Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Google Mail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Are Scooters Dangerous?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 40 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
John W. Stichnoth  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 00:06
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth)
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1992 23:50:23 GMT
Local: Wed 19 Feb 1992 23:50
Subject: Are Scooters Dangerous?
I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road.  Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:

1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire.  I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.

2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems in dealing with cross winds.  Also, their small mass means that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier motorcycle is.

3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.  It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow.  I think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.

These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.  I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.

---
John Stichnoth


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sebastian C Sears  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 01:08
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: s...@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Sebastian C Sears)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:17:11 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 00:17
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:

>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road.  Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:

>1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire.  I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.

>2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems in dealing with cross winds.  Also, their small mass means that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier motorcycle is.

>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

>4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.  It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow.  I think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.

>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.  I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.

        Scooters also are too underpowered... they don't have enough power to:
        a) get out of trouble behind them, like a speeding cager
        b) go with the flow of traffic, making them dangerous to others as well
                as themselves. As a motorcyclist, I'd rather get a speedin
                ticket than go slower than the flow of traffic (I've had to
                prove this on the Bay Bridge... oh well)

=======================Sea-Bass=====================Sears================== ====
   o  1979 Yamaha XS750|Perception    O     Mirage  |     |        1985  Toyota
 _/\_>       Just ride!|             o|             ||~~~~~~\___        4Runner
O,> /O   e-mail: scs8@ |  ~^~^ (====<\|====) ^~^    ||_--____--_)    Just about
cunixb.cc.columbia.edu |Just  ~^~^~^~ | ~^~^  kayak!|  ()    ()  anything else!
   Just because you're paranoid, don't mean they're not after you -- Nirvana
=========================================================================== ====


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas Stingl  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 08:33
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl)
Date: 20 Feb 92 08:13:52 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 08:13
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
ok, the imperium strikes back - let's defend our VESPA ;-)

>>>>> On Wed, 19 Feb 1992 23:50:23 GMT, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) said:

  >> 1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire.  I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.

Where in the hell are you riding your motorcycle? I am living on the
country side with some very old and rough roads and got no problems
yet. Such potholes are dangerous for both motorcycles and scooters!

You should ride some scooters before you talk about upright stability.
I admit there are plenty of scooters where you have a "bad feeling",
but there are also other ones (mine ;-), depends on construction.

  >> 2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems in dealing with cross winds.  Also, their small mass means that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier motorcycle is.

On the other hand the area they show against the wind from the side is
smaller. I remember more problems with my little 50ccm motorcycle.

  >> 3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

can't imagine rapid deceleration with these VESPA brakes :-) are you
nailed on your foot pegs? ;-)

  >> 4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.  It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow.  I think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.

My scooter has no clutch ??? are you sure ??? Once I rode 100 km with
a broken clutch handle; I tell you it was like rodeo ...

If you read this newsgroup for some time, you see beginners ask about
750cc bikes, how about that ? By the way there are less accidents with
scooters than with motorcycles. The speed isn't high and you won't
pass as often as with a motorcycle.

  >> These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.  I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or additions to this list.

There you are. If you need a list of positive aspects, let me know.
Note that I like motorcycles too, little brothers have XS400 and
XV800.

--
Thomas Stingl      dl5sbs      DoD #439      sti...@fzi.de


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Joseph Andy  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 08:53
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: Mark Joseph Andy <ma...@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 03:28:11 -0500
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 08:28
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
Howdy,
jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:

> 3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his
>body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his
>feet, as with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances
>of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

This usually won't be a problem as scooters have those snazzy drum
brakes that can't stop you quickly anyway :-)

Mark

| Mark J. Andy                  WERA NV #813            DoD #813        |
| ma...@andrew.cmu.edu           AMA/CCS AM #811         AMA #700560     |
| Co-founder/Rider, Team RISC and Two Geeks Racing                      |
| '82 Seca 650 (street), '85 RZ350 (track), '78 KM100 (commute-in-snow) |
| I want RZ350 parts like steering damper, fork brace, exhaust, etc...  |


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas Stingl  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 09:06
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl)
Date: 20 Feb 92 08:31:37 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 08:31
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

>>>>> On Thu, 20 Feb 1992 00:17:11 GMT, s...@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Sebastian C Sears) said:

  >>      Scooters also are too underpowered... they don't have enough power to:
  >>      a) get out of trouble behind them, like a speeding cager
  >>      b) go with the flow of traffic, making them dangerous to others as well
  >>              as themselves. As a motorcyclist, I'd rather get a speedin
  >>              ticket than go slower than the flow of traffic (I've had to
  >>              prove this on the Bay Bridge... oh well)

7 kW 2-stroke is good power for 110 kg vehicle. A normal cage has no
chance up to 70 km/h if I want to (I often want to ;-). In higher
regions the acceleration is bad, admitted, so you must take care when
passing at these speeds.
The scooter runs 100 km/h without problems, so if I don't use the
Autobahn I'm really within flow of traffic ...
On long rides I prefer the motorcycle too, but only because of time
and acoustics ;-)

--
Thomas Stingl      dl5sbs      DoD #439      sti...@fzi.de


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Nashville Flash  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 14:32
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: d...@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (The Nashville Flash)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 14:10:46 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 14:10
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

HELL, YES!  A person could die of embarassment just being seen NEAR one.
(Aren't pocket protectors standard scooter accessories?)
=========================================================================== ====
 "No hour of life is lost that is spent in the saddle." - Winston Churchill
    The Nashville Flash   -   d...@vuse.vanderbilt.edu   -   DoD # 412


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
james.j.dutton  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 14:45
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: j...@cbnewsg.cb.att.com (james.j.dutton)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 14:36:29 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 14:36
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:

>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road.  Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:

>---
>John Stichnoth

Da bears do not allow their player's to ride scooters at spring training
in platteville after numerous accidents(Mcmahon and several others
got boo boo's). They may ride their Harley's.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Chambers  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 17:53
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: Robert Chambers <RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Date: Thursday, 20 Feb 1992 10:38:56 EST
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 15:38
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
(John W. Stichnoth) says:

>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University
>of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief
>that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the
>road.  Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:

Bully for you - Why not debate why more people are killed on bicycles
than scooters?  or handguns, or smoking, or domestic violence?  Or
trying to pass Lance (the Jerk) Holst on the track.. (:-)

>1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into
>potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire.
>I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would
>offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.

True, they do.. Cars also have smaller diameter wheels than motorcycles,
take the Austin Mini f'rinstance, they have really small wheels...
If you ride on roads that have potholes big enough to wrench the
wheels right of your scoot, you shouldn't really be riding on it.

>2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems
>in dealing with cross winds.  Also, their small mass means that they are
>more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier
>motorcycle is.

True, but try driving a van or perhaps an 18-wheeler in crosswinds..
this affects everyone.  Pound for pound I don't think the difference
in mass between a scooter and motorcycle is gonna make all that much
difference. Avoid bumps!

>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body
>from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as
>with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over
>the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

This is crap, unadulterated.  Scooters have floorboards... I've never
seen motorcycles with toe clips ala racing bicycles.. so how are your
legs going to fly forward during rapid deceleration?

The only thing a motorcycle has over a scooter in this dept is the
gas tank.. you can use your {gender specific genital words} to slam
in the tank and stop you endo-ing as you decend from warp speed to
impulse power.  (:-)

>4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.
>It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for
>beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow.  I
>think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits
>or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.

What about the inexperience of almost anyone that drives a /mc/car/truck
boat/etc etc  Being on a scooter does not neccessarily mean you have
no experience!  The vehicle does not the driver make.

>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.  I am an
>experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only
>ridden one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and all
>comments or additions to this list.

So basically you're not in the position to give an informed opinion then.

Why don't you ride a scooter for a while?  see what they can and cannot
do and base your speech on fact not "notions".

I didn't really intend to flame you with this, but I am in a position
to give a little more informed opinion of scooters and their ilk.

My 2 first 2-wheeled powered vehicles were scooters!, when I was
8 years old my grandfather located a non working Vespa 90 for me
to tinker with.  It had the carb missing and some cables broken, but
I snarfed an old AMAL carb from something and some new cables and
it ran well.  I had lots of fun with it and rode the piss out of it.
Mostly in the dirt and up hills..  I eventually sold it for 13 U.K.
pounds when I moved.

The next one was a Vespa 125.. this thing had 1 more gear than the
90 and a bucket full more balls.  This scooter could pop and hold
wheelies, go 70 mph flat out, Pull my sister behind on a piece of
roofing sheet metal (corrugated iron) with no problem.

I have since only owned motorcycles... I guess I grew out of scooters,
but that doesn't mean they aren't worth a shit.

I hope your public speaking prof doesn't grade on factual information
otherwise your up shit creek.

>John Stichnoth

Regards

Robert
DoD 191   Ex scooter pilot.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alex Ridgway  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 19:11
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: ridg...@cco.caltech.edu (Alex Ridgway)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 18:47:43 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 18:47
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:

>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the
>University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my
>personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled

 ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ <-- and only your belief...
>vehicles on the road.  Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe

                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^ <-- indeed!!!

>this is true:

  This is one of the scariest things I've seen on this group in a while:
A serious, dedicated motorcyclist preparing to publicly announce how dangerous
certain two-wheeled motor vehicles are.  John, do you _really_ think this
will help motorcyclists?  Most of the statements you make are not based
on any factual knowledge _or_ on any personal experience (you admit to
being a non-scooter rider).

  John states:

>1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels ...

  So what?  Sure they may be somewhat more affected by bumps, but that doesn't
make scooters dangerous in all situations. Do you suggest that the government
institute minimum wheel size requirements?

>2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems...

  Sure, but it can also help in many ways.  Suppose your speech said how
dangerous motorcycles were because of their light weight campared to cars?

>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body
>from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as
>with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over
>the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

  This is ridiculous. I suppose sportbike riders with rear mounted footpegs
are always going over the bars due to the fact they can't stop their forward
motion with their feet.

>4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders...

  "My final reason why motorcycles are dangerous and should be banned is that
so many motorcycle riders are so inexperienced..."  Experience of riders
has *** nothing *** to do with the safety of the vehicle.

>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.

  Right again.

>I am an experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have
>only ridden one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and

      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ obviously.  Let me guess -- you
                                     didn't like it.

>all comments or additions to this list.
>---
>John Stichnoth

   I've got one big comment: give it up! The people who hear this speech aren't
going to go out thinking "Gee, motorcycles are so much safer than scooters."
They're going to think -- "Gee, those scooters are really dangerous.  I
think that motorized two-wheel vehicles are just a bad idea!"

  Why not spend your time and effort instead on giving a speech on the
_positive_ aspects of a form of motorcycling that _you_ enjoy, instead of
trying to put down someone else's preferred form a transportation?  Don't
forget, today's scooter riders may be tomorrow's "real" motorcyclists.

  -- Alex Ridgway   DoD #48  --- *** ---   I don't ride a scooter, either.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jean-Noel Moyne  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 20 Feb 1992, 22:47
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: jnmo...@lbl.gov (Jean-Noel Moyne)
Date: 20 Feb 1992 22:41:20 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 22:41
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
(John W. Stichnoth) writes:
>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University of

Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief that
scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the road.  Here
are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:

>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.  I am an

experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only ridden
one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and all comments or
additions to this list.


        This is not mindless flaming, but right there in these last sentences I see
enough to react:

        You say it yourself: You are talking about things you pulled out of your head,
you have not experienced any of them. You have only ridden a scooter on a few
occasions.

        It looks to me like you are talking about something you don't know !! And this
is exactly the same kind of behaviour most of the motorcycle riders have to
fight. This is exactly what creates problems and trouble. People thinking they
have the ultimate knowledge while they don't know shit ! (sorry, excuse my uh
... not my French, my English (-:).

        You are acting exactly like a law maker, an old man that only rides limos with
chauffeur any more, and that says: "One day, I was smoking a cigar in the back
of my Cadillac when as I was looking outside I saw a motorcycle pass us at what
seemed a very high speed... Probably 80 mph ! I thought 'this is dangerous'.
That's why I am now campaining to [limit power of the bikes/limit their
speed/ban them on some freeways/etc ...] (pick up your own non-sense here).".

        And so, as a motorcyclist you are going to say: "This guy dosen't know what he
is talking about". The same way some scooter guy might say the same thing
listening to you.

        I am not a scooter rider, and so far the only problem you expose that I know
to be true because I've seen it is the last one. You can ride a scooter with no
or very little education of the rules of the street, it's like being a bicycle
rider, except you go much faster. A fair number of scooter riders have just
never learned how to ride and are dangerous for that, not for the fact they
ride a scooter, it would be the same thing on a moped.

        I could argue quite strongly all your other points, but it is not my goal
here.

        JNM


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jonathan E. Quist  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 00:00
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: j...@i88.isc.com (Jonathan E. Quist)
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1992 23:02:41 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 23:02
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:

(in very long lines)

>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

What do foot pegs have to do with not moving forward?
Or do you ride with highway pegs only???? :')

--
Jonathan E. Quist                              INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation
j...@i88.isc.com                                        Naperville, IL
'71 CL450-K4 "Gleep"
DoD #094        "I'm not mad; just terribly, terribly hurt."  HDM #007


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Martyn J. Wheeler  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 03:08
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: sas...@laverda.unx.sas.com (Martyn J. Wheeler)
Date: 20 Feb 92 18:50:18 GMT
Local: Thurs 20 Feb 1992 18:50
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (John W. Stichnoth) writes:

>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the
>University of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my
>personal belief that scooters are the most dangerous form of
>two-wheeled vehicles on the road.  Here are some of my assumptions as
>to why I believe this is true:

Oh, dear, flamebait.  You present an incorrect unsupported premise,
and procede to bring forth the assumptions on which this premise is
based.  Readers will notice that most of these assumptions include
vague terms like "I would also think that..." and can therefore be
accepted as fact.

>1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down
>into potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch
>motorcycles tire.  I'm no physics major, but I would also think that
>the small wheels would offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby
>result in less upright stability.

Never ridden one, have you?

>2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause
>problems in dealing with cross winds.  Also, their small mass means
>that they are more likely to change direction after hitting bumps,
>than a heavier motorcycle is.

Actually if you believe your assumption (4) that accounts for sudden
and unexpected changes of direction by itself: "Never ascribe to
external factors that which can be explained by operator head space
error."

>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his
>body from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his
>feet, as with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances
>of going over the handlebars during rapid deceleration.

Let's ask John Sloan about this one, shall we?  Hey, John, how many
times have you gone over the handlebars on your FLHS?  How *do* you
stay on the bike when you use those triple disc brakes?  Or have you
replaced the footboards with pegs?

>4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter
>riders.  It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no
>clutch for beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be
>starting out slow.  I think that inexperienced scooter riders often
>don't learn their own limits or the limits of the scooter until an
>accident occurs.

Yup.  Just like all those wrecked Goof2's and FZR600R's.  The
inexperienced foolish rider will get it every time, no matter what
they're on.  It doesn't take squids long to "learn to ride" ZX-11's
either -- just show them which control is which and they're on their
way.

Anyway, what's this junk about "no clutch?"  Any scooter worthy of the
name has a 3- or 4-speed transmission with a real clutch.

>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.

I can tell.  Does your brain work without carriage returns as well?

Further comments: You are so off base on this that you forgot to
mention that they are underpowered.  Of course, real scooters have
motors somewhere in the range 350-750cc, so we'll throw that out too.

I think I would assume that your task is to present an untenable
argument, which will win you much kudos in the debating team.  Or
perhaps you intend to become a politician, and are practicing your
reasons for banning motorcycles when you are elected?

Let me see if I can come up with some more assumptions to support your
case:

5) Riding scooters is cool.  All the innocent daughters of local
citizens will ride on them and die.

6) Riding scooters is cool.  All the innocent daughters of local
citizens will go out with scooter riders, take drugs, and become
pregnant.

7) All scooters are red, and everyone knows that red is the colour of
the devil.

8) The fuel tank of a scooter contains gasoline, which will explode if
the scooter falls over.

9) Scooters have handlebars, and beginners are more used to car
steering wheels and will therefore turn them the wrong way in corners.

10) Scooters are temptingly cheap, and will cause the nation's youth
to get credit cards and become bankrupt.

11) Scooters are temptingly cheap, and will cause the nation's youth
to sell drugs to support their scooter habit.  Many scooters have a
secret luggage compartment under the seat just for this reason!

12) Scooters are so manoeuverable that they are used by organised
crime as courier vehicles.  Anyone riding a scooter will be forced to
join the mafia.

13) Scooters are the chosen transport of Hells Angels, now that they
are too recognisable on bikes.

14) The Klu Klux Klan uses scooters so that their robes don't catch in
the wheels.

15) Since robes don't catch in the wheels, scooters encourage monks
and nuns to ride around and get involved in sinful activities.

16) Some scooters have the ancient words "VESPA", "MIACO" (sp?), and
"LAMBRETTA" on them, which we all know are the names of demons who
engineered St. Christopher's martyrdom.

I hope you will add these points to your speech to support your
personal belief.  I think the Public Speaking class will enjoy them.

(Note to readers: I'd add a :-) but I'm afraid this person thinks that
it is just fine to invent assumptions to support personal belief.)

Next week: Mr. Stichnoth will present his assumptions to assert his
personal belief that helmet law opponents are space aliens who are
holding Elvis prisoner. :-)

--
Martyn
-------------sas...@unx.sas.com----(Martyn J. Wheeler)----DoD #293------------
SAS Institute, Inc: (919) 677-8000 ext.7954    H: (919) 839-0092 (Raleigh, NC)
          "If you spin, you deserve to die" -- Mike Hawthorn
       "I love competition, but I hate conflict" -- Alain Prost


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Svoboda  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 11:43
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1992 05:13:35 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 05:13
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <92051.103856RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> Robert Chambers <RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:

|In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
|(John W. Stichnoth) says:
|>
|>I am preparing a speech for my Public Speaking class here at the University
|>of Illinois (Champaign-Urbana) in which I plan to assert my personal belief
|>that scooters are the most dangerous form of two-wheeled vehicles on the
|>road.  Here are some of my assumptions as to why I believe this is true:
|
|>1.  Scooters have small-diameter wheels which will sink further down into
|>potholes and other depressions, than a regular 17-21 inch motorcycles tire.
|>I'm no physics major, but I would also think that the small wheels would
|>offer less gyroscopic effect, and thereby result in less upright stability.
|
|True, they do.. Cars also have smaller diameter wheels than motorcycles,
|take the Austin Mini f'rinstance, they have really small wheels...
|If you ride on roads that have potholes big enough to wrench the
|wheels right of your scoot, you shouldn't really be riding on it.

Curbs.  Hit a curb on a bicycle and you will likely go up and over the
curb.  A motorcycle will also go up and over, possibly scraping something.  
A car will trash the suspension, but not you.  Hit a curb on a scooter and
you are toast.  I know this from experience.

|>2.  Their light weight (especially the 50cc varieties) can cause problems
|>in dealing with cross winds.  Also, their small mass means that they are
|>more likely to change direction after hitting bumps, than a heavier
|>motorcycle is.
|
|True, but try driving a van or perhaps an 18-wheeler in crosswinds..
|this affects everyone.  Pound for pound I don't think the difference
|in mass between a scooter and motorcycle is gonna make all that much
|difference. Avoid bumps!

Yup.  And bumps are everywhere.  But I do agree that wind is no worse
than on a mc, except that the steering geometry is often poor, and that
affects handling in general, including wind handling.

|>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body
|>from moving forward when the brakes are applied (instead of his feet, as
|>with a motorcycle).  I think this would increase the chances of going over
|>the handlebars during rapid deceleration.
|
|This is crap, unadulterated.  Scooters have floorboards... I've never
|seen motorcycles with toe clips ala racing bicycles.. so how are your
|legs going to fly forward during rapid deceleration?

Your whole lower body flies forward on a scooter.  Floorboards don't do
shit.  Why do you think that you often see people riding around with
their feet on the downtubes?  

I think he was referring to a cruiser styled motorcycle, with forward
pegs.  You can stand on those.

|The only thing a motorcycle has over a scooter in this dept is the
|gas tank.. you can use your {gender specific genital words} to slam
|in the tank and stop you endo-ing as you decend from warp speed to
|impulse power.  (:-)

Crap.  You are SUPPOSED to squeeze the tank with your knees.  That you
cannot do on a step-through.

|>4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.
|>It doesn't take long for beginners to learn to rideThere's no clutch for
|>beginners to learn how to use, so they might not be starting out slow.  I
|>think that inexperienced scooter riders often don't learn their own limits
|>or the limits of the scooter until an accident occurs.
|
|What about the inexperience of almost anyone that drives a /mc/car/truck
|boat/etc etc  Being on a scooter does not neccessarily mean you have
|no experience!  The vehicle does not the driver make.

Inexperience of car drivers?  Most car drivers have been driving for upwards
of ten years.  Most scooter drivers are teenagers without even more than a
drivers permit, and lots of bicycle experience, which they thinks prepares
them for riding a scooter in traffic.  They are quite mistaken.

|>These four items are just things that I pulled out of my head.  I am an
|>experienced motorcycle rider, but I don't own a scooter, and have only
|>ridden one on a few occaisions.  I would greatly appreciate any and all
|>comments or additions to this list.
|
|So basically you're not in the position to give an informed opinion then.
|
|Why don't you ride a scooter for a while?  see what they can and cannot
|do and base your speech on fact not "notions".

Okay, facts:    1. Scooters are unstable at speed, due to frame geometry.
                2. Scooters lack useable power.  Most can't out accelerate
                        a car.
                3. Scooter brakes are terrible.

Those are just the physical problems.  The problem of rider experience is
also serious.  Most of us would agree that safe motorcycle riding takes
greater traffic skills than safe auto driving.  Yet, the regulations over
scooters are MUCH more lax than either autos or motos, which is why they
are so attractive to inexperienced, uneducated riders.  I mean, how many
scooter riders you see out there know about counter-steering?

|I didn't really intend to flame you with this, but I am in a position
|to give a little more informed opinion of scooters and their ilk.
|
|My 2 first 2-wheeled powered vehicles were scooters!, when I was
|8 years old my grandfather located a non working Vespa 90 for me
|to tinker with.  It had the carb missing and some cables broken, but
|I snarfed an old AMAL carb from something and some new cables and
|it ran well.  I had lots of fun with it and rode the piss out of it.
|Mostly in the dirt and up hills..  I eventually sold it for 13 U.K.
|pounds when I moved.

8 years old.  And you say scooter riders have experience?  See, yours
is a perfect example.  Do you really think you were a safe
rider, with that level of experience?  Safe enough to be on the streets
where you see scooters now?

|The next one was a Vespa 125.. this thing had 1 more gear than the
|90 and a bucket full more balls.  This scooter could pop and hold
|wheelies, go 70 mph flat out, Pull my sister behind on a piece of
|roofing sheet metal (corrugated iron) with no problem.

And how old were you then?  Don't you really think that a kid popping
wheelies on a shimmying frame is a tad bit unsafe?

I have a similar story, until I took a fall and realized that these things
have real problems.  I mean, I could stop better on my bicycle!

|I have since only owned motorcycles... I guess I grew out of scooters,
|but that doesn't mean they aren't worth a shit.

Perhaps it doesn't mean that, but they still aren't worth shit.

Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions.  I have never ridden a
Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden
Honda step-throughs).  Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking
(but I doubt it).

|Regards

Yeah, right.

Dave Svoboda (ru...@gagme.chi.il.us)        | An Angel on a Harley pulls
90 Concours  (Mmmmmmmmmmmm)                 | across to greet a fellow
81 KZ550 Rat (The Little Engine That Could) | Rolling Stone.
AMA ...let me get it out..oh yes... 583905  | He says, "Where ya been,
DoD #0330  "Too late for a quote"           | where ya 'goin?" -- R Waters


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Joseph Andy  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 11:51
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: ma...@andrew.cmu.edu (Mark Joseph Andy)
Date: 21 Feb 92 08:34:29 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 08:34
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
Howdy,

Actually, I'd like to see scooters outlawed for a completely different
reason...

        They make our people look like absolute fools.

:-):-)
^^^^^^^^^^
Note smiley indicating that I'm making a tounge-in-check joke here.
Feel free to flame me if it wasn't very funny/whatever, but NOT
because we really shouldn't outlaw scooters.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Please read the above before you flame... oh, the hell with it.  You
guys are gonna flame the shit outta me anyway, so I might just as well
accept it and stick to my guns.  ALL SCOOTERS SUCK!!!  PEOPLE WHO RIDE
THEM (except for the racer types in Motorcyclist a while back) DESERVE
TO BE SLOWLY ROASTED OVER A BEEMER JUG!!!!

MWUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

;^}

Mark

| Mark J. Andy                  WERA NV #813            DoD #813        |
| ma...@andrew.cmu.edu           AMA/CCS AM #811         AMA #700560     |
| Co-founder/Rider, Team RISC and Two Geeks Racing                      |
| '82 Seca 650 (street), '85 RZ350 (track), '78 KM100 (commute-in-snow) |
| I want RZ350 parts like steering damper, fork brace, exhaust, etc...  |


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas Stingl  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 12:48
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1992 12:34:56 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 12:34
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

>>>>> On 21 Feb 92 05:13:35 GMT, svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) said:

 > Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions.  I have never ridden a
 > Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden
 > Honda step-throughs).  Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking
 > (but I doubt it).

Congrats, you've recognized your problem. You've never ridden a Vespa ...

In europe at least you can't say 'scooter' without saying Vespa.
And the construction features have a touch of genius (except the
brakes ;-)

It's not by chance that mainly Vespa riders defend the image of
scooters.  

--
Thomas Stingl  dl5sbs  DoD#439  sti...@fzi.de


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Robert Chambers  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 16:14
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: Robert Chambers <RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET>
Date: Friday, 21 Feb 1992 09:59:42 EST
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 14:59
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb21.051335.7...@rtsg.mot.com>, svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David
Svoboda) says:

>In article <92051.103856RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> Robert Chambers
><RM...@CUNYVM.BITNET> writes:
>|In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>,

jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
|(John W. Stichnoth) says:
|>

>Curbs.  Hit a curb on a bicycle and you will likely go up and over the
>curb.  A motorcycle will also go up and over, possibly scraping something.
>A car will trash the suspension, but not you.  Hit a curb on a scooter and
>you are toast.  I know this from experience.

I had hit objects like tire ruts, small logs, etc while riding the
scooter.  If you aren't holding onto the handlebars tightly, they
might be snapped out of your hands.. but that goes for motorcycles too.

|difference. Avoid bumps!

>Yup.  And bumps are everywhere.  But I do agree that wind is no worse
>than on a mc, except that the steering geometry is often poor, and that
>affects handling in general, including wind handling.

|>3.  Without foot pegs, the rider must use his arms more to keep his body

>Your whole lower body flies forward on a scooter.  Floorboards don't do
>shit.  Why do you think that you often see people riding around with
>their feet on the downtubes?

I don't know which well your and mr. Stichnoth are pulling your data
from, but unless you are riding "limp" on the saddle when you stop
you aren't going to "fly forward"  My scooters had a foot brake for
the rear wheel, and while applying that, NOTHING flew forward.

>I think he was referring to a cruiser styled motorcycle, with forward
>pegs.  You can stand on those.

Whatever... it makes no difference.  If you aren't riding like a wet
bar rag your legs won't neccessarily give way.

|The only thing a motorcycle has over a scooter in this dept is the
|gas tank.. you can use your {gender specific genital words} to slam
|in the tank and stop you endo-ing as you decend from warp speed to
|impulse power.  (:-)

Crap.  You are SUPPOSED to squeeze the tank with your knees.  That you
cannot do on a step-through.

Oooohhh A FACT!!! A FACT!!

|>4.  My final assumption concerns the inexperience of many scooter riders.

>Inexperience of car drivers?  Most car drivers have been driving for upwards
>of ten years.  Most scooter drivers are teenagers without even more than a
>drivers permit, and lots of bicycle experience, which they thinks prepares
>them for riding a scooter in traffic.  They are quite mistaken.

Dave, this is flamebait.  Length of time driving a car on roads does
not neccessarily give an indication of driving prowess!  There are old
blue haired ladies driving and have been doing so for 40 years.. but
would you want to be riding in front of them?  I do agree that the
DMV should have similar and strict licensing requirements for these
as they do for other two wheeled powered vehicles.

>Okay, facts:    1. Scooters are unstable at speed, due to frame geometry.
>                2. Scooters lack useable power.  Most can't out accelerate
>                        a car.
>                3. Scooter brakes are terrible.

1.  Fact.. perhaps....
2.  Fact.. in some cases.  CERTAINLY NOT all !
3.  CRAP.. My vespa brakes could and would lock both wheels on tar.
    What more can you ask from a brake than enough friction to lock
    a wheel?   go backwards?

>Those are just the physical problems.  The problem of rider experience is
>also serious.  Most of us would agree that safe motorcycle riding takes
>greater traffic skills than safe auto driving.  Yet, the regulations over
>scooters are MUCH more lax than either autos or motos, which is why they
>are so attractive to inexperienced, uneducated riders.  I mean, how many
>scooter riders you see out there know about counter-steering?

There are shitheads out on Motorcycles and in cars also..  There are
probably a few motorcyclists out there that don't actively countersteer
too.. Like I said before.. The DMV's should require at least the same
licensing regulations as they do for Motorcycles.

>8 years old.  And you say scooter riders have experience?  See, yours
>is a perfect example.  Do you really think you were a safe
>rider, with that level of experience?  Safe enough to be on the streets
>where you see scooters now?

I didn't have experience at 8, granted.. NOR was I out riding on the
streets.  I rode on disused railroad right of way (no tracks, ties, or
ballast) and a disused iron ore pit.  I put many miles on both scooters
and NO physical damage to myself except for a couple of bruises and
scrapes.  Through riding I did gain experience.  I learned the limits
of each machine and what things you could NOT expect to do with them.

>And how old were you then?  Don't you really think that a kid popping
>wheelies on a shimmying frame is a tad bit unsafe?

probably 12 or so.  Anyone popping wheelies is a tad bit unsafe.
the frame did not shimmy enough to be noticed, but then again I didn't
do any flex/stress analyses on it.

>I have a similar story, until I took a fall and realized that these things
>have real problems.  I mean, I could stop better on my bicycle!

Gee I guess you needed more practice then didn't you big fella.

|I have since only owned motorcycles... I guess I grew out of scooters,
|but that doesn't mean they aren't worth a shit.

>Perhaps it doesn't mean that, but they still aren't worth shit.

Perhaps... but that's just your opinion.

>Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions.  I have never ridden a
>Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden
>Honda step-throughs).  Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking
>(but I doubt it).

So, you're basing your opinion on a Guzzi moped having never ridden
a Vespa.. gee, I guess you ARE informed.

>Yeah, right.

Believe what you like.

>Dave Svoboda (ru...@gagme.chi.il.us)        | An Angel on a Harley pulls

Regards (even with your opinion)

Robert
DoD 191


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jody Levine  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 21 Feb 1992, 21:29
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: ohrd!jlev...@cs.toronto.edu (Jody Levine)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 92 14:58:51 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 14:58
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
The only scooter I've evr ridden was a Yamaha 50 of some sort with a CVT.
They're really closer to bicycles than to motorcycles, I think. OK, they
feel unstable compared to a heavy bike, but I took a scooter down a gravel
road (large pieces), almost fell over several times, and each time I just
put my foot down and righted myself. Can't do that with my Radian.

Potholes, yeah, the small wheels are worse for that, but same deal. Scooters
are very manoeuvrable and easy to handle. Footpegs or not, there's still a
decent place to put your feet, and operating a scooter is simple.

All in all I would not say that they're more dangerous, but they have to be
ridden differently. You can keep up with traffic sometimes, but you have
to know when to keep to the side and let people go, similar to bicycle
riding. The little racks and compartments are handy for carrying junk, and
it's very common in Montreal to see scooters with milk crates tied to
the racks. Scooters have their uses.

I had a different feeling about them when I was in my Oldsmobile on a major
highway, and this guy sitting on what looked like a chair was in the middle
of my lane going about as fast as one would on a chair and I swerved at
the last second and it was a guy on a scooter doing half the speed limit
who should have been very happy to be alive at that moment...

I've        bike                      like       | Jody Levine    DoD #275
     got a       you can        if you      -PF  | ohrd!jlev...@cs.toronto.edu
                         ride it                 | Ontario Hydro Research


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Richard Armstrong  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 22 Feb 1992, 06:07
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: rarms...@den.mmc.com (Richard Armstrong)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1992 21:29:54 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 21:29
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
Sorry, but shouldn't this discussion be moved to
rec.scooters.motorcycles.NOT! ?

--
All comments are hereby disclaimed.
Richard Armstrong                Email:rarms...@t4cma-gw.den.mmc.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Svoboda  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 22 Feb 1992, 06:55
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1992 22:29:56 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 22:29
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <STINGL.92Feb21133...@moses.fzi.de> sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl) writes:

|>>>>> On 21 Feb 92 05:13:35 GMT, svob...@rtsg.mot.com (David Svoboda) said:
|
| > Of course, there are undoubtedly exceptions.  I have never ridden a
| > Vespa (mine was actually a Guzzi moped, with pedals, but I have ridden
| > Honda step-throughs).  Maybe Vespa's rival a goof2 for handling a braking
| > (but I doubt it).
|
|Congrats, you've recognized your problem. You've never ridden a Vespa ...
|
|In europe at least you can't say 'scooter' without saying Vespa.

And the fellow doing the speech about dangerous scooters probably has
never SEEN a Vespa.  The aren't exactly the rage here.  The Japanese
scooters are much more popular, and quite bad.

                                Dave


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dan Sorenson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 22 Feb 1992, 07:04
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: vik...@iastate.edu (Dan Sorenson)
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1992 03:08:47 GMT
Local: Sat 22 Feb 1992 03:08
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In <1992Feb21.222956.4...@rtsg.mot.com> svob...@rtsg.mot.com

 (David Svoboda) writes:
>And the fellow doing the speech about dangerous scooters probably has
>never SEEN a Vespa.  The aren't exactly the rage here.  The Japanese
>scooters are much more popular, and quite bad.

        Just as a data point, my first ride was a '48 Cushman scooter,
complete with dual-stage centrifugal clutch and a 5hp Cushman "Husky"
motor under the seat.  This particular ride weighed around 300lbs and
would top out at close to 40mph.  Brakes?  Foot-pedal operated rear only.

        Safe?  Not when I compare it to other bikes I've ridden.  The
small tires and little suspension made themselves known once when I
rounded a corner and hit a small object.  Luckily, I still have my
front teeth as I was close to a dentist's office.

        It handled like a toboggan and slowed like a semi.  I'll keep
my CB750 for now -- it's much safer.

                                Dan
<=========================================================================>
<Daniel R. Sorenson   Dod #1066  |If Iowa State University agreed with me >
<z1...@exnet.iastate.edu <- work |I'd make $90K/yr.  They don't, I don't. >
<vik...@iastate.edu      <- play |"What happens if a big asteroid hits    >
<Earth?  Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and >
<a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad." - D.Barry>
<=========================================================================>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rinewalt  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 22 Feb 1992, 17:56
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: rinew...@riogrande.cs.tcu.edu
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1992 02:51:19 GMT
Local: Sat 22 Feb 1992 02:51
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?
In article <1992Feb19.235023.17...@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> jws34...@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
(John W. Stichnoth) writes:
> ... assert my personal belief ...

Please try to get some facts, not folklore. I hope that my alma mater would
emphasize research methods rather than whether you can pull the wool over more
eyes than Brother Bob.

Dick Rinewalt


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Riyadth Al-Kazily  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 23 Feb 1992, 14:37
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: riya...@hpdmd48.boi.hp.com (Riyadth Al-Kazily)
Date: 21 Feb 92 18:21:42 GMT
Local: Fri 21 Feb 1992 18:21
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

I really can't say whether scooters are any more or less dangerous
that motorcycles in their design, but I do think there is a problem
with the public's general perception of scooters vs. motorcycles.
I have witnessed a few two-wheeled accidents in my time, and the
worst was definitely not the motorcyclist catching a rut in the
road and driving head first into a speed-limit signpost (4x4).  He
had taken appropriate responsibility with his machine (leather
jacket, boots, and helmet, which he was VERY thankful for), and
even due to operator error he was able to ride home, bent handlebars
and all.

A scooter incident wasn't as happy.  I saw a girl approaching a
T intersection on the straight-through portion, with no stop sign
in her direction.  A car on the T leg at a stop sign inched forward
a bit, causing her to panic-brake and dump the scooter.  At about
25-30mph with no protective gear (t-shirt, shorts, and I believe
sandals) it was a less than pleasant sight.

Both of these incidents were due to an error on the rider's part,
not due directly to any machine shortcoming.  It was just that the
scooter rider was not prepared for such an incident at all.  I'm
sure the scooter was a present from daddy, to get from the dorms to
class and back, and probably nobody gave a second thought to safety
equipment or training.  After all, she wouldn't be riding on the
freeway, right?

Motorcycles are generally taken more seriously, and until the same
applies to scooters, I will believe that motorcycles are safer, due
to the riders that choose to ride them.  You must take the appropriate
responsibility for what you ride.  Education and public awareness
(on all sides) will do wonders, where helmet laws, etc., will barely
make a dent.

Or at least that's what I've led myself to believe :-)

/ riyadth alkazily   riya...@hpbs1904.boi.hp.com   (203) 323-4987 work (HP) \
| DoD #0295   1983 BMW R65 (yippee!)               (203) 342-3673 home      |
| When am I going to have time to use all this stuff I'm collecting anyway? |
\ More important, how can I get more stuff?   Amiga 500+ (+ stuff, that is) /


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
James G. Franklin jamesf@btr.com  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 25 Feb 1992, 08:15
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: jam...@public.BTR.COM (James G. Franklin jam...@btr.com)
Date: 24 Feb 92 21:42:31 GMT
Local: Mon 24 Feb 1992 21:42
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

In article <STINGL.92Feb21133...@moses.fzi.de> sti...@fzi.de (Thomas Stingl) writes:
>In europe at least you can't say 'scooter' without saying Vespa.
>And the construction features have a touch of genius (except the
>brakes ;-)

A co worker rode his Vespa from San Jose up through the Cascades into Canada,
along the continental divide to some remote city (?) about 1000 miles north
of the border, then back down the coast through Vancouver and Seattle to
Eugene, Oregon.

jim
--
*   Jim Franklin * jam...@btr.com OR {decwrl,mips,fernwood}!btr!jamesf  *
*    I must have been a real jerk in a past life, because I am being    *
*    punished in this life by those I offended. Coincidentally, they    *
*    they are all driving BMWs.                                         *


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lara J Allen  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 26 Feb 1992, 06:12
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: l...@sgi.com (Lara J Allen)
Date: 25 Feb 92 23:15:48 GMT
Local: Tues 25 Feb 1992 23:15
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

having ridden little honda elite's
i've come to the conclusion that
they're relatively safe except
occasionally there is a loose nut
behind the handlebars that can
cause the scooter to do erratic
maneuvers

:-)

it's been a long day
and it's nice outside
and i'm stuck in here

lara
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
  /\ /\       |   l...@sgi.sgi.com   (yorgi's home)  (415) 335-1609
   . .        |--------------------------------------------------------------
  =   =       |Silicon Graphics Customer Support  


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lorra L. Moore  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 26 Feb 1992, 17:51
Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
From: mo...@UHIBPD.phys.uh.edu (Lorra L. Moore)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1992 17:31:43 GMT
Local: Wed 26 Feb 1992 17:31
Subject: Re: Are Scooters Dangerous?

Now, I had heard that because they had a smaller wheel base, they were
dangerous in the curves.... tell me if I am wrong. I looked at the Helix
for almost a year before I fell in love with the Hawk and would have
nothing else,...But one of the things that stopped me from getting a
scooter were the 'rumors' that they weren't as safe as motorcycles.

Please clarify for me if you actually have any knowledge of this.

Lorra


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 40   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google