Message from discussion
If Karen Winter disappeared from trendy urban areas...
Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!ee405dca!not-for-mail
From: Jonathan Ball <jonb...@whitehouse.not>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,misc.rural,alt.agriculture,sci.agriculture,alt.sustainable.agriculture
Subject: Re: If Karen Winter disappeared from trendy urban areas...
References: <GyVLb.2824$PP5.2081@bignews4.bellsouth.net> <btph59$phk$1@reader2.nmix.net> <c5c0e6e6.0401111821.1a7869e2@posting.google.com> <btuiaf$kh2$1@reader2.nmix.net>
In-Reply-To: <btuiaf$kh2$1@reader2.nmix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <QxAMb.6573$zj7.3539@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:10:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.164.68.157
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net 1073927408 68.164.68.157 (Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:10:08 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:10:08 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Rat & Swan wrote:
>
>
> ta wrote:
>
>> Rat & Swan <lab...@cybermesa.com> wrote in message
>> news:<btph59$phk$1@reader2.nmix.net>...
>
>
>>> ta wrote:
>
>
>>>> from the face of the earth tommorrow and all of the land used for
>>>> animal
>>>> production was to be used for non-animal food production, what would
>>>> be the
>>>> short and long-term economic, ecological, and social consequences
>>>> (both good
>>>> and bad)? Has anyone studied this possibility and published it?
>
>
> ...Ecology is always a tricky subject
It completely flummoxes YOU. You don't know anything
about it, and don't care to learn.
> Again, reducing human population would be critical to success.
> I think we should consider that we could do much more in terms of
> re-creating more of a gathering culture than we have now.
> There is no reason why humans couldn't harvest foods from wild
> areas
There is no valid reason you can't get your fat ass the
hell out of trendy urban areas and into the wild areas
RIGHT NOW.