|
|
talk.politics.animals |
> ta wrote: >> Rat & Swan <lab...@cybermesa.com> wrote in message >>> ta wrote: >>>> from the face of the earth tommorrow and all of the land used for > ...Ecology is always a tricky subject Rat & Swan wrote: It completely flummoxes YOU. You don't know anything
>> <news:btph59$phk$1@reader2.nmix.net>...
>>>> animal
>>>> production was to be used for non-animal food production, what would
>>>> be the
>>>> short and long-term economic, ecological, and social consequences
>>>> (both good
>>>> and bad)? Has anyone studied this possibility and published it?
about it, and don't care to learn.
> Again, reducing human population would be critical to success. There is no valid reason you can't get your fat ass the
> I think we should consider that we could do much more in terms of
> re-creating more of a gathering culture than we have now.
> There is no reason why humans couldn't harvest foods from wild
> areas
hell out of trendy urban areas and into the wild areas
RIGHT NOW.