* and > will give a long and sufficiently wide, bright beam for 2-3 hours on 2 > or 4 rechargeable NimH 'AA' batteries - and isn't likely to blow its > bulbs. Is that feasable? Which of the above bulb types is most likely > to be in such a lamp?
That's nowhere near enough battery power to run a halogen or any filament bulb sufficiently bright for so long. You'll have to either spend a lot of money on a new-generation LED light or change your mind about the battery size (if not getting a dynamo) and use halogen lamps. Why not use a separate battery strapped under your top tube or in a bottle cage?
Jim D wrote: > On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:28:14 +0000, Anthony Jones > <n...@antjones.fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> If you're worried about blowing bulbs, just go with LEDs. These are >> now available for both battery and dynamo powered systems, but if >> you really want inexpensive you're pretty much limited to battery >> powered. There have been lots of discussions about lights recently >> (it's that time of year), you can use Google Groups to search the >> archives. I'll just say I like my Trelock LS-600, and were I not >> able to get another one of those I'd go for a B&M Ixon, but YMMV >> depending on what your priorities are.
> Thanks for the informative reply. Yes, there's a lot to be said for a > (LED) bulb that won't blow at an inconvenient moment.
Bulb blowing is no big deal if the bulb is easy to change* and you have a backup LED light. Don't let this factor put you off halogens. MR11 halogen bulbs, for example, even when over-volted, actually last ages anyway.
* eg. with Lumicycle lamps, the front ring unscrews and the bulb plugs into the holder. All done in a few seconds without removing the light from the bike.
> Thanks for the informative reply. Yes, there's a lot to be said for a > (LED) bulb that won't blow at an inconvenient moment.
Does this mean you have a problem with blowing bulbs, or just that you would rather avoid the risk?
FWIW, I bought my current lighting set-up nearly 10 years ago, and bought a spare halogen bulb at the same time. I haven't used the spare yet! The bike is used for daily commuting, and that means lights in both directions very shortly. Mostly been driven off a bottle dynamo, but changed to a dynohub a couple of years ago.
However, I bought a cheap LED set from Halfords at the weekend to make my MTB legal (more or less), and I was stunned at the LED brightness. If Withington Cycles don't hurry up and deliver my B&M light to replace the one I broke (bulb still OK though!!), the order will be cancelled and I'll get an LED front light instead.
The Halfords one, if anyone is interested, is on wiggle as "Smart Polaris II Super White 5 LED Front Light" at £20.
Paul Boyd wrote: > FWIW, I bought my current lighting set-up nearly 10 years ago, and > bought a spare halogen bulb at the same time. I haven't used the > spare yet! The bike is used for daily commuting, and that means > lights in both directions very shortly. Mostly been driven off a > bottle dynamo, but changed to a dynohub a couple of years ago.
> However, I bought a cheap LED set from Halfords at the weekend to make > my MTB legal (more or less), and I was stunned at the LED brightness. > If Withington Cycles don't hurry up and deliver my B&M light to > replace the one I broke (bulb still OK though!!), the order will be > cancelled and I'll get an LED front light instead.
> The Halfords one, if anyone is interested, is on wiggle as "Smart > Polaris II Super White 5 LED Front Light" at £20.
That Polaris light is great for being seen by and as an emergency backup to see by, but not good enough for routine use for more than a few minutes on unlit roads, IMO. That is if you like to /comfortably/ see where you're going and to see well ahead.
I'm guessing you'd agree, Paul, but I just wanted to clarify.
Pete Biggs said the following on 01/11/2006 15:40:
> That Polaris light is great for being seen by and as an emergency backup to > see by, but not good enough for routine use for more than a few minutes on > unlit roads, IMO. That is if you like to /comfortably/ see where you're > going and to see well ahead.
I dunno - it's pretty bright. I haven't used it for unlit roads though, or unlit off-roads for that matter, but that wasn't the intention. There is only one bit of my commute (where I also use this light as a backup to my halogen light) that doesn't have streetlights and is a bit dark, but there's so much light pollution that it isn't really an issue. These lights were really bought to take with me on my MTB in case I get caught out so that I was at least showing willing! If I'd planned to cycle off-road at night (which is actually great fun, but my local woods is probably full of doggers and druggies at night!) I would probably get something like the EL530.
Paul Boyd wrote: > Jim D said the following on 01/11/2006 15:08:
> > Thanks for the informative reply. Yes, there's a lot to be said for a > > (LED) bulb that won't blow at an inconvenient moment.
> Does this mean you have a problem with blowing bulbs, or just that you > would rather avoid the risk?
> FWIW, I bought my current lighting set-up nearly 10 years ago, and > bought a spare halogen bulb at the same time. I haven't used the spare > yet! The bike is used for daily commuting, and that means lights in > both directions very shortly. Mostly been driven off a bottle dynamo, > but changed to a dynohub a couple of years ago.
It's not fair (stamps foot)
Following up to my "SON dynamo, bulbs keep blowing" post. The bulb I put in on 16th October failed on 27th October.
So I managed something of the order of 7 hours with that bulb :-(
I'm now using a Cateye Opticube. I may not get time this weekend but I'm going to see about putting in a rectifier and running it off the dynamo instead and see what happens.
(I've already done a few tests and it draws 240mA @ 5.97V so hopefully a 22R 3W wirewound resistor in parallel with the light will be all that is required. - will up the resistor if the light is too dim)
Just have to hope that the rear light doesn't mind being driven from DC.
(The brompton can't fold with the light on the handlebars and removing it won't be an option when it's wired into the dynamo but I'll work something out)
Paul Boyd wrote: > Pete Biggs said the following on 01/11/2006 15:40:
[Polaris 5-LED light]
>> That Polaris light is great for being seen by and as an emergency >> backup to see by, but not good enough for routine use for more than >> a few minutes on unlit roads, IMO. That is if you like to >> /comfortably/ see where you're going and to see well ahead.
> I dunno - it's pretty bright.
Not compared to a 5W MR11 halogen, nor is the beam pattern as smooth.
Maybe two of them together would be quite reasonable, however -- perhaps producing a more pleasing result than some more powerful single lights.
I'm just concerned about not raising people's expectations too much.
>That's nowhere near enough battery power to run a halogen or any filament >bulb sufficiently bright for so long. You'll have to either spend a lot of >money on a new-generation LED light or change your mind about the battery >size (if not getting a dynamo) and use halogen lamps.
I see... Thanks for clarifying.
> Why not use a >separate battery strapped under your top tube or in a bottle cage?
Could do. It's just that I have a charger that charges 4x NimH AA batteries (and 4x nIMH batteries) and was hoping to put it to good use! I never seem to be riding for more than 2-3 hours at night.
Perhaps a new-generation LED that runs on 4 AA batteries would be the way to go.
I was hoping to find one that had one main-beam LED and an additional smaller LED for use on lit streets to save power - but I've only seen them with 'on' and 'off' options.
Still, the amount of time saved, fiddling around with battery chargers, might justify the extra cost.
<p...@pomegranateremovehighlyimpracticalfruitbiggs.tc> wrote: >Bulb blowing is no big deal if the bulb is easy to change* and you have a >backup LED light. Don't let this factor put you off halogens. MR11 halogen >bulbs, for example, even when over-volted, actually last ages anyway.
Yes, I expect you are right. I was probably thinking of the older style non-halogen bulbs. Can you suggest a minimum wattage for totally dark, unlit roads? I guess 1.2w is pretty useless, is it?
Jim D wrote: >> Why not use a >> separate battery strapped under your top tube or in a bottle cage?
> Could do. It's just that I have a charger that charges 4x NimH AA > batteries (and 4x nIMH batteries) and was hoping to put it to good > use! I never seem to be riding for more than 2-3 hours at night.
You could get a battery box that takes 6*, 10 or 12* ordinary NiMH AA cells. Doing two or three lots of charging is a bit of a nuisance but doesn't take long with a fast charger. Actually I do this myself sometimes to save using my expensive battery so often (they don't last forever).
Small neat MR11 halogen lamps are available separately from Lumicycle for about £30 or you could make your own. This larger MR16 homemade one here on eBay is great, though I'm not sure you'd get enough run time with a 20W bulb: http://tinyurl.com/y9mbhk. (MR16s under 20W tend to have very poor beam angles & patterns in practice)
* Use with 6 or 12V bulbs respectively. The over-volting dramatically increases brightness, whiteness and efficiency, albeit at the cost of reduced bulb life. Two 6-cell battery boxes can be wired together in series if you like. Wrap in a plastic bag and it makes quite a neat package to vecro-strap to the bike.
Take a look at Busch and Muller Ixon. Not cheap, but very good for LED portable solution. Runtime fis with your need, and It's OK on it's own on the unlit section of my route.
Just over £50 imported from Germany (several sellers on Ebay) Including batteries and charger. This is also good because it charges the batteries inside the lamp, without removal.
Jim D wrote: > Can you suggest a minimum wattage for totally > dark, unlit roads? I guess 1.2w is pretty useless, is it?
5W minimum for halogen, is my suggestion.
It's possible to see where you're going with less than that -- but not if you want to feel relaxed *or* want to go fast safely. You have to concentrate much harder than usual and also brake down the hills.
Another point regarding run time & battery capacity: If /any/ of your ride is on lit roads, it's well worth using just a small LED light for the lit bits and saving your main system for the unlit bits.
> don't hurry up and deliver my B&M light to replace > the one I broke (bulb still OK though!!), the order will be cancelled > and I'll get an LED front light instead.
A very well stocked website, with a not very well stocked shop behind it. Nice chaps there thobut - happy to fix bikes instead of just sell 'em, unlike the one up the road (obviously making too much money to bother with the dirty stuff).
Josey wrote: > "Jim D" <54321SSS...@aol.com> wrote in message
> Take a look at Busch and Muller Ixon. Not cheap, but very good for LED > portable solution. Runtime fis with your need, and It's OK on it's own on > the unlit section of my route.
> Just over £50 imported from Germany (several sellers on Ebay) Including > batteries and charger. This is also good because it charges the batteries > inside the lamp, without removal.
Streuth, thats 50 euros over here. I'm in the wrong business, I should be shipping those things back.
When I wrote the above I was thinking more about MR11-based systems and forgetting about the large 3W halogen light I used to use with a dynamo. That was quite useful on unlit roads. So it depends on the type and size of the lamp and bulb as well as the wattage (and the amount of over-volting).
"Tosspot" <FrankDotLe...@esa.int> wrote in message > Streuth, thats 50 euros over here. I'm in the wrong business, I should be > shipping those things back
Which is why I bought one from Germany, but add the batteries and charger and shipping gets you to about £50.
Buy one from a UK dealer and the battery/charger model is £75 + shipping.
Jim D wrote: > I'm trying to determine the relative suitability of LED, Xenon, > halogen and krypton bulbs for use in cycle headlights for use on unlit > roads. I hear people say that LEDs are the most efficient, but I also > hear people say that it's difficult to focus them into a long enough > beam for use on dark roads. I hear people say that Halogen lamps are > more suitable because they give longer beams, but are not as > efficient. I hear people say that krypton bulbs are better, and I hear > people say that xenon bulbs are better still. Anyone agree?
> What I want, personally, is a front light that is *inexpensive* and > will give a long and sufficiently wide, bright beam for 2-3 hours on 2 > or 4 rechargeable NimH 'AA' batteries - and isn't likely to blow its > bulbs. Is that feasable? Which of the above bulb types is most likely > to be in such a lamp?
LEDs are not good when run on rechargeable batteries. They are very voltage-dependent. I have done the measuring with a light meter and the output on NiMH is roughly halved compared with fresh alkaline cells. If you use LEDs, I strongly recommend lithium AA cells, as they are a full 1.5V with a much flatter discharge curve (and, as a bonus, are spookily lightweight).
As you want to use rechargeables, a reasonable 4 x AA halogen lamp will fit the bill. Cateye make a Micro-Halogen one and, if you can find it, the Energizer halogen lamp is pretty good too; sometimes it comes as a set with a halogen *rear* lamp of identical design and power, which is probably overkill. They both use 2.4W 4.8V bulbs. You get just over two hours' run time on mere 1300mAh cells, so the modern 2100mAH or 2500mAh cells will give you up to 4 hours, and just enough light to see by. The bulbs last a very long time in my experince - in fact, I've never actually had one fail although they get a bit dimmer over a long time.
Krypton bulbs are just a little brighter than standard torch bulbs, and not worth considering. Xenon is a much-misused term, either meaning halogen bulbs with a bit of xenon gas in them so the filament can be burnt harder, or a full HID arc system, but you won't find xenon in any lamp intended for 4 x AA power.
Andrew Price wrote: >>Hmm, not quite inexpensive at 40 quid, but the Cateye EL530 is getting >>some very good words.
> Any idea how it compares to the B&M Ixon?
I haven't seen a EL-530, but I'd /guess/ that like most Cateye lights it's unregulated (meaning the light output quickly decreases as the batteries run out), and that it probably doesn't have quite as good a beam pattern on the road.
Zog The Undeniable wrote: > LEDs are not good when run on rechargeable batteries. They are very > voltage-dependent.
That's an overgeneralisation. Regulated LEDs lights are available, which are entirely voltage-independent over the normal operating range of alkaline/NiMH batteries.