Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion new idea
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
mike  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov 2008, 03:34
From: mike <craftm...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri 7 Nov 2008 03:34
Subject: Re: new idea
In theory this could be possible, but the inverter demands a high
ampage and will always use more power consumption than it provides,
that's a fact of life.

The real test would be when the 150w is being used as this is when the
ampage rises in the inverter, the battery would not keep up with the
rate of charge necessary.

On 5 Nov, 20:12, "m...@weathersystemsonline.co.uk"

<m...@weathersystemsonline.co.uk> wrote:
> I was wondering if it was possible to use a inverter connected to a
> battery that feeds power to a battery charger via an controller that
> in turn tops up the battery thereby if my calculations are right, the
> battery never run down and yet get about 150w spare capacity from an
> 300w Inverter  (FREE ELECTRICITY)?

> Can this be possible....


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google