Message from discussion
latency
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.107.7 with SMTP id f7mr324978anc.2.1222204366131; Tue, 23
Sep 2008 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5b904159-13ef-42c7-8eab-cb8377e6bf59@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 87.194.163.17
References: <5b904159-13ef-42c7-8eab-cb8377e6bf59@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-GB;
rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070206 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <94f5387d-afe1-4326-b8b5-2583eb82c378@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: latency
From: Richard Dallaway <dalla...@gmail.com>
To: Sloppy-discuss <sloppy-discuss@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 23 Sep, 20:37, dantheman <dburkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Simulating slow network connections (i.e. bandwidth) is great - but
> what about latency?
That's a great idea. In fact, I just checked and I see it has already
been suggested:
http://code.google.com/p/sloppy/issues/detail?id=6
Given that it was suggested back in Aug '07, I think I should start
looking around for some help on this project as I don't seem to be
making enough time to keep up with the requests. Apologies for my
delay in getting these features implemented; I'll see if I can find
any willing volunteers to help make Sloppy more useful.
|
