<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>talk.origins Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins</link>
  <description>Evolution versus creationism (sometimes hot!). (Moderated)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Independent Hard Evidence: From Adam to Noah</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/0ea6a4a6bd7b3125/7e41e79829e82989?show_docid=7e41e79829e82989</link>
  <description>
  Nothing, from the All Stinking I(diot)? Not even a smarmy adolescent &lt;br&gt; quip? &lt;br&gt; Gee. i wonder why? &lt;br&gt; Boikat
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/0ea6a4a6bd7b3125/7e41e79829e82989?show_docid=7e41e79829e82989</guid>
  <author>
  boi...@bellsouth.net
  (Boikat)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 04:16:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: very frightening</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/85e49449c8952204/336781cd432acbef?show_docid=336781cd432acbef</link>
  <description>
  heekster &amp;lt;heeks...@ifiwxtc.net&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; Visited? Hell, I lived there. Even went to high school there. &lt;br&gt; But I never, ever, ate lutefisk.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/85e49449c8952204/336781cd432acbef?show_docid=336781cd432acbef</guid>
  <author>
  foo.dic...@gmail.com
  (Dick C.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 04:11:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: &#39;Theistic Selection&#39; as opposed to &#39;Theistic Evolution&#39;</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/576de25224fc872a/108b088e340daf33?show_docid=108b088e340daf33</link>
  <description>
  Changes to germline cells may be passed on to the next generation, thus these &lt;br&gt; changes are heritable. Changes to somatic cells are not passed along and so &lt;br&gt; are not heritable. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Randomness&amp;quot; has multiple meanings and it would be helpful to note which one &lt;br&gt; you&#39;re using. Mutations are not random in the sense that they are drawn from
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/576de25224fc872a/108b088e340daf33?show_docid=108b088e340daf33</guid>
  <author>
  cartographi...@gfnordmail.com
  (Garamond Lethe)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 04:02:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Forrest under the mistaken belief that the Pope teaches evolutionism</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/ce04ca84d773ec96/c784b8c46025b7ad?show_docid=c784b8c46025b7ad</link>
  <description>
  [snip] &lt;br&gt; Ah, you just hit the soft spot. 100 years ago the Church would have said &lt;br&gt; absolutely no other genetic material was involved. Today we say leave &lt;br&gt; science to the scientists, then go stare at a portrait of Aquinas.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/ce04ca84d773ec96/c784b8c46025b7ad?show_docid=c784b8c46025b7ad</guid>
  <author>
  macaddic...@removethisca.rr.com
  (macaddicted)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 02:58:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Forrest under the mistaken belief that the Pope teaches evolutionism</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/ce04ca84d773ec96/f9cc4c4e238507a6?show_docid=f9cc4c4e238507a6</link>
  <description>
  [snip] &lt;br&gt; Except that I&#39;m not saying it happened a few, or even several thousand &lt;br&gt; years ago. I&#39;m also not saying that special creation was involved. &lt;br&gt; Lastly, the nature of the &amp;quot;spread&amp;quot; of sin does not preclude &lt;br&gt; pre-adamites, though this line of theology is not mainstream.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/ce04ca84d773ec96/f9cc4c4e238507a6?show_docid=f9cc4c4e238507a6</guid>
  <author>
  macaddic...@removethisca.rr.com
  (macaddicted)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 02:58:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Answer to Augray</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/e8d70b0a20d3963b/654c0c9aa3aa7515?show_docid=654c0c9aa3aa7515</link>
  <description>
  Ray&#39;s going to need the proper pronunciation of &amp;quot;canibal&amp;quot; as it comes &lt;br&gt; from Cain and Able, or cannon ball, or some such.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/e8d70b0a20d3963b/654c0c9aa3aa7515?show_docid=654c0c9aa3aa7515</guid>
  <author>
  macaddic...@removethisca.rr.com
  (macaddicted)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 02:58:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The problem Forrest calls &quot;small&quot; is the linch pin of the whole</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/ce04ca84d773ec96/b9d18f2bc3327baa?show_docid=b9d18f2bc3327baa</link>
  <description>
  No, John is right. You got it wrong again, Ray. How long will it take you &lt;br&gt; to admit your mistake? &lt;br&gt; What do you think &amp;quot;punctuated&amp;quot; means, Ray? &lt;br&gt; Here&#39;s Gould&#39;s own description: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_comes-of-age.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;We realized that a standard biological account. Mayr&#39;s peripatric theory or
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/ce04ca84d773ec96/b9d18f2bc3327baa?show_docid=b9d18f2bc3327baa</guid>
  <author>
  reddfr...@bresnan.net
  (Dana Tweedy)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:58:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Misconceptions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/c9e1cfc819c2042f/bf11d9df8b381e8f?show_docid=bf11d9df8b381e8f</link>
  <description>
  Morontheist &amp;quot;evolutionguru&amp;quot;: &lt;br&gt; Mistake in OP corrected for everyone&#39;s convenience.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/c9e1cfc819c2042f/bf11d9df8b381e8f?show_docid=bf11d9df8b381e8f</guid>
  <author>
  mailtosecret...@carcosa.de
  (Thurisaz the Einherjer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:51:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Biblical Archaeology: Evidence of the Exodus from Egypt</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/cfb4f7e0e75ff37c/555a977b3fb667e6?show_docid=555a977b3fb667e6</link>
  <description>
  On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:22:38 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans &lt;br&gt; Once in a book I found a reference to a place in the KJV OT where &lt;br&gt; the copyist had obviously included some proofreader&#39;s comments. I &lt;br&gt; looked it up and it sure convinced me that it happened. I wrote &lt;br&gt; the book, chapter and verse in the frontispiece of the Bible, but
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/cfb4f7e0e75ff37c/555a977b3fb667e6?show_docid=555a977b3fb667e6</guid>
  <author>
  hatu...@cox.net
  (Hatunen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:23:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Biblical Archaeology: Evidence of the Exodus from Egypt</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/cfb4f7e0e75ff37c/469974118d774540?show_docid=469974118d774540</link>
  <description>
  We know that rainfall totals are higher for smaller areas and shorter &lt;br&gt; durations. Cherrapunji, India, has apparently recorded a total of 366 &lt;br&gt; inches of rain in one month. One can see that an event like that would &lt;br&gt; be remembered for a long time, and would be a good candidate for a &lt;br&gt; legendary account like that of Noah.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/cfb4f7e0e75ff37c/469974118d774540?show_docid=469974118d774540</guid>
  <author>
  wdnospammo...@verizon.net
  (William Morse)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:19:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Answer to Augray (was howler slander topic)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/e8d70b0a20d3963b/552b0802bdfcdb1e?show_docid=552b0802bdfcdb1e</link>
  <description>
  On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:33:13 -0800 (PST), Ray Martinez &lt;br&gt; When I was stationed at fort Knox in the early 1960s our unit had &lt;br&gt; to go to training sessions in the base theater that were more &lt;br&gt; like indoctrination sessions. &lt;br&gt; At one point we were pretty much blown away when the master &lt;br&gt; sergeant who conducted the trainings finished up a patriotic
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/e8d70b0a20d3963b/552b0802bdfcdb1e?show_docid=552b0802bdfcdb1e</guid>
  <author>
  hatu...@cox.net
  (Hatunen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:17:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Howler slander topic</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/e8d70b0a20d3963b/602c13bada6c71c5?show_docid=602c13bada6c71c5</link>
  <description>
  Who said anything about submitting? The scientific community (see that &lt;br&gt; word &amp;quot;community&amp;quot;) is a community of equals, of peers. If one intends to &lt;br&gt; refute a scientific theory, there are two things that one must do: have &lt;br&gt; one&#39;s argument properly thought through and well supported, and present &lt;br&gt; that argument to the community for its consideration and eventual agreement.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/e8d70b0a20d3963b/602c13bada6c71c5?show_docid=602c13bada6c71c5</guid>
  <author>
  kar...@sympatico.ca
  (Caranx latus)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:16:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: &#39;Theistic Selection&#39; as opposed to &#39;Theistic Evolution&#39;</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/576de25224fc872a/0427822e74c35bc2?show_docid=0427822e74c35bc2</link>
  <description>
  What brings about &#39;heritable changes&#39;? &lt;br&gt; Leaving God out of the picture leaves Nature&#39;s influence to &lt;br&gt; randomness. &lt;br&gt; Natural &#39;Selection&#39; brings about change that suits environmental &lt;br&gt; variables. &lt;br&gt; Mutation is by definition &#39;change&#39;.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/576de25224fc872a/0427822e74c35bc2?show_docid=0427822e74c35bc2</guid>
  <author>
  cecilcr...@hotmail.com
  (Scanman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:14:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: did man walk on the moon...and creationism.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/16c6284423c3733e/658dc27ef3174974?show_docid=658dc27ef3174974</link>
  <description>
  On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:27:42 -0800 (PST), Suzanne &lt;br&gt; Scientific American had an article about this back in the early &lt;br&gt; 1950s....
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/16c6284423c3733e/658dc27ef3174974?show_docid=658dc27ef3174974</guid>
  <author>
  hatu...@cox.net
  (Hatunen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:12:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Biblical Archaeology: Evidence of the Exodus from Egypt</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/cfb4f7e0e75ff37c/7d3bb83009500ce5?show_docid=7d3bb83009500ce5</link>
  <description>
  &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; I thought that the Testimonium Flavianum, the section that now says &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Jesus was The Christ&amp;quot;, is generally acknowledged to be a later &lt;br&gt; Christian embellishment of a genuine mention of Jesus. I have never &lt;br&gt; heard that the other mention of Jesus, in the account of the death &lt;br&gt; of James, is an interpolation. OK, maybe I&#39;ve heard that from some
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/talk.origins/browse_thread/thread/cfb4f7e0e75ff37c/7d3bb83009500ce5?show_docid=7d3bb83009500ce5</guid>
  <author>
  jlastn...@comcast.dot.net
  (John McKendry)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 03:12:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
