Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Google Mail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion [ATimes] Letter
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
G V  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 25 Apr 2008, 10:18
From: G V <geeveem...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:18:07 +0000 (GMT)
Local: Fri 25 Apr 2008 10:18
Subject: Re: [sangkancil] Re: [ATimes] Letter

Wah gnh, now THAT IS far-fetched for this day and age, though China is no stranger to being a thorough-going Imperialist, as Tibet and Xinjiang still show today. Even you Cantonese and Fukienese are the result of the non-Han indigines of those two regions being enlightened (gobbled up?) over the centuries by armies of the Han emperors, who originated from the Yellow River basin thousands of kilometres away.

(And why should China send 500 million when the several millions that did come to SE Asia seem to be  doing quite a creditable job anyway? he he . . . .)

But really, China's main hope lies in relative stability at home and in the Euros and $$$ from the West and Japan, along with as much of the techno stuff that it can inveigle out of them, wouldn't you say, hey gnh??? Not in sending 500 million south when they're more needed to man the toxic toy and mobile phone factories, which they can still sell to the few countries left trading with them (if their adolescents of all ages continue with their anti-West childishness)???

Just leave SE Asia for the "tongbao" that have already settled there, gnh???

Don't you get the impression sometimes, gnh, that for the mainlanders (and no doubt for some of the overseas Chinese) the notion of "China" somehow occupies the same position that the Qur'an holds for Muslims? It is the highest, noblest, most precious and sacred thing and you'd better not fool with it?? I think we've seen plenty of evidence for that over the last couple of weeks (as if we needed more), hey gnh?

----- Original Message ----

From: "g...@pc.jaring.my" <g...@pc.jaring.my>
To: sangkancil@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, 25 April, 2008 4:44:48 PM
Subject: [sangkancil] Re: [ATimes] Letter

G V

Now how can that be ?  China won't die, if it doesn't want to die ...

500 mil Chinakuis will go  on the LONG MARCH down to Singapore.....
//////steamroll Myanmar, Laos, Thailand, VIetnam, Cambodia, Malaysia ( ouch )
and then Singapore .....

This occupation will not be like the timid American occupation of Iraq etc, but will be accompanied
by civilian settlements as in Gaza and West Bank, Palestine.

 Even Malaysia, Thailand, VIetnam has their cancerous Chinakui which are waiting for the Great  RED Tide .... MOTHER OF ALL TSUNAMIs

God will save Indonesia ( because of the Sea, as in the case of UK and Germans )

GV God really bless you ----- in these times of RICE SHORTAGES< Sarawak going to be
RICE BOWL of THE NEW WORLD

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:15 PM, G V wrote:

Wah gnh, and if no one sells to China, China die also maaaa.

And it is just things like that that probably led the Chinese govt to clamp down on the silly nongs "spontaneously" (ahem) parking their trucks and skinny backsides in front of Carrefour up and down the country.

How do you think a Western ban on trade, investment, visas for foreign travel and study and cultural exchanges would go down with the "laobaixing", hey gnh???

----- Original Message ----
From: gnh <g...@pc.jaring.my>
To: sangkancil@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 24 April, 2008 8:29:57 PM
Subject: [sangkancil] Re: [ATimes] Letter

Hey G V

Now Malaysia also part of China, yes ?

Because if China no buy, Malaysia die ........

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

G V wrote:
花 崗齋文集 Collected Writings from the Granite Studio
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Chinese historian: "To exaggerate the size of China's historical territory is not patriotic" - Full Text

      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google