Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Sangkancil
Home
Pages
Files
About this group
Apply for group membership
Message from discussion [ATimes] Letter
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
G V  
View profile
  More options 25 Apr 2008, 09:15
From: G V <geeveem...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:15:13 +0000 (GMT)
Local: Fri 25 Apr 2008 09:15
Subject: Re: [sangkancil] Re: [ATimes] Letter
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Wah gnh, and if no one sells to China, China die also maaaa.

And it is just things like that that probably led the Chinese govt to clamp down on the silly nongs "spontaneously" (ahem) parking their trucks and skinny backsides in front of Carrefour up and down the country.

How do you think a Western ban on trade, investment, visas for foreign travel and study and cultural exchanges would go down with the "laobaixing", hey gnh???

----- Original Message ----
From: gnh <g...@pc.jaring.my>
To: sangkancil@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 24 April, 2008 8:29:57 PM
Subject: [sangkancil] Re: [ATimes] Letter

Hey G V

Now Malaysia also part of China, yes ?

Because if China no buy, Malaysia die ........

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

G V wrote:
花
崗齋文集 Collected Writings from the Granite Studio
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
Chinese historian: "To exaggerate the size of China's
historical territory is not patriotic" - Full Text
Via CDT:
The blog Letters from China has a post about an article in the magazine China Review by Fudan
University professor Ge Jianxiong. The CDT brief and the Letters from China
post both feature the title "Tibet not always a part of China: Chinese
Historian." Taken in context, Professor Ge's comments are not quite so
shocking. While he does mention Tibet as not being a part of the Tang
Empire, the article itself I think is more interesting for the larger
argument: When discussing what is and, perhaps more importantly, what
is not China, it's important to

      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google