Go to Google Groups Home    sci.physics.relativity
Re: I'm Not Sure if this Worries Me or Not.

Henri Wilson <h...@..>

On 30 Mar 2006 04:09:27 -0800, "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alie...@comcast.net> wrote:

>Henri Wilson wrote:
>> On 29 Mar 2006 00:00:31 -0800, "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alie...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> >Henri Wilson wrote:
>> >> On 27 Mar 2006 23:54:04 -0800, "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alie...@comcast.net> wrote:

>> >> >Oh, yeah, you postulate the existence of some sort of retrograde
>> >> >force operating on charged particles, forget what you call it...

>> >> Are you refering to Wilson's 'reverse field bubble'?

>> >Oh yeah, that's what you call it...
>> >Tell me, Henri, what does an electron pass through that pushes back
>> >and keeps the electron from going any faster than c?

>> There is no theoretical limit to relative speed.

>> In an accelerator that uses an electric field, the moving charge builds up a
>> reverse field around itself. The faster it goes the bigger the reverse field.
>> At speed c wrt the plates, the local reverse field balances the applied field.

>What happens when the electron exits the accelerator? Where does
>the reverse field bubble go? I presume that it must stay with the
>electron, otherwise you have some major conservation of energy
>violations to contend with.

Bolometer experiments show that it remains with the electron, at least for a
short period.
However there is another possibility.
The 'bubble' might only exists while the charge, along with its existing
bubble, is being accelerated between the electrodes.
When the change leaves the plates, the bubble might dissipate in time. If that
is true then the bubble energy would go into further accelerating the charge to
a much higher speed and KE.

Get it?

>So, freely moving electrons, even -outside- of an accelerator, must
>be surrounded by reverse field bubbles.

It would be interesting to relate my theory to electrons that are accelerated
with varying magnetic fields.
I guess there would be an equivalent 'reverse magnetic bubble'.

>> >Aether? Are you an aetherist? Sure sounds like it to me...

>> Don 't even suggest it.
>> I am a true relativist.

>Nope.

The BaTh is also a true relativistic theory.

>Jerry

HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm