Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
A rant about TG and the scene in general
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  9 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Mark C Sammons  
View profile
 More options 3 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: Mark C Sammons <bsc5060@artemis>
Date: 1996/05/03
Subject: A rant about TG and the scene in general

This posting is my own personal opinion.  Here me out:

Without wishing to sound heartless, why  was there no Tribal Gathering
license ages ago?

It seems to me that a lot of this problem is due to the fact that Mean
Fiddler and Universe overlooked  this  one obstacle DESPITE apparently
suffering a similar problem of getting  a license last year.  Yes, the
authorities have  let  us  down,  but  Universe  have  undoubtably put
themselves in a position where we COULD  be let down.  Now, I'm no law
expert and I certainly don't  know  everything  there is to know about
granting of licenses, but was it really required to leave it that late
before putting an application in.  Seeing as everything else was ready
- including exactly where each tent  would go, it seems ludicrous that
such a major point as the license should have been overlooked.

Yeah, its really  shitty  that  events  like  the  Marathon, The Who's
central London concert and the  like  don't  get  stopped for the same
reasons but  they  are  establishment  friendly  events  made  for the
executive  types  who  like  nothing   more  than  sticking  something
completely MOR/AOR on their in-car CD systems as they go home to their
wife and 2 kids.  Most people who were/are going to the TG '96 see the
world as it really is - a place  where  drugs are treated as a norm in
society, a place where at the  end  of  the day sex, race, colour, etc
doesn't matter.  This is the real  world where the Tory Government has
f**ked everything up and our only choice   is to put Labour into power
who's leader is John Major  with  a  nicer smile and better soundbites
and  who's  New   Labour   ethics   are   no   goddam  different  from
Conservative's ethics.  Politicians hate dance  music  because it is a
totally off-cut thing to  what  they  are  used  to.   Yeah, they were
really glad when bands like Oasis  and  Blur  started to get the hype.
Its a nice and safe form  of  music.  They think, Oasis only encourage
the masses to do Cigarettes & Alcohol  - that's nice legal stuff which
we can tax (but I've heard of a drunken brawl - nobody on drugs at any
dance music event  I've  been  to  has  threatened  me).   This is OUR
generation.  For want of a better  word  -  we  are Generation X - the
generation they just can't classify  because  they  have no idea about
the way we lead our lives (those of us who take drugs, or like myself,
don't need them to get you happy at dance events).

My final point is this - I  don't  know  of anyone who has given up on
dance music as a  lost  cause  because  of  the TG's cancellation.  If
anything, this has made dance  music  stronger  and will make everyone
party that little  bit  harder  when  the  TG  finally  happens.  Just
remember everyone, they can't  destroy  dance  music  because music is
one of the strongest things we  have  in  this world.  It allows us to
give peace, love, unity and respect  to  the other people on the scene
because at 98% of dance music events,  everyone is YOUR friend for the
evening and together we  will  survive  and  create  the  music of the
future.

                        P.L.U.R.

                                MARK SAMMONS
                                (bsc5...@dcs.napier.ac.uk)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dale Walker  
View profile
 More options 3 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: d...@virus.com (Dale Walker)
Date: 1996/05/03
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

On Fri, 3 May 1996 09:20:04 +0100, Mark C Sammons <bsc5060@artemis>
wrote:

>This posting is my own personal opinion.  Here me out:

>Without wishing to sound heartless, why  was there no Tribal Gathering
>license ages ago?

But they did, the license was withdrawn by the council at the polices
request. The court case was about Mean Fiddler claiming the withdrawl
was illegal (Well that's how I understood it anyway). It doesn't
matter how early people get licences if the authorities can withdraw
them at the last minute.

What Mean Fiddler should have done was to make triply sure they have
any possibe problem covered just in case. They obviusly didn't in this
case.

/------------------------------------------\
| Dale Walker              d...@virus.com, |
| http://www.gold.net/users/ge75/dale.html |
\------------------------------------------/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Douglas Clinton  
View profile
 More options 3 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: Douglas Clinton <d...@gsl.com>
Date: 1996/05/03
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

Mark C Sammons wrote:

> This posting is my own personal opinion.  Here me out:

<many lines of rant snipped>

Nice one, Mark, 100% agreement with all that.

Thinking about the Who, I have this terrible vision of the world
20 years from now. Back in the sixties and seventies rock groups
were considered in much the same light as dance music of today,
i.e. subversive, leading the youth astray, etc. These days, they
have become the establishment. Do you think the same thing will
happen to dance music in the coming decades with something else
becoming the underground? Imagine parents telling their kids
"Why don't you listen to that nice band Hallucinogen instead of
wasting your time on this modern rubbish?". Huge outcries when
Radio 1 ban Hardfloor songs as being "boring and outdated".

Frightening thought...

plur,
Doug


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Halsey  
View profile
 More options 3 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: Mark_Hal...@intermedia.co.uk (Mark Halsey)
Date: 1996/05/03
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

Doug Clinton said,

>>Thinking about the Who, I have this terrible vision of the world

20 years from now. Back in the sixties and seventies rock groups
were considered in much the same light as dance music of today,
i.e. subversive, leading the youth astray, etc. These days, they
have become the establishment. Do you think the same thing will
happen to dance music in the coming decades with something else
becoming the underground? Imagine parents telling their kids
"Why don't you listen to that nice band Hallucinogen instead of
wasting your time on this modern rubbish?". Huge outcries when
Radio 1 ban Hardfloor songs as being "boring and outdated".

Frightening thought..<<

Doug,

20 years time the concept of 'music' will probably be outta date...... kids
will sit in a virtual rave machine, fill up with designer, safe, substances,
plug in nutrient leads, and prepare to party continuously with their virtual
friends for weeks at a time. There will be virtual doormen in the cyber-rave
whose job is to give out free refill substances and plur to the vibe. Virtual
doormen will clamour to give out the most and best vibes, competing in their
friendly competition where the 'best vibe doorman' as voted by all (if they
want to) receive huggs from all ravers on their way out.  

Rave police will visit at frequent intervals to ensure that everyvirtualone
is happy and people who look miserable will be escorted out in cotton wool
stretchers to be paid attention and loved by the Sargeant back at the
station. Said miserable people, once cured by Seargent Loving Nice Vibe will
be immediately escorted back to the rave by rave police and hugged by all.

The music played will of course be goa trance.

At the end of the rave (or when the kids have had enough) they will emerge
from the machine feeling 100 times better and more loving, respectful,
understanding and refreshed as when they went in. All ravers will have a
personal robot (called mean piddler) which will automatically wind back rave
time so that time spent in the rave is not spent at all.
.
Mark Halsey


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Douglas Clinton  
View profile
 More options 3 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: Douglas Clinton <d...@gsl.com>
Date: 1996/05/03
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

Dale Walker wrote:

> On Fri, 3 May 1996 09:20:04 +0100, Mark C Sammons <bsc5060@artemis>
> wrote:

> >This posting is my own personal opinion.  Here me out:

> >Without wishing to sound heartless, why  was there no Tribal Gathering
> >license ages ago?

> But they did, the license was withdrawn by the council at the polices
> request. The court case was about Mean Fiddler claiming the withdrawl
> was illegal (Well that's how I understood it anyway).

This is all news to me. When was it first issued? All the adverts
for TG said "subject to licence".

Doug


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Stephen Kennedy  
View profile
 More options 3 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: Stephen Kennedy <st...@kalika.demon.co.uk>
Date: 1996/05/03
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

Dale Walker wrote:
> It doesn't
> matter how early people get licences if the authorities can withdraw
> them at the last minute.

> What Mean Fiddler should have done was to make triply sure they have
> any possibe problem covered just in case. They obviusly didn't in this
> case.

Haven't you just contradicted yourself? Or are you saying that it's partly
the "authorities"' fault and partly MF's??

-Steve
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                 "Just what is it that you want to do?"
   "We want to be free... We want to be free to do what we want to do"

  http://users.aol.com/g0lri/   http://users.aol.com/kkingboy/     G0LRI
----------------------------------------------------------------------


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dale Walker  
View profile
 More options 4 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: d...@virus.com (Dale Walker)
Date: 1996/05/04
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

On Fri, 3 May 1996 22:41:59 GMT, Stephen Kennedy

<st...@kalika.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Dale Walker wrote:
>> It doesn't
>> matter how early people get licences if the authorities can withdraw
>> them at the last minute.

>> What Mean Fiddler should have done was to make triply sure they have
>> any possibe problem covered just in case. They obviusly didn't in this
>> case.

>Haven't you just contradicted yourself? Or are you saying that it's partly
>the "authorities"' fault and partly MF's??

Sort of! What I'm saying is, Mean Fiddler should have expected extra
problems by the authorities even though an initial licence may have
been granted and should have prepared detailed contingency plans.

/------------------------------------------\
| Dale Walker              d...@virus.com, |
| http://www.gold.net/users/ge75/dale.html |
\------------------------------------------/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dale Walker  
View profile
 More options 4 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: d...@virus.com (Dale Walker)
Date: 1996/05/04
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

On Fri, 03 May 1996 18:24:51 +0100, Douglas Clinton <d...@gsl.com>
wrote:

But I remember (possibly wrongly) the first reports of problems were
that the 'License was withdrawn by the council'. Having something
withdrawn sounds like it was taken away from them, not not given to
them in the first place. I very much doubt Mean Fiddler would have
spent that much money on something without a reasonable chance of it
coming off. Mean Fiddler although money grabbing do have a track
record of pulling off big events and there's no way I can see them
doing something as big as TG without permission.

>Doug

/------------------------------------------\
| Dale Walker              d...@virus.com, |
| http://www.gold.net/users/ge75/dale.html |
\------------------------------------------/

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Max Edwards  
View profile
 More options 7 May 1996, 08:00
Newsgroups: uk.music.rave
From: m...@minster.york.ac.uk (Max Edwards)
Date: 1996/05/07
Subject: Re: A rant about TG and the scene in general

: 20 years time the concept of 'music' will probably be outta date...... kids
: will sit in a virtual rave machine, fill up with designer, safe, substances,
: plug in nutrient leads, and prepare to party continuously with their virtual
: friends for weeks at a time. There will be virtual doormen in the cyber-rave
: whose job is to give out free refill substances and plur to the vibe. Virtual
: doormen will clamour to give out the most and best vibes, competing in their
: friendly competition where the 'best vibe doorman' as voted by all (if they
: want to) receive huggs from all ravers on their way out.  

<Rest of article including hilarious Sergeant Nice Vibe type bloke snipped
like a snippy thing that's just recently been snipped>

Marvellous... I am planning a cartoon strip in which an alien lands, gets
out of his craft saying "I'm off to that rave" - he trots off to Rave
Mountain where he can be seen leaping around in the crowd giving it some
sproing factor. Time passes - now is then - and the people move down to
Chill City above which hovers a cloud of fragrant smoke.  Here the people
laugh and may draw their ideas, minds merge and people love a little more,
grudge a little less.

By the way all of the above is true (I can't substantiate the alien bit, but
it might have been me in an abstract metaphorical way) and it happened last
saturday night/sunday morning at the best house party I've ever been to.
Thanks to Karen, Gid, and all of the lovely York people who I just love love
love love love

keep rising you lovely lovelies

Max


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google