Message from discussion new idea

MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.73.17 with SMTP id v17mr210389aga.12.1226028857473; Thu, 06 
	Nov 2008 19:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:34:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ab0891eb-78c4-4e6a-8c9b-5bb74ebbb8b1@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 213.40.128.128
References: <ab0891eb-78c4-4e6a-8c9b-5bb74ebbb8b1@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; 
	rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092414 Firefox/3.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <bb55e3fa-e449-442c-8554-5f51b2209caa@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: new idea
From: mike <craftm...@hotmail.com>
To: Solar Chat Plus <solar-plus@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In theory this could be possible, but the inverter demands a high
ampage and will always use more power consumption than it provides,
that's a fact of life.

The real test would be when the 150w is being used as this is when the
ampage rises in the inverter, the battery would not keep up with the
rate of charge necessary.


On 5 Nov, 20:12, "m...@weathersystemsonline.co.uk"
<m...@weathersystemsonline.co.uk> wrote:
> I was wondering if it was possible to use a inverter connected to a
> battery that feeds power to a battery charger via an controller that
> in turn tops up the battery thereby if my calculations are right, the
> battery never run down and yet get about 150w spare capacity from an
> 300w Inverter =A0(FREE ELECTRICITY)?
>