|
|
uk.net.web.authoring |
Ben In fact, it turns out that the directors of SiteMorse aka And more strangely, although their web site claims Trade marks on So methinks better to steer clear.
> OK so I gave up trying to get any sense out of them at this point. It As Jim has already pointed out, SiteMorse have no proper measuring
> seems that they are unable to give any kind of reference to how their
> speeds are calculated, and as they obviously are wildly different from
> real-world tests it would appear that the results are meaningless, and
> just plain wrong!
method in place, and as you've found out, they just get aggressive
when asked detail quesions.
Business2www.com (lawrence shaw and jon ribbens) have been previously
indicted for fraud, by the SEC in the USA, see:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?q=sitemorse&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm...
various of their brand names, (sitemorse, keymorse etc) none are
listed at the UK patent office, check for yourself at:
http://webdb4.patent.gov.uk/tm/text