On Nov 8, 4:25 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It didn't move. Strength of gravity and curvature are in aether.
> Einstein equated his curved gravity to the aether. I say it is a space- > time aether or the gravity continuum where everything is moving.
> Mitch Raemsch
Mitch, simply because everyone else ignores your posts, I am responding since it's a slow day here.
Realize that Einstein never proposed "curved gravity", nor is it a part of any of his PUBLISHED theories. Granted that he may have considered the possibility, just as all of us speculate. It didn't work for him, so he never published it. Dhuh!
I live to speculate too, but nobody takes my speculation seriously. It's simply not interesting to others like fiction writers and all of their ilk. I once speculated on life after death, then concluded that their isn't any. No heaven, no Hell. What remains after our death is the memories that others hold of us, since we are now little more than worm food after death. If you are familiar with the term 'inert', once we die and as the body chills, we become inert, and all of our thoughts, ideas, and memories become inert too. So much for life after death.
Gravity renders more interesting speculation, and it is quite real. The Newtonian concept of gravity suggest acceleration, which in the case of gravity on earty is 32 feet per second, per second. Perhaps gravity is simply the evidence of the universe constantly expanding.
Speculation of course, but speculation that is more credible than the crap that you post!
> On Nov 8, 4:25 pm, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > It didn't move. Strength of gravity and curvature are in aether.
> > Einstein equated his curved gravity to the aether. I say it is a space- > > time aether or the gravity continuum where everything is moving.
> > Mitch Raemsch
> Mitch, simply because everyone else ignores your posts, I am > responding since it's a slow day here.
> Realize that Einstein never proposed "curved gravity", nor is it a > part of any of his PUBLISHED theories. Granted that he may have > considered the possibility, just as all of us speculate. It didn't > work for him, so he never published it. Dhuh!
> I live to speculate too, but nobody takes my speculation seriously. > It's simply not interesting to others like fiction writers and all of > their ilk. I once speculated on life after death, then concluded that > their isn't any. No heaven, no Hell. What remains after our death is > the memories that others hold of us, since we are now little more than > worm food after death. If you are familiar with the term 'inert', once > we die and as the body chills, we become inert, and all of our > thoughts, ideas, and memories become inert too. So much for life > after death.
> Gravity renders more interesting speculation, and it is quite real. > The Newtonian concept of gravity suggest acceleration, which in the > case of gravity on earty is 32 feet per second, per second. Perhaps > gravity is simply the evidence of the universe constantly expanding.
> Speculation of course, but speculation that is more credible than the > crap that you post!
> Harry C.
> .
He didn't use the terms gravity continuum but that is what his theory was. Why quible over words? Also he likened it to the aether in his Leiden lectures.
> It didn't move. Strength of gravity and curvature are in aether.
> Einstein equated his curved gravity to the aether. I say it is a space- > time aether or the gravity continuum where everything is moving.
> Mitch Raemsch
Mitch, simply because everyone else ignores your posts, I am responding since it's a slow day here.
============================================ Conover, tell us again about the "equitorial" (equatorial) orbit of the shuttle that takes it over Buffalo NY. Simply because everyone else ignores your fuckwittery, I am responding since it's a slow day here and I need a good laugh.
> > It didn't move. Strength of gravity and curvature are in aether.
> > Einstein equated his curved gravity to the aether. I say it is a space- > > time aether or the gravity continuum where everything is moving.
> > Mitch Raemsch
> Mitch, simply because everyone else ignores your posts, I am > responding since it's a slow day here.
> ============================================ > Conover, tell us again about the "equitorial" (equatorial) orbit > of the shuttle that takes it over Buffalo NY. Simply because everyone > else ignores your fuckwittery, I am responding since it's a slow day > here and I need a good laugh.
> Has anyone ever used factor analysis (principal coordinates, > eigencovariance) to try to locate underlying hidden coordinate > systems of space-time?
No.
--Androcles. [Phooey on Einstein: Spacetime for subprime Cretins]
|
