sci.physics.relativity Google Group

Re: What's your guys' take on Moving Dimensions Theory? Vs. String Theory / LQG?

cjcount...@yahoo.com (cjcountess) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:54:48 UT

Dre,
I like your opening argument to get our attention and have your case
heard. But I see it a bit differently than you.
To start, single photons do not expand at c, allegedly, “according to
quantum theory”, or surf the 4th dimension timelessly, allegedly,
“according to relativity”.
While I can see and agree with the idea of a quantity of photons

Re: FR Bending of Light

p...@fornux.com (Phil Bouchard) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:52:05 UT

PD wrote:
[...]
Yup.
Alright, let's get it on. Gravitational time dilation and light bending.

Re: FR Bending of Light

macromi...@yahoo.com (BURT) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:45:42 UT

I challenge anyone to answer this question for sure: what wave is the
photon in the electric or the magnetic?
I am in the aether waiting for the answer.
Mitch Raemsch

Re: Special Relativity and the Conservation of Energy

headmas...@hogwarts.physics_q (Androcles) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:41:49 UT

So what?
SR is nothing more than a lunatic's assumption anyway, based on
a ridiculous assertion:
[link]
Let us
Where do you get that absurd idea from?
Bullshit. You imagine increases, you tell us where it comes from.
No it would not.
An idle one at that.

Re: FR Bending of Light

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:35:09 UT

That's amusing, but he never did that. Didn't have to.
Ah, so there is a vast, hidden mound of counterevidence that you are
sure is there but of course can't cite because it's been hidden.
Yup.

Re: Is physics a science?

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:31:35 UT

Let me know when you're ready to publish your extensions of Maxwell's
theory that uses his original form of Guass' law, quantizes the
vortices, characterizes liquid electrons, and makes testably unique
predictions of measurable phenomena.

Re: FR Bending of Light

p...@fornux.com (Phil Bouchard) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:30:21 UT

PD wrote:
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts!" -- Albert Einstein
And only the successful ones were revealed.
Wanna bet?

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:28:27 UT

At least "steady state cosmology" is isotropic. You may want to look
it up and find out why we know steady state cosmology is wrong.

Re: The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:27:28 UT

The stream is not isotropic at any point in that picture.

Re: FR Bending of Light

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:26:04 UT

What's better than exact?
That's part of the input data. It comes from a measurement of dark
energy.
Says nature.
Wormholes aren't faster-than-light tunneling.

Re: FR Bending of Light

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:24:31 UT

Facts don't "like" theories.
It's been tested multiple times over the last 90 years.
So can GR.

Re: Special Relativity and the Conservation of Energy

ybm...@nooos.fr.invalid (YBM) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:21:31 UT

Anamitra Palit a écrit :
There is no extra energy. Even from the point of view of the
place were the pair appeared, there were no extra energy, just
a change from kinetic and/or light frequency energy to mass.
(BTW, there is not, by itself, 'electromagnetic' energy).
Same from the point of view of any other, moving or not, observer.

Re: $10,000 at 20:1

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:17:09 UT

OK to here.
No.
But it doesn't say that.
Yes, but not for the reason you said.
Yes.
No.
No.

Re: Does Light Travel ?

thedraperfam...@gmail.com (PD) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:13:55 UT

Explain what? Relativity doesn't say that. Photons travel from one
place to another.

Special Relativity and the Conservation of Energy

palit.anami...@gmail.com (Anamitra Palit) — Tue, 11 Nov 2009 23:54:33 UT

Special Relativity does not allow infinitely fast signals. Let us
consider the creaction of charged particles(particle -antiparticle
pair) in the light of this fact.On creation of the particles
information of the creation spreads of at a maximun speed of 'c' that
is the speed of light. After time t only a sphere of radius ct has the