Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian, talk.politics.animals
From: dh...@yahoo.com (David N. Harrison)
Date: 1999/10/19
Subject: Re: Better to be an ethical meat eater, than an ethical veg*n.
Jonathan Ball <jonb...@earthlink.net> wrote: I'm not saying that it's unfair to them to not let them be born, since >"David N. Harrison" wrote: >> [...] >> The new entities that I am discussing will only come >Okay, so you say you're not talking about some kind of "pre-born" being, with >So - in what sense is it unfair "to the animals" to prevent them from being they don't exist, and all that. But. There are people who don't eat meat because they want to "save" animals from being killed. It doesn't work like that though. The animals will be killed, whether they eat them or not. It's too late to worry about the animals that are alive now, unless they buy some and release them, or whatever. Future animals are what people influence by what they consume, not the animals that are alive at the moment.... those animals are being influenced by what the consumers did in the past. What I'm saying is unfair for the animals that *could* get to live, is for people not to consider the fact that they are only keeping these animals from being killed, by keeping them from getting to live at all. This only applies to the people who haven't given that aspect of what they are doing the consideration that they should...it is a very important aspect IMO. After taking that into consideration, this type of discussion could move on into the different pros and cons of letting these animals experience life. And which animals to encourage life for and which ones not to, etc (yes dammit, there are "and others" details that could be discussed...plenty of them in fact). So far however, the few people who have even gotten as far as actually discussing future animals (or whatever you want to call them...come up with a better term if you want...) have indicated that they feel the same way about *all* animals that we raise for food. Since there are so many different ways that the animals are raised, it is not fair to think of the quality of life of all these animals in the same way. But apparently a discussion about details like that is beyond their interest or ability. Since I'm going on about all this, I'll mention a couple of other things. As you have so helpfully pointed out: I'm not good at this shit. One reason for that is that I don't like it much. I also keep running into the same arguments over and over, which is why I have developed the stock answer plan. That helps to move on into the discussion with new people, without causing me to waste any more time than I have to. The discussion so far hasn't gone far enough that anyone has actually discussed which animals they feel may have lives that are worth living, or what might be done to encourage better lives for them, or anything like that. The fact that I thought that it might eventually get that far, and maybe even turn into something that could some day become constructive instead of just a bunch of arguing, is another indication that I'm a fuckin' moron I guess... but I still haven't given up hope entirely, which is why I keep on with it. To me this is an important thing, even if to no one else. All I can do is try or not try, so I keep trying in my own half ass way. I pay my $19.95/month for internet access, so I feel that I have as much right as anyone to use it. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||