> I have to ask: Who are you trying to put down, who put you up to this and > what do you stand to gain by promoting this "unique" idea?
James, I am not trying to put ANYONE down.
NOBODY but myself determines my actions.
I personally stand to gain NOTHING, but -extreme- pleasure in knowing that animals aren't suffering, that all people have the space and resources to live with abundance; enjoying health and vitality, and that the ecosphere is recovering well, all wild species thriving.
The idea is hardly unique. Plant foods have always made up a primary part of humans' diet, even all or nearly all of it, in many cultures around the globe until very recently.
Hope that answers your questions to your satisfaction. :)
> Nope. It's true. You are a mental defective, a > marginal, a SELF MARGINALIZED and SELF ALIENATED goof > whom no one takes seriously. You have absolutely zero > political influence. Actually, most people have zero > political influence, but that's because they don't > consider it worth their while to try to exert any, > apart from (maybe) voting in scheduled elections. But > YOU: you have none, because you COULDN'T have any. > You're a null.
Yeah, yeah.
I've over one-hundred posts containing solid ass-kicks squarely landing on to ~jonnyboil's~ butt from many different people, both regular participants and others, in a folder titled 'boil', collated since Jan'. So I decided to waste a little time putting a sampling on a web page (~Jonnie~ appears to think that sort of thing alright after all), showing what people across the board-- civilised society at large, think of this mental defective, this SELF MARGINALIZED and SELF ALIENATED thug. http://www.iol.ie/~creature/boiled%20ball.html (in progress).
> ye olde stiff-lipped wanker wrote: > <...> > >>Many recent studies conclude that veg-ns are at a higher risk than any > >>other group for eating disorders. This has led some to hypothesize that > >>veg-nism itself is an eating disorder.
> > More crap from US. Where these many recent studies? Who are these that > > hypothesize that veg-nism itself is an eating disorder?
> > There was ONE article about the relationship between those who CLAIM to be > > vegetarians and eating disorders.
> NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - College-aged women who describe themselves > as vegetarians are more likely to be concerned with their weight and be > at risk of developing an eating disorder, a small study suggests.
> >>>>Babies are much more attracted to the taste of meat than the taste of > >>>>vegetables, as well. Before my daughter was old enough to eat table
> > food, I
> >>>>was holding her while I ate and she wanted the pork chop I was eating so
> > I
> >>>>let her taste it and she grabbed it with both hands and started happily > >>>>sucking on that meaty bone. She wasn't too interested in the broccoli > >>>>though :-)
> >>>More's the pity, I don't ever recall seeing a 300lb unhealthy broccoli > >>>eater!
> >>See Derek Nash.
> >>>then some people also seem to use food as an emotional crutch, how > >>>daft is that?
> >>I know plenty of plump veg-ns. I wonder if Ronny's lost any of her > >>weight yet.
> >>>Most of them seem to operate in these groups, just as well IQ is not > >>>measured in pounds.
> >>Many recent studies conclude that veg-ns are at a higher risk than any > >>other group for eating disorders. This has led some to hypothesize that > >>veg-nism itself is an eating disorder.
> > More crap from US. Where these many recent studies?
> See? You really *are* a dirty little > English-as-second-language wog, aren't you? What the > FUCK does "where these many recent studies?" mean, > GregGeo...I mean, FuckHar?
At least I know how to spell 'KNOW'. I least I don't have hairy droopy tits.
> > Who are these that > > hypothesize that veg-nism itself is an eating disorder?
> *I* hypothesize it. Actually, in my expert opinion, I > characterize it as a broader mental illness: > Pathological Auto-alienation. It stems from premature > and overly aggressive toilet training. It is > considered a condition amenable to treatment. Let me > know if you'd like a referral to a specialist.
> I KNEW you would cop out. If I was as smart > as you claim you are, I'd show her what for and > take that test right now. You can beat her in > anything. Don't be a nebbish.
> > That's not an objective IQ test, you wretched dolt.
> You can beat her in any IQ test, surely. Take the > test. Don't let 135 startle you. What would Lance > Armstrong do if he saw you cry off to a girl, pussy? > Take it and shut her up for good. Do you have an > account with 'Paypal'? We could make it interesting.
Careful, or I might REALLY apply myself and go raise that score a notch or few. ;).
> > I KNEW you would cop out. If I was as smart > > as you claim you are, I'd show her what for and > > take that test right now. You can beat her in > > anything. Don't be a nebbish.
> > > That's not an objective IQ test, you wretched dolt.
> > You can beat her in any IQ test, surely. Take the > > test. Don't let 135 startle you. What would Lance > > Armstrong do if he saw you cry off to a girl, pussy? > > Take it and shut her up for good. Do you have an > > account with 'Paypal'? We could make it interesting.
> Careful, or I might REALLY apply myself and go > raise that score a notch or few. ;).
I think I *ought* to as well, for pride's sake if nothing else, but I didn't know you could have more than one stab at it. You don't honestly think our sassy suspect hasn't already completed that test yet, do you? He got a lower score than 135 and wants to run from this one, or cycle. Even a space hopper'll do, "all the way into the Texas hill country (yes, the same steep terrain where Lance Armstrong trains) for a little over 100 miles."
> <..> > > I have to ask: Who are you trying to put down, who put you up to this and > > what do you stand to gain by promoting this "unique" idea?
> James, I am not trying to put ANYONE down.
> NOBODY but myself determines my actions.
> I personally stand to gain NOTHING, but -extreme- > pleasure in knowing that animals aren't suffering, that > all people have the space and resources to live with > abundance; enjoying health and vitality, and that the > ecosphere is recovering well, all wild species thriving.
> The idea is hardly unique. Plant foods have always made > up a primary part of humans' diet, even all or nearly all > of it, in many cultures around the globe until very recently.
> Hope that answers your questions to your satisfaction. :)
> <..>
Lady, you are pissin' against a stiff wind. So before getting your panties an a wad why not find a sympathetic and less educated audience for you earth shaking repetitious blather. One would think you may have caught on to the fact this off kilter line of malarkey hasn't impressed thinking people at any time in near recorded history.
You spend an inordinate amount of time fine tuning your recitals just to amuse folks who are not receptive to any part of it. This is an agricultural group and most who frequent it are financially and duty bound to support the products they raise.
"Most of the rhetoric >snip< will sooner or later point at an industry or group which has in some way come into disfavor with some someone who wants to make a racket"
And that is where you come in. These folks are of much stronger metal than your type and will not be swayed the least from what they believe is right. From this point of view you are just a pain in the ass.
The further you pursue this the more ridiculous you appear. Your cut and paste items somewhat belie your claim of "NOBODY but myself determines my actions." You come across on this group as a minion of someone else and not wound too tightly either. Perhaps an enlistment in sci.occult would be more gratifying
If you are indeed determining your own actions as you claim there is probably a chance to salvage something from your efforts. A start would be to enroll in an educational course which deals in nutrition and does not enter into the mythology and heresy aspects of an interesting topic. Another aspect of learning is to avoid developing relationships with the educators in either a mental, physical or spiritual nature which cloud the real lesson. You have, on the other hand, developed a love affair with a topic, and perhaps its perpetrators, whose merits are dubious at best.
> > > I KNEW you would cop out. If I was as smart > > > as you claim you are, I'd show her what for and > > > take that test right now. You can beat her in > > > anything. Don't be a nebbish.
> > > > That's not an objective IQ test, you wretched dolt.
> > > You can beat her in any IQ test, surely. Take the > > > test. Don't let 135 startle you. What would Lance > > > Armstrong do if he saw you cry off to a girl, pussy? > > > Take it and shut her up for good. Do you have an > > > account with 'Paypal'? We could make it interesting.
> > Careful, or I might REALLY apply myself and go > > raise that score a notch or few. ;).
> I think I *ought* to as well, for pride's sake if > nothing else, but I didn't know you could have > more than one stab at it. You don't honestly > think our sassy suspect hasn't already completed > that test yet, do you? He got a lower score than > 135 and wants to run from this one, or cycle. > Even a space hopper'll do, "all the way into the > Texas hill country (yes, the same steep terrain > where Lance Armstrong trains) for a little over > 100 miles."
lol. Go for it. Of course it figures that boilboy and malcolm M...@indaal.demon.co.uk tried too, but crawled in -sore- without anything to crow about.
> > I KNEW it would be an online test. That's not an objective IQ test, you > > wretched dolt. > (- sent at 18.50GMT)
> We all are aware of 'usual suspect's narcissistic tendencies, his > competitive streak, etc, so whom amongst us could ever doubt > that he took this test but scored lower than myself? Pathetic.
Narcissism, no. Egotism, yes. I'm a Texan after all; it's hard to be humble. Let me set off my results so you can't miss (like so many other things which go STRAIGHT over your head):
********************************************************************* ************************** My Test Result *************************** ********************************************************************* Score: 142
From their e-mail offering me a custom IQ report -- complete with an analysis of my unique traits -- for the paltry sum of $15:
Usual, you are an Insightful Linguist.
Did you know?
This means you have the natural fluency of a writer and the visual talents of an artist. You also have a creative and expressive mind.
Sounds more like a horoscope to me than an appraisal of my intellect. It also failed to tell me anything I didn't already know about myself. It's also substantially lower than the legitimate IQ test given when I was a child.
> 'Different from the IQ test, the EIQ measures how you handle daily > interactions and conflicts, how you survive on a day-to-day basis. '
I don't suffer fools at all, but I get along quite well with others. :-)
> > I've no patience for pseudo-scientific tests which ask me to compare > > pictures of people making faces. > Commiserations, 'usual suspect', your EIQ score is 0
I give myself a gold star for not wasting my time since I already know I have the natural fluency of a writer and the visual talents of an artist -- a result of my creative, expressive mind.
Speaking of my expressive abilities, can you guess what I'd express right now if I weren't so polite, pendejo?
fisted twink wrote: >>I KNEW it would be an online test.
> I KNEW you would cop out. If I was as smart > as you claim you are, I'd show her what for and > take that test right now. You can beat her in > anything. Don't be a nebbish.
Already done and posted, asshole.
>>That's not an objective IQ test, you wretched dolt.
> You can beat her in any IQ test, surely.
I did.
> Take the test.
I did.
> Don't let 135 startle you.
I didn't.
> What would Lance Armstrong do if he saw you cry off
> to a girl, pussy?
Go fuck yourself, Dreck. What was YOUR score?
> Take it and shut her up for good. Do you have an > account with 'Paypal'? We could make it interesting.
I would never take advantage of anyone who lives off the graces of government charity.
> I personally stand to gain NOTHING, but -extreme- > pleasure in knowing that animals aren't suffering, that
Most animals will suffer TREMENDOUSLY as long as there's predation, whether humans prey or not. I hope it gives you "-extreme-" pleasure to know baby lions are sleeping with full bellies because their mothers caused other animals to suffer.
> all people have the space and resources to live with > abundance; enjoying health and vitality, and that the > ecosphere is recovering well, all wild species thriving.
Thriving requires sacrifice and suffering, you nitwit.
> The idea is hardly unique. Plant foods have always made > up a primary part of humans' diet, even all or nearly all > of it, in many cultures around the globe until very recently.
Most people also died before age 50.
> Hope that answers your questions to your satisfaction. :)
When was the last time you satisfied a man? How much did it cost him?
>>> > > I KNEW you would cop out. If I was as smart >>> > > as you claim you are, I'd show her what for and >>> > > take that test right now. You can beat her in >>> > > anything. Don't be a nebbish.
>>> > > > That's not an objective IQ test, you wretched dolt.
>>> > > You can beat her in any IQ test, surely. Take the >>> > > test. Don't let 135 startle you. What would Lance >>> > > Armstrong do if he saw you cry off to a girl, pussy? >>> > > Take it and shut her up for good. Do you have an >>> > > account with 'Paypal'? We could make it interesting.
>>> > Careful, or I might REALLY apply myself and go >>> > raise that score a notch or few. ;).
>>> I think I *ought* to as well, for pride's sake if >>> nothing else, but I didn't know you could have >>> more than one stab at it. You don't honestly >>> think our sassy suspect hasn't already completed >>> that test yet, do you? He got a lower score than >>> 135 and wants to run from this one, or cycle. >>> Even a space hopper'll do, "all the way into the >>> Texas hill country (yes, the same steep terrain >>> where Lance Armstrong trains) for a little over >>> 100 miles."
>>lol. Go for it. Of course it figures that boilboy and >>malcolm M...@indaal.demon.co.uk tried too, but >>crawled in -sore- without anything to crow about.
>Yes, well, you're rather good at spouting rubbish, aren't you? I haven't >tried the test because it has no more relationship to a proper IQ test >than the rubbish you post has to the truth.
No doubt it would be harder to achieve then your internet degree, bought from degreesRus? Go on, give it a go, you never know you may discover you didn't need to pay £15 for a forged degree after all, I very much doubt it...lol
>The fact that not only did you take the test but then crowed about your >"high" score says all that is needed to be said about your obvious >insecurities.
Certainly seems to have got you flustered...go on, we promise not to laugh at the result! --
So, you dont like reasoned, well thought out, civil debate?
> > I personally stand to gain NOTHING, but -extreme- > > pleasure in knowing that animals aren't suffering, that > > all people have the space and resources to live with > > abundance; enjoying health and vitality, and that the > > ecosphere is recovering well, all wild species thriving.
> > The idea is hardly unique. Plant foods have always made > > up a primary part of humans' diet, even all or nearly all > > of it, in many cultures around the globe until very recently.
> > Hope that answers your questions to your satisfaction. :)
> > <..>
> Lady, you are pissin' against a stiff wind. So before getting your panties > an a wad why not find a sympathetic and less educated audience for you earth > shaking repetitious blather. One would think you may have caught on to the > fact this off kilter line of malarkey hasn't impressed thinking people at > any time in near recorded history.
> You spend an inordinate amount of time fine tuning your recitals just to > amuse folks who are not receptive to any part of it. This is an agricultural > group and most who frequent it are financially and duty bound to support the > products they raise.
> "Most of the rhetoric >snip< will sooner or later point at an industry or > group which has in some way > come into disfavor with some someone who wants to make a racket"
> And that is where you come in. These folks are of much stronger metal than > your type and will not be swayed the least from what they believe is right. > From this point of view you are just a pain in the ass.
> The further you pursue this the more ridiculous you appear. Your cut and > paste items somewhat belie your claim of "NOBODY but myself determines my > actions." > You come across on this group as a minion of someone else and not wound too > tightly either. Perhaps an enlistment in sci.occult would be more gratifying
> If you are indeed determining your own actions as you claim there is > probably a chance to salvage something from your efforts. A start would be > to enroll in an educational course which deals in nutrition and does not > enter into the mythology and heresy aspects of an interesting topic. Another > aspect of learning is to avoid developing relationships with the educators > in either a mental, physical or spiritual nature which cloud the real > lesson. You have, on the other hand, developed a love affair with a topic, > and perhaps its perpetrators, whose merits are dubious at best.
> Thank you
> James Curts
Well, you too are entitled to your opinion, ignorant as it may be.
our village idiot wrote: > It appears that my server is failing to relay some of my posts, > or at least they are not appearing on my newsreader (yet).
How on *earth* do you cope with such turmoil in your life?
> I will take a pause in posting, and hope that normal > service will resume shortly.
Thanks for keeping us apprised of your latest calamity, though we probably wouldn't have noticed the difference.
first of twits wrote: > I think I *ought* to as well, for pride's sake if > nothing else, but I didn't know you could have > more than one stab at it. You don't honestly > think our sassy suspect hasn't already completed > that test yet, do you? He got a lower score than > 135 and wants to run from this one, or cycle.
I scored 142.
> Even a space hopper'll do, "all the way into the > Texas hill country (yes, the same steep terrain > where Lance Armstrong trains) for a little over > 100 miles."
Lard ass, you can't even waddle to your favorite pub or chip shop.
> > > I KNEW it would be an online test. That's not an objective IQ test, you > > > wretched dolt. > > (- sent at 18.50GMT)
> > We all are aware of 'usual suspect's narcissistic tendencies, his > > competitive streak, etc, so whom amongst us could ever doubt > > that he took this test but scored lower than myself? Pathetic.
> Narcissism, no. Egotism, yes. I'm a Texan after all; it's hard to be > humble. Let me set off my results so you can't miss (like so many other > things which go STRAIGHT over your head):
> ********************************************************************* > ************************** My Test Result *************************** > ********************************************************************* > Score: 142
Link to that result?
> From their e-mail offering me a custom IQ report -- complete with an > analysis of my unique traits -- for the paltry sum of $15:
> Usual, you are an Insightful Linguist.
IOW, you have a talent for sophism. We already knew that.
> Did you know?
> This means you have the natural fluency of > a writer and the visual talents of an artist. > You also have a creative and expressive mind.
Yes, which you put to use telling tall tales, like; biting off the head of a snake when you were a baby.
> >> > > I KNEW you would cop out. If I was as smart > >> > > as you claim you are, I'd show her what for and > >> > > take that test right now. You can beat her in > >> > > anything. Don't be a nebbish.
> >> > > > That's not an objective IQ test, you wretched dolt.
> >> > > You can beat her in any IQ test, surely. Take the > >> > > test. Don't let 135 startle you. What would Lance > >> > > Armstrong do if he saw you cry off to a girl, pussy? > >> > > Take it and shut her up for good. Do you have an > >> > > account with 'Paypal'? We could make it interesting.
> >> > Careful, or I might REALLY apply myself and go > >> > raise that score a notch or few. ;).
> >> I think I *ought* to as well, for pride's sake if > >> nothing else, but I didn't know you could have > >> more than one stab at it. You don't honestly > >> think our sassy suspect hasn't already completed > >> that test yet, do you? He got a lower score than > >> 135 and wants to run from this one, or cycle. > >> Even a space hopper'll do, "all the way into the > >> Texas hill country (yes, the same steep terrain > >> where Lance Armstrong trains) for a little over > >> 100 miles."
> >lol. Go for it. Of course it figures that boilboy and > >malcolm M...@indaal.demon.co.uk tried too, but > >crawled in -sore- without anything to crow about.
> Yes, well, you're rather good at spouting rubbish, aren't you? I haven't > tried the test because it has no more relationship to a proper IQ test > than the rubbish you post has to the truth.
> The fact that not only did you take the test but then crowed about your > "high" score says all that is needed to be said about your obvious > insecurities.
"usual suspect" <abovegro...@earth.man> wrote in message news:3F11A729.6010505@earth.man... > our village idiot wrote: > > Careful, or I might REALLY apply myself and go > > raise that score a notch or few. ;).
> That's one of the problems with such tests. Studying for an IQ test > makes it beside the point.
Study for it? No, just take a little more time and care than I did.
Link to *yours*? That ...result.jsp# link you provided is the same as mine. Clear your cache and click on your own link and see what happens (if you're scared or something, it merely redirects to the first page of the iq test). Anyway, I took your word that you managed to score 135; you'll have to take mine.
>> From their e-mail offering me a custom IQ report -- complete with an >>analysis of my unique traits -- for the paltry sum of $15:
>>Usual, you are an Insightful Linguist.
> IOW, you have a talent for sophism. We already knew that.
I don't practice sophistry, but I've noticed that you've perfected it.
>>Did you know?
>>This means you have the natural fluency of >>a writer and the visual talents of an artist. >>You also have a creative and expressive mind.
> Yes, which you put to use telling tall tales, like; biting > off the head of a snake when you were a baby.
It's not *my* "tall tale." It's my mother's, father's, grandparents', pastor's, doctor's, etc. I've never had reason to doubt any of them.
> <snip usual ego-tripping self-promotion>
Hahahahaha... you can't handle the truth. Go zap yourself, pendejo.
> wrote: > <snip> > > I personally stand to gain NOTHING, but -extreme- > > pleasure in knowing that animals aren't suffering, that
> Most animals will suffer TREMENDOUSLY as long as there's predation, > whether humans prey or not. I hope it gives you "-extreme-" pleasure to > know baby lions are sleeping with full bellies because their mothers > caused other animals to suffer.
Suffering UNECESSARILLY.
> > all people have the space and resources to live with > > abundance; enjoying health and vitality, and that the > > ecosphere is recovering well, all wild species thriving.
> Thriving requires sacrifice and suffering, you nitwit.
It also means living and pleasure, butthead.
> > The idea is hardly unique. Plant foods have always made > > up a primary part of humans' diet, even all or nearly all > > of it, in many cultures around the globe until very recently.
> Most people also died before age 50.
Your evidence for that?
> > Hope that answers your questions to your satisfaction. :)
> When was the last time you satisfied a man? How much did it cost him?
"usual suspect" <abovegro...@earth.man> wrote in message news:3F11AB49.5040209@earth.man... > pearl wrote: > > Study for it? No, just take a little more time and care than I did.
> I wasted about four minutes on it. I'm sure I could've done better with > the matching block items had I taken more time.
|
