I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:
1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire. I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.
2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems in dealing with cross winds. Also, their small mass means that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier motorcycle is.
3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders. It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow. I think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.
These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head. I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:
>1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire. I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.
>2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems in dealing with cross winds. Also, their small mass means that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier motorcycle is.
>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
>4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders. It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow. I think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.
>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head. I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.
Scooters also are too underpowered... they don't have enough power to: a) get out of trouble behind them, like a speeding cager b) go with the flow of traffic, making them dangerous to others as well as themselves. As a motorcyclist, I'd rather get a speedin ticket than go slower than the flow of traffic (I've had to prove this on the Bay Bridge... oh well)
=======================Sea-Bass=====================Sears================== ==== o 1979 Yamaha XS750|Perception O Mirage | | 1985 Toyota _/\_> Just ride!| o| ||~~~~~~\___ 4Runner O,> /O e-mail: scs8@ | ~^~^ (====<\|====) ^~^ ||_--____--_) Just about cunixb.cc.columbia.edu |Just ~^~^~^~ | ~^~^ kayak!| () () anything else! Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after you -- Nirvana =========================================================================== ====
ok, the imperium strikes back - let's defend our VESPA ;-)
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Feb 1992 23:50:23 GMT, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) said:
>> 1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire. I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.
Where in the hell are you riding your motorcycle? I am living on the country side with some very old and rough roads and got no problems yet. Such potholes are dangerous for both motorcycles and scooters!
You should ride some scooters before you talk about upright stability. I admit there are plenty of scooters where you have a "bad feeling", but there are also other ones (mine ;-), depends on construction.
>> 2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems in dealing with cross winds. Also, their small mass means that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier motorcycle is.
On the other hand the area they show against the wind from the side is smaller. I remember more problems with my little 50ccm motorcycle.
>> 3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
can't imagine rapid deceleration with these VESPA brakes :-) are you nailed on your foot pegs? ;-)
>> 4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders. It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow. I think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.
My scooter has no clutch ??? are you sure ??? Once I rode 100 km with a broken clutch handle; I tell you it was like rodeo ...
If you read this newsgroup for some time, you see beginners ask about 750cc bikes, how about that ? By the way there are less accidents with scooters than with motorcycles. The speed isn't high and you won't pass as often as with a motorcycle.
>> These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head. I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.
There you are. If you need a list of positive aspects, let me know. Note that I like motorcycles too, little brothers have XS400 and XV800.
Howdy, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
> 3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his >body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his >feet, as with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances >of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
This usually won't be a problem as scooters have those snazzy drum brakes that can't stop you quickly anyway :-)
Mark
| Mark J. Andy WERA NV #813 DoD #813 | | ma...@andrew.cmu.edu AMA/CCS AM #811 AMA #700560 | | Co-founder/Rider, Team RISC and Two Geeks Racing | | '82 Seca 650 (street), '85 RZ350 (track), '78 KM100 (commute-in-snow) | | I want RZ350 parts like steering damper, fork brace, exhaust, etc... |
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:17:11 GMT, s...@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Sebastian C Sears) said:
>> Scooters also are too underpowered... they don't have enough power to: >> a) get out of trouble behind them, like a speeding cager >> b) go with the flow of traffic, making them dangerous to others as well >> as themselves. As a motorcyclist, I'd rather get a speedin >> ticket than go slower than the flow of traffic (I've had to >> prove this on the Bay Bridge... oh well)
7 kW 2-stroke is good power for 110 kg vehicle. A normal cage has no chance up to 70 km/h if I want to (I often want to ;-). In higher regions the acceleration is bad, admitted, so you must take care when passing at these speeds. The scooter runs 100 km/h without problems, so if I don't use the Autobahn I'm really within flow of traffic ... On long rides I prefer the motorcycle too, but only because of time and acoustics ;-)
HELL, YES! A person could die of embarassment just being seen NEAR one. (Aren't pocket protectors standard scooter accessories?) =========================================================================== ==== "No hour of life is lost that is spent in the saddle." - Winston Churchill The Nashville Flash - d...@vuse.vanderbilt.edu - DoD # 412
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:
>--- >John Stichnoth
Da bears do not allow their player's to ride scooters at spring training in platteville after numerous accidents(Mcmahon and several others got boo boo's). They may ride their Harley's.
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) says:
>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University >of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief >that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the >road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:
Bully for you - Why not debate why more people are killed on bicycles than scooters? or handguns, or smoking, or domestic violence? Or trying to pass Lance (the Jerk) Holst on the track.. (:-)
>1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into >potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire. >I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would >offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.
True, they do.. Cars also have smaller diameter wheels than motorcycles, take the Austin Mini f'rinstance, they have really small wheels... If you ride on roads that have potholes big enough to wrench the wheels right of your scoot, you shouldn't really be riding on it.
>2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems >in dealing with cross winds. Also, their small mass means that they are >more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier >motorcycle is.
True, but try driving a van or perhaps an 18-wheeler in crosswinds.. this affects everyone. Pound for pound I don't think the difference in mass between a scooter and motorcycle is gonna make all that much difference. Avoid bumps!
>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body >from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as >with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over >the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
This is crap, unadulterated. Scooters have floorboards... I've never seen motorcycles with toe clips ala racing bicycles.. so how are your legs going to fly forward during rapid deceleration?
The only thing a motorcycle has over a scooter in this dept is the gas tank.. you can use your {gender specific genital words} to slam in the tank and stop you endo-ing as you decend from warp speed to impulse power. (:-)
>4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders. >It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for >beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow. I >think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits >or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.
What about the inexperience of almost anyone that drives a /mc/car/truck boat/etc etc Being on a scooter does not neccessarily mean you have no experience! The vehicle does not the driver make.
>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head. I am an >experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only >ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and all >comments or additions to this list.
So basically you're not in the position to give an informed opinion then.
Why don't you ride a scooter for a while? see what they can and cannot do and base your speech on fact not "notions".
I didn't really intend to flame you with this, but I am in a position to give a little more informed opinion of scooters and their ilk.
My 2 first 2-wheeled powered vehicles were scooters!, when I was 8 years old my grandfather located a non working Vespa 90 for me to tinker with. It had the carb missing and some cables broken, but I snarfed an old AMAL carb from something and some new cables and it ran well. I had lots of fun with it and rode the piss out of it. Mostly in the dirt and up hills.. I eventually sold it for 13 U.K. pounds when I moved.
The next one was a Vespa 125.. this thing had 1 more gear than the 90 and a bucket full more balls. This scooter could pop and hold wheelies, go 70 mph flat out, Pull my sister behind on a piece of roofing sheet metal (corrugated iron) with no problem.
I have since only owned motorcycles... I guess I grew out of scooters, but that doesn't mean they aren't worth a shit.
I hope your public speaking prof doesn't grade on factual information otherwise your up shit creek.
jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the >University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my >personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ <-- and only your belief...
>vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe
^^^^^^^^^^^ <-- indeed!!!
>this is true:
This is one of the scariest things I've seen on this group in a while: A serious, dedicated motorcyclist preparing to publicly announce how dangerous certain two-wheeled motor vehicles are. John, do you _really_ think this will help motorcyclists? Most of the statements you make are not based on any factual knowledge _or_ on any personal experience (you admit to being a non-scooter rider).
John states:
>1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels ...
So what? Sure they may be somewhat more affected by bumps, but that doesn't make scooters dangerous in all situations. Do you suggest that the government institute minimum wheel size requirements?
>2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems...
Sure, but it can also help in many ways. Suppose your speech said how dangerous motorcycles were because of their light weight campared to cars?
>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body >from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as >with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over >the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
This is ridiculous. I suppose sportbike riders with rear mounted footpegs are always going over the bars due to the fact they can't stop their forward motion with their feet.
>4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders...
"My final reason why motorcycles are dangerous and should be banned is that so many motorcycle riders are so inexperienced..." Experience of riders has *** nothing *** to do with the safety of the vehicle.
>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.
Right again.
>I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have >only ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ obviously. Let me guess -- you didn't like it.
>all comments or additions to this list. >--- >John Stichnoth
I've got one big comment: give it up! The people who hear this speech aren't going to go out thinking "Gee, motorcycles are so much safer than scooters." They're going to think -- "Gee, those scooters are really dangerous. I think that motorized two-wheel vehicles are just a bad idea!"
Why not spend your time and effort instead on giving a speech on the _positive_ aspects of a form of motorcycling that _you_ enjoy, instead of trying to put down someone else's preferred form a transportation? Don't forget, today's scooter riders may be tomorrow's "real" motorcyclists.
-- Alex Ridgway DoD #48 --- *** --- I don't ride a scooter, either.
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
(John W. Stichnoth) writes: >I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of
Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:
>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head. I am an
experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.
This is not mindless flaming, but right there in these last sentences I see enough to react:
You say it yourself: You are talking about things you pulled out of your head, you have not experienced any of them. You have only ridden a scooter on a few occasions.
It looks to me like you are talking about something you don't know !! And this is exactly the same kind of behaviour most of the motorcycle riders have to fight. This is exactly what creates problems and trouble. People thinking they have the ultimate knowledge while they don't know shit ! (sorry, excuse my uh ... not my French, my English (-:).
You are acting exactly like a law maker, an old man that only rides limos with chauffeur any more, and that says: "One day, I was smoking a cigar in the back of my Cadillac when as I was looking outside I saw a motorcycle pass us at what seemed a very high speed... Probably 80 mph ! I thought 'this is dangerous'. That's why I am now campaining to [limit power of the bikes/limit their speed/ban them on some freeways/etc ...] (pick up your own non-sense here).".
And so, as a motorcyclist you are going to say: "This guy dosen't know what he is talking about". The same way some scooter guy might say the same thing listening to you.
I am not a scooter rider, and so far the only problem you expose that I know to be true because I've seen it is the last one. You can ride a scooter with no or very little education of the rules of the street, it's like being a bicycle rider, except you go much faster. A fair number of scooter riders have just never learned how to ride and are dangerous for that, not for the fact they ride a scooter, it would be the same thing on a moped.
I could argue quite strongly all your other points, but it is not my goal here.
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
(in very long lines)
>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
What do foot pegs have to do with not moving forward? Or do you ride with highway pegs only???? :')
-- Jonathan E. Quist INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation j...@i88.isc.com Naperville, IL '71 CL450-K4 "Gleep" DoD #094 "I'm not mad; just terribly, terribly hurt." HDM #007
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the >University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my >personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of >two-wheeled vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as >to why I believe this is true:
Oh, dear, flamebait. You present an incorrect unsupported premise, and procede to bring forth the assumptions on which this premise is based. Readers will notice that most of these assumptions include vague terms like "I would also think that..." and can therefore be accepted as fact.
>1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down >into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch >motorcycles tire. I'm no physics major, but I would also think that >the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby >result in less upright stability.
Never ridden one, have you?
>2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause >problems in dealing with cross winds. Also, their small mass means >that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, >than a heavier motorcycle is.
Actually if you believe your assumption (4) that accounts for sudden and unexpected changes of direction by itself: "Never ascribe to external factors that which can be explained by operator head space error."
>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his >body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his >feet, as with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances >of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
Let's ask John Sloan about this one, shall we? Hey, John, how many times have you gone over the handlebars on your FLHS? How *do* you stay on the bike when you use those triple disc brakes? Or have you replaced the footboards with pegs?
>4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter >riders. It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no >clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be >starting out slow. I think that inexperienced scooter riders often >don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an >accident occurs.
Yup. Just like all those wrecked Goof2's and FZR600R's. The inexperienced foolish rider will get it every time, no matter what they're on. It doesn't take squids long to "learn to ride" ZX-11's either -- just show them which control is which and they're on their way.
Anyway, what's this junk about "no clutch?" Any scooter worthy of the name has a 3- or 4-speed transmission with a real clutch.
>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.
I can tell. Does your brain work without carriage returns as well?
Further comments: You are so off base on this that you forgot to mention that they are underpowered. Of course, real scooters have motors somewhere in the range 350-750cc, so we'll throw that out too.
I think I would assume that your task is to present an untenable argument, which will win you much kudos in the debating team. Or perhaps you intend to become a politician, and are practicing your reasons for banning motorcycles when you are elected?
Let me see if I can come up with some more assumptions to support your case:
5) Riding scooters is cool. All the innocent daughters of local citizens will ride on them and die.
6) Riding scooters is cool. All the innocent daughters of local citizens will go out with scooter riders, take drugs, and become pregnant.
7) All scooters are red, and everyone knows that red is the colour of the devil.
8) The fuel tank of a scooter contains gasoline, which will explode if the scooter falls over.
9) Scooters have handlebars, and beginners are more used to car steering wheels and will therefore turn them the wrong way in corners.
10) Scooters are temptingly cheap, and will cause the nation's youth to get credit cards and become bankrupt.
11) Scooters are temptingly cheap, and will cause the nation's youth to sell drugs to support their scooter habit. Many scooters have a secret luggage compartment under the seat just for this reason!
12) Scooters are so manoeuverable that they are used by organised crime as courier vehicles. Anyone riding a scooter will be forced to join the mafia.
13) Scooters are the chosen transport of Hells Angels, now that they are too recognisable on bikes.
14) The Klu Klux Klan uses scooters so that their robes don't catch in the wheels.
15) Since robes don't catch in the wheels, scooters encourage monks and nuns to ride around and get involved in sinful activities.
16) Some scooters have the ancient words "VESPA", "MIACO" (sp?), and "LAMBRETTA" on them, which we all know are the names of demons who engineered St. Christopher's martyrdom.
I hope you will add these points to your speech to support your personal belief. I think the Public Speaking class will enjoy them.
(Note to readers: I'd add a :-) but I'm afraid this person thinks that it is just fine to invent assumptions to support personal belief.)
Next week: Mr. Stichnoth will present his assumptions to assert his personal belief that helmet law opponents are space aliens who are holding Elvis prisoner. :-)
-- Martyn -------------sas...@unx.sas.com----(Martyn J. Wheeler)----DoD #293------------ SAS Institute, Inc: (919) 677-8000 ext.7954 H: (919) 839-0092 (Raleigh, NC) "If you spin, you deserve to die" -- Mike Hawthorn "I love competition, but I hate conflict" -- Alain Prost
In article <92051.103856RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> Robert Chambers <RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
|In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu |(John W. Stichnoth) says: |> |>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University |>of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief |>that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the |>road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true: | |>1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into |>potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire. |>I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would |>offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability. | |True, they do.. Cars also have smaller diameter wheels than motorcycles, |take the Austin Mini f'rinstance, they have really small wheels... |If you ride on roads that have potholes big enough to wrench the |wheels right of your scoot, you shouldn't really be riding on it.
Curbs. Hit a curb on a bicycle and you will likely go up and over the curb. A motorcycle will also go up and over, possibly scraping something. A car will trash the suspension, but not you. Hit a curb on a scooter and you are toast. I know this from experience.
|>2. Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems |>in dealing with cross winds. Also, their small mass means that they are |>more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier |>motorcycle is. | |True, but try driving a van or perhaps an 18-wheeler in crosswinds.. |this affects everyone. Pound for pound I don't think the difference |in mass between a scooter and motorcycle is gonna make all that much |difference. Avoid bumps!
Yup. And bumps are everywhere. But I do agree that wind is no worse than on a mc, except that the steering geometry is often poor, and that affects handling in general, including wind handling.
|>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body |>from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as |>with a motorcycle). I think this would increase the chances of going over |>the handlebars during rapid deceleration. | |This is crap, unadulterated. Scooters have floorboards... I've never |seen motorcycles with toe clips ala racing bicycles.. so how are your |legs going to fly forward during rapid deceleration?
Your whole lower body flies forward on a scooter. Floorboards don't do shit. Why do you think that you often see people riding around with their feet on the downtubes?
I think he was referring to a cruiser styled motorcycle, with forward pegs. You can stand on those.
|The only thing a motorcycle has over a scooter in this dept is the |gas tank.. you can use your {gender specific genital words} to slam |in the tank and stop you endo-ing as you decend from warp speed to |impulse power. (:-)
Crap. You are SUPPOSED to squeeze the tank with your knees. That you cannot do on a step-through.
|>4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders. |>It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for |>beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow. I |>think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits |>or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs. | |What about the inexperience of almost anyone that drives a /mc/car/truck |boat/etc etc Being on a scooter does not neccessarily mean you have |no experience! The vehicle does not the driver make.
Inexperience of car drivers? Most car drivers have been driving for upwards of ten years. Most scooter drivers are teenagers without even more than a drivers permit, and lots of bicycle experience, which they thinks prepares them for riding a scooter in traffic. They are quite mistaken.
|>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head. I am an |>experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only |>ridden one on a few occaisions. I would greatly appreciate any and all |>comments or additions to this list. | |So basically you're not in the position to give an informed opinion then. | |Why don't you ride a scooter for a while? see what they can and cannot |do and base your speech on fact not "notions".
Okay, facts: 1. Scooters are unstable at speed, due to frame geometry. 2. Scooters lack useable power. Most can't out accelerate a car. 3. Scooter brakes are terrible.
Those are just the physical problems. The problem of rider experience is also serious. Most of us would agree that safe motorcycle riding takes greater traffic skills than safe auto driving. Yet, the regulations over scooters are MUCH more lax than either autos or motos, which is why they are so attractive to inexperienced, uneducated riders. I mean, how many scooter riders you see out there know about counter-steering?
|I didn't really intend to flame you with this, but I am in a position |to give a little more informed opinion of scooters and their ilk. | |My 2 first 2-wheeled powered vehicles were scooters!, when I was |8 years old my grandfather located a non working Vespa 90 for me |to tinker with. It had the carb missing and some cables broken, but |I snarfed an old AMAL carb from something and some new cables and |it ran well. I had lots of fun with it and rode the piss out of it. |Mostly in the dirt and up hills.. I eventually sold it for 13 U.K. |pounds when I moved.
8 years old. And you say scooter riders have experience? See, yours is a perfect example. Do you really think you were a safe rider, with that level of experience? Safe enough to be on the streets where you see scooters now?
|The next one was a Vespa 125.. this thing had 1 more gear than the |90 and a bucket full more balls. This scooter could pop and hold |wheelies, go 70 mph flat out, Pull my sister behind on a piece of |roofing sheet metal (corrugated iron) with no problem.
And how old were you then? Don't you really think that a kid popping wheelies on a shimmying frame is a tad bit unsafe?
I have a similar story, until I took a fall and realized that these things have real problems. I mean, I could stop better on my bicycle!
|I have since only owned motorcycles... I guess I grew out of scooters, |but that doesn't mean they aren't worth a shit.
Perhaps it doesn't mean that, but they still aren't worth shit.
Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions. I have never ridden a Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden Honda step-throughs). Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking (but I doubt it).
|Regards
Yeah, right.
Dave Svoboda (ru...@gagme.chi.il.us) | An Angel on a Harley pulls 90 Concours (Mmmmmmmmmmmm) | across to greet a fellow 81 KZ550 Rat (The Little Engine That Could) | Rolling Stone. AMA ...let me get it out..oh yes... 583905 | He says, "Where ya been, DoD #0330 "Too late for a quote" | where ya 'goin?" -- R Waters
Actually, I'd like to see scooters outlawed for a completely different reason...
They make our people look like absolute fools.
:-):-) ^^^^^^^^^^ Note smiley indicating that I'm making a tounge-in-check joke here. Feel free to flame me if it wasn't very funny/whatever, but NOT because we really shouldn't outlaw scooters. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Please read the above before you flame... oh, the hell with it. You guys are gonna flame the shit outta me anyway, so I might just as well accept it and stick to my guns. ALL SCOOTERS SUCK!!! PEOPLE WHO RIDE THEM (except for the racer types in Motorcyclist a while back) DESERVE TO BE SLOWLY ROASTED OVER A BEEMER JUG!!!!
MWUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
;^}
Mark
| Mark J. Andy WERA NV #813 DoD #813 | | ma...@andrew.cmu.edu AMA/CCS AM #811 AMA #700560 | | Co-founder/Rider, Team RISC and Two Geeks Racing | | '82 Seca 650 (street), '85 RZ350 (track), '78 KM100 (commute-in-snow) | | I want RZ350 parts like steering damper, fork brace, exhaust, etc... |
>>>>> On 21 Feb 92 05:13:35 GMT, svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) said:
> Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions. I have never ridden a > Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden > Honda step-throughs). Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking > (but I doubt it).
Congrats, you've recognized your problem. You've never ridden a Vespa ...
In europe at least you can't say 'scooter' without saying Vespa. And the construction features have a touch of genius (except the brakes ;-)
It's not by chance that mainly Vespa riders defend the image of scooters.
In article <1992Feb21.051335.7...@rtsg.mot.com>, svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) says:
>In article <92051.103856RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> Robert Chambers ><RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes: >|In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>,
jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu |(John W. Stichnoth) says: |>
>Curbs. Hit a curb on a bicycle and you will likely go up and over the >curb. A motorcycle will also go up and over, possibly scraping something. >A car will trash the suspension, but not you. Hit a curb on a scooter and >you are toast. I know this from experience.
I had hit objects like tire ruts, small logs, etc while riding the scooter. If you aren't holding onto the handlebars tightly, they might be snapped out of your hands.. but that goes for motorcycles too.
|difference. Avoid bumps!
>Yup. And bumps are everywhere. But I do agree that wind is no worse >than on a mc, except that the steering geometry is often poor, and that >affects handling in general, including wind handling.
|>3. Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body
>Your whole lower body flies forward on a scooter. Floorboards don't do >shit. Why do you think that you often see people riding around with >their feet on the downtubes?
I don't know which well your and mr. Stichnoth are pulling your data from, but unless you are riding "limp" on the saddle when you stop you aren't going to "fly forward" My scooters had a foot brake for the rear wheel, and while applying that, NOTHING flew forward.
>I think he was referring to a cruiser styled motorcycle, with forward >pegs. You can stand on those.
Whatever... it makes no difference. If you aren't riding like a wet bar rag your legs won't neccessarily give way.
|The only thing a motorcycle has over a scooter in this dept is the |gas tank.. you can use your {gender specific genital words} to slam |in the tank and stop you endo-ing as you decend from warp speed to |impulse power. (:-)
Crap. You are SUPPOSED to squeeze the tank with your knees. That you cannot do on a step-through.
Oooohhh A FACT!!! A FACT!!
|>4. My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.
>Inexperience of car drivers? Most car drivers have been driving for upwards >of ten years. Most scooter drivers are teenagers without even more than a >drivers permit, and lots of bicycle experience, which they thinks prepares >them for riding a scooter in traffic. They are quite mistaken.
Dave, this is flamebait. Length of time driving a car on roads does not neccessarily give an indication of driving prowess! There are old blue haired ladies driving and have been doing so for 40 years.. but would you want to be riding in front of them? I do agree that the DMV should have similar and strict licensing requirements for these as they do for other two wheeled powered vehicles.
>Okay, facts: 1. Scooters are unstable at speed, due to frame geometry. > 2. Scooters lack useable power. Most can't out accelerate > a car. > 3. Scooter brakes are terrible.
1. Fact.. perhaps.... 2. Fact.. in some cases. CERTAINLY NOT all ! 3. CRAP.. My vespa brakes could and would lock both wheels on tar. What more can you ask from a brake than enough friction to lock a wheel? go backwards?
>Those are just the physical problems. The problem of rider experience is >also serious. Most of us would agree that safe motorcycle riding takes >greater traffic skills than safe auto driving. Yet, the regulations over >scooters are MUCH more lax than either autos or motos, which is why they >are so attractive to inexperienced, uneducated riders. I mean, how many >scooter riders you see out there know about counter-steering?
There are shitheads out on Motorcycles and in cars also.. There are probably a few motorcyclists out there that don't actively countersteer too.. Like I said before.. The DMV's should require at least the same licensing regulations as they do for Motorcycles.
>8 years old. And you say scooter riders have experience? See, yours >is a perfect example. Do you really think you were a safe >rider, with that level of experience? Safe enough to be on the streets >where you see scooters now?
I didn't have experience at 8, granted.. NOR was I out riding on the streets. I rode on disused railroad right of way (no tracks, ties, or ballast) and a disused iron ore pit. I put many miles on both scooters and NO physical damage to myself except for a couple of bruises and scrapes. Through riding I did gain experience. I learned the limits of each machine and what things you could NOT expect to do with them.
>And how old were you then? Don't you really think that a kid popping >wheelies on a shimmying frame is a tad bit unsafe?
probably 12 or so. Anyone popping wheelies is a tad bit unsafe. the frame did not shimmy enough to be noticed, but then again I didn't do any flex/stress analyses on it.
>I have a similar story, until I took a fall and realized that these things >have real problems. I mean, I could stop better on my bicycle!
Gee I guess you needed more practice then didn't you big fella.
|I have since only owned motorcycles... I guess I grew out of scooters, |but that doesn't mean they aren't worth a shit.
>Perhaps it doesn't mean that, but they still aren't worth shit.
Perhaps... but that's just your opinion.
>Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions. I have never ridden a >Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden >Honda step-throughs). Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking >(but I doubt it).
So, you're basing your opinion on a Guzzi moped having never ridden a Vespa.. gee, I guess you ARE informed.
>Yeah, right.
Believe what you like.
>Dave Svoboda (ru...@gagme.chi.il.us) | An Angel on a Harley pulls
The only scooter I've evr ridden was a Yamaha 50 of some sort with a CVT. They're really closer to bicycles than to motorcycles, I think. OK, they feel unstable compared to a heavy bike, but I took a scooter down a gravel road (large pieces), almost fell over several times, and each time I just put my foot down and righted myself. Can't do that with my Radian.
Potholes, yeah, the small wheels are worse for that, but same deal. Scooters are very manoeuvrable and easy to handle. Footpegs or not, there's still a decent place to put your feet, and operating a scooter is simple.
All in all I would not say that they're more dangerous, but they have to be ridden differently. You can keep up with traffic sometimes, but you have to know when to keep to the side and let people go, similar to bicycle riding. The little racks and compartments are handy for carrying junk, and it's very common in Montreal to see scooters with milk crates tied to the racks. Scooters have their uses.
I had a different feeling about them when I was in my Oldsmobile on a major highway, and this guy sitting on what looked like a chair was in the middle of my lane going about as fast as one would on a chair and I swerved at the last second and it was a guy on a scooter doing half the speed limit who should have been very happy to be alive at that moment...
I've bike like | Jody Levine DoD #275 got a you can if you -PF | ohrd!jlev...@cs.toronto.edu ride it | Ontario Hydro Research
In article <STINGL.92Feb21133...@moses.fzi.de> sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl) writes:
|>>>>> On 21 Feb 92 05:13:35 GMT, svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) said: | | > Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions. I have never ridden a | > Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden | > Honda step-throughs). Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking | > (but I doubt it). | |Congrats, you've recognized your problem. You've never ridden a Vespa ... | |In europe at least you can't say 'scooter' without saying Vespa.
And the fellow doing the speech about dangerous scooters probably has never SEEN a Vespa. The aren't exactly the rage here. The Japanese scooters are much more popular, and quite bad.
In <1992Feb21.222956.4...@rtsg.mot.com> svob...@rtsg.mot.com
(David Svoboda) writes: >And the fellow doing the speech about dangerous scooters probably has >never SEEN a Vespa. The aren't exactly the rage here. The Japanese >scooters are much more popular, and quite bad.
Just as a data point, my first ride was a '48 Cushman scooter, complete with dual-stage centrifugal clutch and a 5hp Cushman "Husky" motor under the seat. This particular ride weighed around 300lbs and would top out at close to 40mph. Brakes? Foot-pedal operated rear only.
Safe? Not when I compare it to other bikes I've ridden. The small tires and little suspension made themselves known once when I rounded a corner and hit a small object. Luckily, I still have my front teeth as I was close to a dentist's office.
It handled like a toboggan and slowed like a semi. I'll keep my CB750 for now -- it's much safer.
Dan <=========================================================================> <Daniel R. Sorenson Dod #1066 |If Iowa State University agreed with me > <z1...@exnet.iastate.edu <- work |I'd make $90K/yr. They don't, I don't. > <vik...@iastate.edu <- play |"What happens if a big asteroid hits > <Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and > <a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad." - D.Barry> <=========================================================================>
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
(John W. Stichnoth) writes: > ... assert my personal belief ...
Please try to get some facts, not folklore. I hope that my alma mater would emphasize research methods rather than whether you can pull the wool over more eyes than Brother Bob.
I really can't say whether scooters are any more or less dangerous that motorcycles in their design, but I do think there is a problem with the public's general perception of scooters vs. motorcycles. I have witnessed a few two-wheeled accidents in my time, and the worst was definitely not the motorcyclist catching a rut in the road and driving head first into a speed-limit signpost (4x4). He had taken appropriate responsibility with his machine (leather jacket, boots, and helmet, which he was VERY thankful for), and even due to operator error he was able to ride home, bent handlebars and all.
A scooter incident wasn't as happy. I saw a girl approaching a T intersection on the straight-through portion, with no stop sign in her direction. A car on the T leg at a stop sign inched forward a bit, causing her to panic-brake and dump the scooter. At about 25-30mph with no protective gear (t-shirt, shorts, and I believe sandals) it was a less than pleasant sight.
Both of these incidents were due to an error on the rider's part, not due directly to any machine shortcoming. It was just that the scooter rider was not prepared for such an incident at all. I'm sure the scooter was a present from daddy, to get from the dorms to class and back, and probably nobody gave a second thought to safety equipment or training. After all, she wouldn't be riding on the freeway, right?
Motorcycles are generally taken more seriously, and until the same applies to scooters, I will believe that motorcycles are safer, due to the riders that choose to ride them. You must take the appropriate responsibility for what you ride. Education and public awareness (on all sides) will do wonders, where helmet laws, etc., will barely make a dent.
Or at least that's what I've led myself to believe :-)
/ riyadth alkazily riya...@hpbs1904.boi.hp.com (203) 323-4987 work (HP) \ | DoD #0295 1983 BMW R65 (yippee!) (203) 342-3673 home | | When am I going to have time to use all this stuff I'm collecting anyway? | \ More important, how can I get more stuff? Amiga 500+ (+ stuff, that is) /
In article <STINGL.92Feb21133...@moses.fzi.de> sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl) writes: >In europe at least you can't say 'scooter' without saying Vespa. >And the construction features have a touch of genius (except the >brakes ;-)
A co worker rode his Vespa from San Jose up through the Cascades into Canada, along the continental divide to some remote city (?) about 1000 miles north of the border, then back down the coast through Vancouver and Seattle to Eugene, Oregon.
jim -- * Jim Franklin * jam...@btr.com OR {decwrl,mips,fernwood}!btr!jamesf * * I must have been a real jerk in a past life, because I am being * * punished in this life by those I offended. Coincidentally, they * * they are all driving BMWs. *
having ridden little honda elite's i've come to the conclusion that they're relatively safe except occasionally there is a loose nut behind the handlebars that can cause the scooter to do erratic maneuvers
:-)
it's been a long day and it's nice outside and i'm stuck in here
In article <1992Feb20.184743.17...@cco.caltech.edu> ridg...@cco.caltech.edu (Alex Ridgway) writes: >jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:
>>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the >>University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my >>personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled > ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ <-- and only your belief... >>vehicles on the road. Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe > ^^^^^^^^^^^ <-- indeed!!! >>this is true:
> This is one of the scariest things I've seen on this group in a while: >A serious, dedicated motorcyclist preparing to publicly announce how dangerous >certain two-wheeled motor vehicles are. John, do you _really_ think this >will help motorcyclists? Most of the statements you make are not based >on any factual knowledge _or_ on any personal experience (you admit to >being a non-scooter rider).
> John states:
>>1. Scooters have small-diameter wheels ...
> So what? Sure they may be somewhat more affected by bumps, but that doesn't >make scooters dangerous in all situations. Do you suggest that the government >institute minimum wheel size requirements?
Now, I had heard that because they had a smaller wheel base, they were dangerous in the curves.... tell me if I am wrong. I looked at the Helix for almost a year before I fell in love with the Hawk and would have nothing else,...But one of the things that stopped me from getting a scooter were the 'rumors' that they weren't as safe as motorcycles.
Please clarify for me if you actually have any knowledge of this.