StaticMatic Google Group

Re: Is anybody using partials with locals?

2008-09-06T18:55:37Z

I certainly understand not having enough time to do everything in your
life!

I find staiticmatic to be a well thought out project and I think
you've done a great job.

Thanks

Paris Hilton's Little Fan

2008-09-06T00:41:33Z

We can't have Paris Hilton without her biggest, little fan.
[link]

Re: Is anybody using partials with locals?

2008-09-04T22:55:29Z

Hey,

Staticmatic is most definatly still in development - although progress
has been a little slow from my side due to work/family commitments.
However, I am gearing up for a push to get staticmatic 2 ready for
release so expect that very shortly.

Regarding your current problems, I'll take a look and try and get any

Re: Is anybody using partials with locals?

2008-09-04T19:11:17Z

I did see that thread, but I was hoping progress had been made since
then... Where would I set staticmatic to use haml 1.8.3? I cannot
uninstall haml 2.0.2 as I have other rails & merb projects using that.

Just curious, is staticmatic still an ongoing project? It looks like
there hasn't been a release in a while and the staticmatic 2 page on

Re: Is anybody using partials with locals?

2008-09-04T11:41:26Z

I haven't touched staticmatic stuff in a little while but the last time I
checked, the only stable version combination was staticmatic 0.9.3 and haml
1.8.2.
See this thread:
[link]
-Ryan

Is anybody using partials with locals?

2008-09-04T03:57:39Z

I tried using partials with 0.9.4 with locals and it dies. Looks like
0.9.4 is not compatible with haml 2+. I tried using staticmatic 2 from
git and the preview won't even load, it says there's an error on:

$ rake preview --
trace
(in mysite)
** Invoke preview (first_time)
** Execute preview

Re: On-demand template handlers

2008-08-04T21:27:50Z

This looks great Thomas - I'll take a look over it and get it into
core sometime this week.

Steve

On-demand template handlers

2008-07-31T17:38:56Z

In my branch on github, staticmatic now attempts to load a list of
gems (haml, liquid, redcloth, etc) and enables template handlers for
each if they are found. This makes staticmatic template agnostic as
haml and sass are loaded just the same as Markdown or Liquid. It also
removes all the Haml.init_rails hacks.

Re: HAML error... Any pointers?

2008-07-31T10:50:19Z

Anyway , the following way can sovle the problem at the moment:

install haml gem 2.0.0 (download from rubyforge)

delete haml gem2.0.1 or 2.0.2( sudo gem uninstall haml)

then It will work fine.

Re: HAML error... Any pointers?

2008-07-31T06:10:20Z

No, can't make it working.

1,sudo gem install gem just update haml to 2.0.2 same problem
gem list as :
sudo gem install staticmatic
password：
Updating metadata for 32 gems from [link]
.............................. ..
complete
Successfully installed haml-2.0.2

Re: HAML error... Any pointers?

2008-07-30T16:02:24Z

Hi,

This error normally happens because the version of haml installed is
not supported by the installed StaticMatic. Try doing:

sudo gem install staticmatic

which may fix your problems. You can also try the (as yet not
officially released) new version of StaticMatic over on github:
[link].

Re: HAML error... Any pointers?

2008-07-30T10:36:09Z

btw,

the odd name like ".container" and "span-24" comes from blueprintcss
framwork. I found it extremely cool to write web page if combine with
haml and staticmatic.

Re: HAML error... Any pointers?

2008-07-30T10:33:41Z

yes ,I have this problem also.

try this :if my index.haml is like this:

.container hello

only one line is ok;

if add a line:
.container hello
.span-24 body

then the erro similar will occur
.in `generate_html': undefined method `line_offset' for

if i change it to
.container hello

Re: CSS subfolders

2008-07-23T07:55:32Z

Yep, found that out quite quickly after looking at the "How to use"
page as well
[link]
(Static) CSS files go in site/stylesheets, not src/stylesheets.
Thanks, Ryan!

Re: CSS subfolders

2008-07-22T15:52:05Z

Are the files in /src/stylesheets/blueprint CSS files or SASS files?
If they are SASS files they should tag along, if they don't it's a bug. If
they are CSS files they shouldn't tag along, because that's not how the
current version of StaticMatic works.