Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Fwd: SW4 People
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  7 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Peter Gomes  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 24 May 2006, 00:23
From: "Peter Gomes" <petego...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 00:23:38 +0100
Local: Wed 24 May 2006 00:23
Subject: Fwd: SW4 People


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "SW4 People" by Peter Gomes
Peter Gomes  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 15 Oct 2007, 15:42
From: "Peter Gomes" <petego...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:42:48 +0100
Local: Mon 15 Oct 2007 15:42
Subject: Re: SW4 People
I have just heard an as yet unconfirmed rumour that Labour controlled
Lambeth Council has just reversed its decision and will now demolish
Clapham Manor pool.

So much for a campaign that used the issue to gain political control -
should this rumour turn out to be true.

If anyone has any further information on this please let me know

Pete Gomes


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rahul Patel  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 15 Oct 2007, 23:03
From: Rahul Patel <rahul.pa...@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:03:14 +0100
Local: Mon 15 Oct 2007 23:03
Subject: Re: SW4 People

Dear all,

I did a search of Lambeth website and this document has shown up. I  
don't if the attached document helps but it is Lambeth's Development  
Brief which was approved by its Cabinet on 10th Sept. It is going to  
full council on 17th Nov.

Unless I am mistaken, it is asking developers to come up with the bid  
which could be demolition or refurbishment. but knowing Lambeth's  
instincts it is going to go towards demolition and fit in a tiny pool.

  
Rahul Patel

On Oct 15, 2007, at 15:42, Peter Gomes wrote:

I have just heard an as yet unconfirmed rumour that Labour controlled
Lambeth Council has just reversed its decision and will now demolish
Clapham Manor pool.

So much for a campaign that used the issue to gain political control -
should this rumour turn out to be true.

If anyone has any further information on this please let me know

Pete Gomes

Rahul Patel, rahul.pa...@btinternet.com
+44 7956 579466


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
João Amaral  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 16 Oct 2007, 10:08
From: João Amaral <sr_lo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues 16 Oct 2007 10:08
Subject: Re: SW4 People
Hi,
No doubt about it. The combined area of existing leisure centre and depot is huge has a great potential for luxury housing. I still dont understand why this depot area does not revert to community use with a modernised leisure centre. Surely the sale of M S House would generate a good percentage of the funds required. Also the consultation process was so biased only showing newly built L centres against the current LC always portrayed as "old, dark and grim". There was almost nothing about good modernisation projects to be seen like it couldnt be done.
joao

___________________________________________________________________________ _________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Peter Thoms  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 16 Oct 2007, 16:31
From: Peter Thoms <peter.th...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0100 (BST)
Local: Tues 16 Oct 2007 16:31
Subject: Re: SW4 People
Darren Sanders reports:
Angie and I are going to a council briefing tonight on
the issue. I will be late due to an emergency school
governors meeting, but will keep you posted.

However, at a 'bidder presentation session', the
notion of demolishing the current pool, even if only
to rebuild it on another part of the site, was
certainly floated.

I believed Labour's campaign at the election was
disingenuous to say the least on this as on so many
issues. Sadly, as Gordon Brown has disciovered, you
get found out if you do that.

More as and when.

Darren

--- João Amaral <sr_lo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

___________________________________________________________________________ _________

> Need a vacation? Get great deals
> to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
> http://travel.yahoo.com/

      ___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Peter Thoms  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 16 Oct 2007, 16:31
From: Peter Thoms <peter.th...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0100 (BST)
Local: Tues 16 Oct 2007 16:31
Subject: Re: SW4 People
Darren Sanders reports:
Angie and I are going to a council briefing tonight on
the issue. I will be late due to an emergency school
governors meeting, but will keep you posted.

However, at a 'bidder presentation session', the
notion of demolishing the current pool, even if only
to rebuild it on another part of the site, was
certainly floated.

I believed Labour's campaign at the election was
disingenuous to say the least on this as on so many
issues. Sadly, as Gordon Brown has disciovered, you
get found out if you do that.

More as and when.

Darren

--- João Amaral <sr_lo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

___________________________________________________________________________ _________

> Need a vacation? Get great deals
> to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
> http://travel.yahoo.com/

      ___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
khar...@aol.com  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 17 Oct 2007, 18:13
From: KHar...@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:13:55 EDT
Local: Wed 17 Oct 2007 18:13
Subject: Re: SW4 People
Hi Peter
The issue before the last council election was that a new pool was to be
built on the Mary Seacole House site and that no guarantees could be given that
the new pool would not be significantly smaller and shallower (owing to smaller
area for rebuilding and proximity to tube line). Think there was even doubt
that the site was suitable for a pool at all. There was also the issue of the
depot site in its entirety along with the Old Town library being sold to private
developers.
Before and since the election the Labour council has guaranteed that a small
part of the depot site be sold off, that upgraded swimming and Leisure Centre
facilities remain on the depot site, that Mary Seacole House be used in part
or in its entirety for Council services and that the Old Town library building
not be sold to private developers.
What has changed since then (understand there were various public
consultations and presentations which I'm afraid I didn't bother going to) is that a new
pool is to be built on existing site (rather than a renovation of the existing
pool) and that the library will move to the High Street while the library
building will be used for other community activities.
Seems all OK to me... ?
K

   </HTML>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google