<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if</id>
  <title type="text">soc.history.what-if Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Alternate history.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/soc.history.what-if/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="soc.history.what-if feed"/>
  <updated>2009-12-16T17:54:30Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jack Linthicum</name>
  <email>jacklinthi...@earthlink.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T17:54:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/7bd78728bb13c560/64659d2b5ab94004?show_docid=64659d2b5ab94004</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/7bd78728bb13c560/64659d2b5ab94004?show_docid=64659d2b5ab94004"/>
  <title type="text">Re: US Navy of 2009 vs 1990</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Understand ZZ is probably a bot that responds to key words in a &lt;br&gt; posting to give its response. Therefore the adjectives and nouns &lt;br&gt; sometimes are a random fit and sometimes not. I personally think it is &lt;br&gt; some clown with a lot of time on his/her hands and not a whole lot of &lt;br&gt; originality.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Insane Ranter</name>
  <email>log...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T17:21:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/72b4992f8c3fd2d3/603c44be49ba148d?show_docid=603c44be49ba148d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/72b4992f8c3fd2d3/603c44be49ba148d?show_docid=603c44be49ba148d"/>
  <title type="text">What if we knew Many Licks Does It Take to Get to the Center of a Tootsie Pop?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  No more lollipops
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michele</name>
  <email>don&#39;tspammeat...@tln.it</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T16:36:11Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/15a2b5fc0c2bf70a/61cf989f977a9f1a?show_docid=61cf989f977a9f1a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/15a2b5fc0c2bf70a/61cf989f977a9f1a?show_docid=61cf989f977a9f1a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Gliders closer to the bridges in Market Garden - a plus was Twilight Drops in WWII -Was Steerable parachutes in WII</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Invid Fan&amp;quot; &amp;lt;in...@loclanet.com&amp;gt; ha scritto nel messaggio &lt;br&gt; Are you sure about this reason? I seem to remember the point was that they &lt;br&gt; wanted some open flat fields, both for the paradrop _and_ for landing &lt;br&gt; gliders inside a suitable area and a secured perimeter (secured by the &lt;br&gt; paratroopers, of course). Such fields were absurdly far.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Invid Fan</name>
  <email>in...@loclanet.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T16:29:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/15a2b5fc0c2bf70a/bd5bb897746c4bce?show_docid=bd5bb897746c4bce</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/15a2b5fc0c2bf70a/bd5bb897746c4bce?show_docid=bd5bb897746c4bce"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Gliders closer to the bridges in Market Garden - a plus was Twilight Drops in WWII -Was Steerable parachutes in WII</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;4b28b32c$0$641$4fafb...@reade r4.news.tin.it&amp;gt;, Michele &lt;br&gt; The problem was that to limit losses of planes, paratroopers had to be &lt;br&gt; dropped miles from the bridge. If they have to do that and take one end &lt;br&gt; of the bridge anyways, there&#39;s no advantage to then bringing in gliders &lt;br&gt; on top of them. The point of using gliders I&#39;d think would be to have
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John</name>
  <email>pelc...@charter.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T16:26:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/7bd78728bb13c560/1ac63413f4248e9a?show_docid=1ac63413f4248e9a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/7bd78728bb13c560/1ac63413f4248e9a?show_docid=1ac63413f4248e9a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: US Navy of 2009 vs 1990</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Dec 1, 8:30 pm, &amp;quot;zzbun...@netscape.net&amp;quot; &amp;lt;zzbun...@netscape.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Post Rickover Torpedoes&amp;quot;? Please elaborate on what did you have mind &lt;br&gt; when you posted this comment. &lt;br&gt; Thanks and take care all . . . &lt;br&gt; John
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Daniel Titley</name>
  <email>abe...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T15:32:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/cc2016311a1f4d59?show_docid=cc2016311a1f4d59</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/cc2016311a1f4d59?show_docid=cc2016311a1f4d59"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Conception nobody expected.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  There&#39;s plenty of evidence to show that George VI and especally &lt;br&gt; Elizabeth (the Queen Mother) disliked Wallis and resented the &lt;br&gt; abdication. Remember, no member of the Royal family went to Edward&#39;s &lt;br&gt; wedding and Wallis was not given the title Her Royal Highness. &lt;br&gt; Maybe Edward and Wallis having children would have changed things, or
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Daniel Titley</name>
  <email>abe...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T15:13:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/f8a8bdadc1b83076/ee7d5fd7b917b408?show_docid=ee7d5fd7b917b408</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/f8a8bdadc1b83076/ee7d5fd7b917b408?show_docid=ee7d5fd7b917b408"/>
  <title type="text">Edward VIII Assassinated</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On 16 July 1936 an Irish malcontent, Jerome Brannigan, produced a &lt;br&gt; loaded revolver as Edward VIII rode on horseback at Constitution Hill, &lt;br&gt; near Buckingham Palace. Police spotted the gun and he was quickly &lt;br&gt; arrested. &lt;br&gt; There is some debate as to whether this was a genuine assassination &lt;br&gt; attempt or just a stunt. There are also questions about the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Raymond Speer</name>
  <email>rays...@webtv.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T14:05:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/1b765e49342d493e/8da591eb0b3141bc?show_docid=8da591eb0b3141bc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/1b765e49342d493e/8da591eb0b3141bc?show_docid=8da591eb0b3141bc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: President Winfield Scott--Of Mexico</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Santa Anna&#39;s &amp;quot;purported&amp;quot; autobiography was printed in English about 25 &lt;br&gt; years ago. It is by no means a scintillating read. Basically, the author &lt;br&gt; remembers himself to have been a real good fellow, constantly betrayed &lt;br&gt; by everybody else in his life. &lt;br&gt; The single source of the &amp;quot;autobiography&amp;quot; was a man who claimed he was
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Raymond Speer</name>
  <email>rays...@webtv.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T13:51:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/802907f9278631bf?show_docid=802907f9278631bf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/802907f9278631bf?show_docid=802907f9278631bf"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Conception nobody expected.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Allen W. McDonnell forecasts that George VI will be sure to give his &lt;br&gt; niece and nephew through Mrs. Simpson a &amp;quot;raw deal.&amp;quot; Lord almighty, &lt;br&gt; what horrible parents Queen Elzabeth II must have had. &lt;br&gt; Mr. McDonnell&#39;s theory follows the consensus. It would be nice if some &lt;br&gt; magic worked the way into the story and stuff like forgiveness,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Allen W. McDonnell</name>
  <email>tan...@peakoil.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T12:30:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/4bac0190fbd46046?show_docid=4bac0190fbd46046</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/4bac0190fbd46046?show_docid=4bac0190fbd46046"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Conception nobody expected.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well I think most of all it depends on how King George reacts, in his &lt;br&gt; original act making Edward the Duke of Windsor he specified that the title &lt;br&gt; would not pass down to any future descendants of his marriage to Wallis &lt;br&gt; Simpson. On the other hand having such children in evidence might soften &lt;br&gt; his stance and cause him to name them as Royal Duke/Duchess in their own
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Allen W. McDonnell</name>
  <email>tan...@peakoil.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T12:12:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/a8f7fd0ac9fe518e?show_docid=a8f7fd0ac9fe518e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/a8f7fd0ac9fe518e?show_docid=a8f7fd0ac9fe518e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Conception nobody expected.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  He would have to marry her as soon as he found out in order for the child to &lt;br&gt; be legitimate and Heir. He appears to have really been in love with her so &lt;br&gt; I think that is the likely result, and Parliment be danged if they didn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; like it.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jack Linthicum</name>
  <email>jacklinthi...@earthlink.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T12:03:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/1403e601a0f5da08/0274e40b03d0d121?show_docid=0274e40b03d0d121</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/1403e601a0f5da08/0274e40b03d0d121?show_docid=0274e40b03d0d121"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Successful Cotton Gin 1745</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The East India Company imported cotton fabrics into England early in &lt;br&gt; the seventeenth century, and these fabrics sold in spite of the bitter &lt;br&gt; opposition of the wool manufacturers, which at times was strong enough &lt;br&gt; to have the use of cotton cloth prohibited by law. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://inventors.about.com/cs/inventorsalphabet/a/eli_whitney.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michele</name>
  <email>don&#39;tspammeat...@tln.it</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T10:14:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/15a2b5fc0c2bf70a/e3b8e2941b9a2951?show_docid=e3b8e2941b9a2951</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/15a2b5fc0c2bf70a/e3b8e2941b9a2951?show_docid=e3b8e2941b9a2951"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Gliders closer to the bridges in Market Garden - a plus was Twilight Drops in WWII -Was Steerable parachutes in WII</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;pyotr filipivich&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ph...@mindspring.com&amp;gt; ha scritto nel messaggio &lt;br&gt; One thing to consider is that the British _paratroopers_ might establish a &lt;br&gt; fleetingly short control over one of the ends; it would not be contrary to &lt;br&gt; actual history. &lt;br&gt; If they then cut down the lampposts and road signs and traffic lights and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Daniel Titley</name>
  <email>abe...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T09:52:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/24a6396edcde3d6b?show_docid=24a6396edcde3d6b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/ebcdfab714c7a7a4/24a6396edcde3d6b?show_docid=24a6396edcde3d6b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: The Conception nobody expected.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Tim&#39;s right; if they&#39;re conceived after the abdication, they&#39;ll just &lt;br&gt; be minor footnotes with little or no affect on history. &lt;br&gt; Depending what they do with their lives, they could be either tabloid &lt;br&gt; stars or totally obscure. It might be fun to imagine one of them &lt;br&gt; trying to claim the throne; obviously they won&#39;t succeed, but the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>NOMOREWARS_FORISRAEL</name>
  <email>nowars_forisr...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-16T08:56:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/f8c0091d12f18413/0122b5d9e4aa1040?show_docid=0122b5d9e4aa1040</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_frm/thread/f8c0091d12f18413/0122b5d9e4aa1040?show_docid=0122b5d9e4aa1040"/>
  <title type="text">Iraq war was for Israel (not for Iraqi oil!)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Iraq war was for Israel (not for Iraqi oil!) &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://america-hijacked.com/2009/12/15/iraq-war-was-for-israel-not-for-iraqi-oil/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/y8v3mop&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Additional at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://AMERICA-HIJACKED.COM&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
