I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way they are protected against crud.
I will buy the bike through the Cycleto Work scheme which has a limit of £1000, so Rholoff is out of the question - it will have to be Shimano Alfine.
I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears on the hills.
Does anyone have any views/experience of this?
Also, does anyone have a table on ratios of hub gears v. derailleurs?
> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub > gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way > they are protected against crud.
> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub > gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way they > are protected against crud.
> I will buy the bike through the Cycleto Work scheme which has a limit of > £1000, so Rholoff is out of the question - it will have to be Shimano > Alfine.
> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow > in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears > on the hills.
> Does anyone have any views/experience of this?
Not the case. My current buildup I didn't do any gearing calculations and 6th gear is good for 20mph and 1st low enough for anything I'm going to tackle. I'll move the ratio northwards a bit more this weekend. Can't recommend it enough though, lovely smooth shift.
> Also, does anyone have a table on ratios of hub gears v. derailleurs?
Alpinehorn wrote: > I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow > in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears > on the hills.
My wife has a Spesh Globe Elite with the Shimano 8 speed for a commuter hack. She's not complained about the range, and when I've borrowed it neither have I. I'd want more for touring or sports (we both have touring bikes with wider ranges), but for commuting and general use (and Dundee ain't flat) it's a great tool.
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.cli...@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub > gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way > they are protected against crud.
> I will buy the bike through the Cycleto Work scheme which has a limit of > £1000, so Rholoff is out of the question - it will have to be Shimano > Alfine.
> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too > narrow in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out > of gears on the hills.
> Does anyone have any views/experience of this?
> Also, does anyone have a table on ratios of hub gears v. derailleurs?
> Thanks,
> Byron Jenkins
Although you have ruled out the "rohloff" due to cost. I must say that in terms of providing me with a really pleasant ride which copes with all my needs -- daily pratting around, training runs, shopping runs + trailer and my annual tour in Europe -- I have never regretted buying the Thorne Raven Tour Exactly 3 years ago today.
It has completed a short 12000 miles and the hub gear makes it, IMO, an ideal all rounder bike. On tour the hub gear is virtually maintenance free in comparison with the derailleur set up, which needs daily cleaning and attention.
The only problem that I have experienced is chain stretch/wear. I actually expected that since the chain is in a fixed ration in the chain drive setup, that there would be noticeable reduction in chain wear but that has not been the case
When touring with derailleur I generally fitted a new chain and new cassette every year before setting off.
I really expected that to be a thing of the past but I have just fitted my third new chain after completing my 2009 tour.
It had actually done two tours ( well 1 1/2 really -- including my failed 2008 tour) and by the time I got back from Berlin I cold certainly tell! The journey back from Hull King George dock to home -- some 90 kms was very much "clunk click" every "push" on the pedals
The problem may be due to touring under load -- and I am not your typical slim fit cyclist! The drive chain has to work hard -- but I had hoped for better than the twists and strains put on the chain with a derailleur
I suspect that you have a point with your
"I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears on the hills."
I have 14 gears to play with but actually have it "geared down" for touring under trailer and camping load. So at the bottom end I have generally no problems with hills -- but certainly for the normal day to day stuff I am distinctly limited at the top end. I can get up to about 40 kph ( 25 mph) maximum by which time I am spinning very "out". Actually with me that is not a huge problem and my normal top speed is a comfortable 20 mph/32 kph these days. I am a pootler rather than a "got to get there'er"
But I would think that for a commuting bike a hub gear system is ideal. I give my velo a wash down about once a month and clean the chain at the same time and that is about it
A little ramble!!!!!!!! :-
It takes me back to my youth when my bike was a heavy pre-war ( 2 not 1 !) "sit up and beg" Raleigh with the 3 speed Sturmey Archer and 3 position gear shift on the crossbar. Every winter it was stripped down and bearings re greased, the chain removed and cleaned, new brake pads fitted -- my memory may be at fault --- but I don't think it ever had a new chain in its life! Oiling points on the bottom crank case and on the hub of each wheel ( protected by a little flap) and a whacking great bottle dynamo on the front wheel.. I do remember that I carried a little oil can in my saddlebag which would squirt a drop of oil with each click! I shall never forget the first time that I cycled back home from school and got all the way home up a series of steep hills without getting off the bike I must have been about 11/12 at the time. My older brother ( 6 years older), had a "racer" with an early derailleur system on it, which I was very very occasionally allowed to try out -- I could have flown on that one!
Ah well!
From Trevor A Panther In South Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk( A bit messy - under review)
In message <7li79uF3e00k...@mid.individual.net>, Peter Clinch <p.j.cli...@dundee.ac.uk> writes
>Alpinehorn wrote:
>> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow >> in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears >> on the hills.
>My wife has a Spesh Globe Elite with the Shimano 8 speed for a commuter >hack. She's not complained about the range, and when I've borrowed it >neither have I. I'd want more for touring or sports (we both have >touring bikes with wider ranges), but for commuting and general use (and >Dundee ain't flat) it's a great tool.
Yup, I'd go with that. I have a Shimno speed on my utility bike, previously a Sachs 7. Used in London and then hilly Leeds. I never really found it wanting, except on a few very steep hills.
Though when I got a kiddy trailer I put a second chainwheel on the front for a lower range as that + shopping was a bit more of an effort.
> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub > gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way > they are protected against crud.
> I will buy the bike through the Cycleto Work scheme which has a limit of > 1000, so Rholoff is out of the question - it will have to be Shimano > Alfine.
> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too > narrow in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out > of gears on the hills.
> Does anyone have any views/experience of this?
> Also, does anyone have a table on ratios of hub gears v. derailleurs?
> Thanks,
> Byron Jenkins
I find my 5 Sturmey-Archers fine for my local commute. If I had some really steep hills and a heavy load I'd probably want a lower gear though. The 5 gears are quite widely spaced which I find fine when it's just me, but on a group ride when I'm cycling to everyone else's speed I find I'd like a bit finer choice of gears.
If I had £1000 to spend I'd look at the Giant Seek (can't remember what hub that has, but it has more than 5 geears).
> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow > in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears > on the hills.
I had a bike with a Shimano 7-speed ... a Dawes or some sort ... I didn't find the range too narrow but I did find the gearing too low: spinning out at 20mph and easily lifting the front wheel when starting off in bottom gear (although that trait was aggravated by the frame design placing the CofG further back than normal). In the end I rebuilt it using a cheap second-hand MTB frame and the chainset off a Raleigh roadster (so I was using 1/8" chain - Sturmey sprockets fit the Shimano hub). That upped the gearing and made the whole range usable: did the Dun Run on it a few years ago.
> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub > gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way they > are protected against crud.
> I will buy the bike through the Cycleto Work scheme which has a limit of > £1000, so Rholoff is out of the question - it will have to be Shimano > Alfine.
> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too narrow > in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of gears > on the hills.
> Does anyone have any views/experience of this?
> Also, does anyone have a table on ratios of hub gears v. derailleurs?
Naqerj wrote: > I had a bike with a Shimano 7-speed ... a Dawes or some sort ... I > didn't find the range too narrow but I did find the gearing too low: > spinning out at 20mph and easily lifting the front wheel when starting > off in bottom gear (although that trait was aggravated by the frame > design placing the CofG further back than normal). In the end I rebuilt > it using a cheap second-hand MTB frame and the chainset off a Raleigh > roadster (so I was using 1/8" chain - Sturmey sprockets fit the Shimano > hub). That upped the gearing and made the whole range usable: did the > Dun Run on it a few years ago.
Seems a bit drastic using a whole new frame etc. Why not just put a bigger chainwheel and/or smaller sprocket on the original?
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net p.j.cli...@dundee.ac.uk http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
On 2009-11-05, Alpinehorn <alpineh...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Hi group,
> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub > gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the way they > are protected against crud.
Craig Wallace wrote: > On 05/11/2009 23:35, Alpinehorn wrote: >> Hi group,
>> I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going for hub >> gears instead of derailleur, because of the low maintenance and the >> way they >> are protected against crud.
>> I will buy the bike through the Cycleto Work scheme which has a limit of >> £1000, so Rholoff is out of the question - it will have to be Shimano >> Alfine.
>> I am told that one problem with these hub gears is that they are too >> narrow >> in range, so that one both spins out at the fast end, and runs out of >> gears >> on the hills.
>> Does anyone have any views/experience of this?
>> Also, does anyone have a table on ratios of hub gears v. derailleurs?
>> I had a bike with a Shimano 7-speed ... a Dawes or some sort ... I >> didn't find the range too narrow but I did find the gearing too low: >> spinning out at 20mph and easily lifting the front wheel when starting >> off in bottom gear (although that trait was aggravated by the frame >> design placing the CofG further back than normal). In the end I >> rebuilt it using a cheap second-hand MTB frame and the chainset off a >> Raleigh roadster (so I was using 1/8" chain - Sturmey sprockets fit >> the Shimano hub). That upped the gearing and made the whole range >> usable: did the Dun Run on it a few years ago.
> Seems a bit drastic using a whole new frame etc. Why not just put a > bigger chainwheel and/or smaller sprocket on the original?
It was the other way round really, when I decided to rebuild it, I took that opportunity to sort the gearing out. There were other things I didn't like about the bike too - like the aforementioned CofG being so far back. It was my commuting bike, so, when I retired, a complete rebuild seemed the best way of continuing to make use of its best bits... come to think of it, the hub gear was the only original bit to survive ... I retained the bars, saddle, pedals and hub dynamo, but they were all bits I'd fitted when I was commuting with it. The final spur towards the rebuild was when the rear rim started to crack. I bought the MTB (rigid steel frame, rigid forks but a good set of alloy rims) at a Gaze's auction for about a quarter of what a new rim would have cost. The chainset and sprocket came from the big box of bits in the cellar. I can't remember where the spokes came from - perhaps I reused the ones from the MTB wheels and just shortened them a bit. I think a tin of paint and a chain were the only new bits I had to buy.
> It has completed a short 12000 miles and the hub gear makes it, IMO, an > ideal all rounder bike. On tour the hub gear is virtually maintenance free > in comparison with the derailleur set up, which needs daily cleaning and > attention.
I know that touring is different to commuting, but I'm always a bit nonplussed when folks talk about how hub gears require so much less maintenance than derailleurs. Commuting 100 miles a week all year round I'm up and down the gears all the time and I reckon my der only needs a quick tweak to the cable tension about once a year and is still fine after 20K miles (OK I have replaced the jockey wheels once).
POHB <goo...@hayward.uk.net> wrote: > On 6 Nov, 11:07, "Trevor A Panther" > > It has completed a short 12000 miles and the hub gear makes it, > > IMO, an ideal all rounder bike. On tour the hub gear is virtually > > maintenance free in comparison with the derailleur set up, which > > needs daily cleaning and attention.
> I know that touring is different to commuting, but I'm always a bit > nonplussed when folks talk about how hub gears require so much less > maintenance than derailleurs. Commuting 100 miles a week all year > round I'm up and down the gears all the time and I reckon my der only > needs a quick tweak to the cable tension about once a year and is > still fine after 20K miles (OK I have replaced the jockey wheels > once).
Chains can be made to last a lot longer with hub gears, and bikes kept cleaner.
POHB wrote: > I know that touring is different to commuting, but I'm always a bit > nonplussed when folks talk about how hub gears require so much less > maintenance than derailleurs. Commuting 100 miles a week all year > round I'm up and down the gears all the time and I reckon my der only > needs a quick tweak to the cable tension about once a year and is > still fine after 20K miles (OK I have replaced the jockey wheels > once).
Do you ever lubricate the derailler? Clean the cluster? Maybe you're just lucky but my experience of deraillers is they get clagged up with dust & grime pretty quickly. Nothing you can do or say will persuade me to part with my hub gear! :-)
> POHB wrote: >> I know that touring is different to commuting, but I'm always a bit >> nonplussed when folks talk about how hub gears require so much less >> maintenance than derailleurs. Commuting 100 miles a week all year >> round I'm up and down the gears all the time and I reckon my der only >> needs a quick tweak to the cable tension about once a year and is >> still fine after 20K miles (OK I have replaced the jockey wheels >> once).
> Do you ever lubricate the derailler? Clean the cluster? Maybe you're > just lucky but my experience of deraillers is they get clagged up with > dust & grime pretty quickly. Nothing you can do or say will persuade me > to part with my hub gear! :-)
I don't clean the cluster and only rarely lubricate the derailleur. Yes, it gets mucky back there, but that doesn't appear to actually be a problem.
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:05:43 -0600, Ben C <spams...@spam.eggs> wrote: > On 2009-11-05, Alpinehorn <alpineh...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > I am looking to buy a new commuter bike and am thinking of going > > for hub gears instead of derailleur, because of the low > > maintenance and the way they are protected against crud.
> It has completed a short 12000 miles and the hub gear makes it, IMO, an > ideal all rounder bike. On tour the hub gear is virtually maintenance free > in comparison with the derailleur set up, which needs daily cleaning and > attention.
I know that touring is different to commuting, but I'm always a bit nonplussed when folks talk about how hub gears require so much less maintenance than derailleurs. Commuting 100 miles a week all year round I'm up and down the gears all the time and I reckon my der only needs a quick tweak to the cable tension about once a year and is still fine after 20K miles (OK I have replaced the jockey wheels once).
When touring daily ( on a deraileur)and covering about 80 kms a day under full load over various surfaces and in wildly differng conditions, it is hardly amazing that there is a load of crud which collects on chains and cassettes. I certainly did at least a superficial cleaning evey evening beforeI went off for a shower.
However, let me quote as an example one day on my tour to Berlin.
"..... then stayed on the road again to Rühstädt where I had a lovely cold radler and realised that I was covered in dirt and dust from the road and cross winds. I went on and finally arrived at "Dörpkrog am Deich" and I was welcomed with a free beer before being shown round. No charge for the night ..."
I was in fact coverd with a thick layer that almost peeled of my legs and arms. My velo was also similarly covered with the whole frame covered in a layer of grey brown dust. If I had been riding derailleur geared bike the rear cassette and jockey wheels would have been totally clogged up. In the event I just chucked a couple of buckets of water over the bike and went on the next day. In a 5 week tour I only cleaned the chain once and reoiled it -- mainly because I was staying with friends in Berlin. That was the sum total of my maintence on the whole trip. In full loaded touring lasting several weeks with a derailler system I would clean the cassette and jockey wheels every day to ensure smooth riding anf pedalling!
I have just done my prewinter service and will not now do any more until just before I set off on my 2010 tour. It will be washed down a couple of times too!