K9way wrote: > I wonder how Negraneau and those morons here who thought Moon was 10% > against the field , when he had the chip lead , feel now ??
That he had/has a 10% shot. He has had his bluffs caught, and taken out very good players very much on the bad side.
10% against the field is not zero percent, and if he makes wins it or doesn't win it, it will never be able to tell me who was right and who was wrong.
What I feel now is that he is playing bad and getting there. And others were playing well and not. And Ivey, who shulman says was playing perfectly, got his ass handed to him, by a guy who didn't think he was behind.
In the end still feels like a 10% shot. They get there once out of every ten times, and I am pretty sure that is how it would have come out given 10 chances.
I think this is perfectly described. This IS the 10%. From what I understand, I don't think he can play any worse. He folded a hand on the flop where he should've callled if he had 3 outs, and he won twice as a 3-1 and a 11-1 dog. I think I might be able to win a tournament under those circumstances!!! On Nov 8 2009 9:04 PM, johnny_t wrote:
> K9way wrote: > > I wonder how Negraneau and those morons here who thought Moon was 10% > > against the field , when he had the chip lead , feel now ??
> That he had/has a 10% shot. He has had his bluffs caught, and taken out > very good players very much on the bad side.
> 10% against the field is not zero percent, and if he makes wins it or > doesn't win it, it will never be able to tell me who was right and who > was wrong.
> What I feel now is that he is playing bad and getting there. And others > were playing well and not. And Ivey, who shulman says was playing > perfectly, got his ass handed to him, by a guy who didn't think he was > behind.
> In the end still feels like a 10% shot. They get there once out of > every ten times, and I am pretty sure that is how it would have come out > given 10 chances.
----- RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
> K9way wrote: > > I wonder how Negraneau and those morons here who thought Moon was 10% > > against the field , when he had the chip lead , feel now ??
> That he had/has a 10% shot. He has had his bluffs caught, and taken out > very good players very much on the bad side.
> 10% against the field is not zero percent, and if he makes wins it or > doesn't win it, it will never be able to tell me who was right and who > was wrong.
> I think this is perfectly described. This IS the 10%. From what I > understand, I don't think he can play any worse. He folded a hand on the > flop where he should've callled if he had 3 outs, and he won twice as a > 3-1 and a 11-1 dog. I think I might be able to win a tournament under > those circumstances!!!
You dont seem to get it ..ANYONE CAN AND HAS WON THAT TOURNAMENT .
raymer never got any pair beat in the last 10 hours .
gold flopped a pat hand every time he saw a flop
the asian guy called all his money with an A-5 in a spot where it couldnt possibly be any good (but it was)
These are TVSM's who have simply beaten the laws of probability ..many times over .
IF THIS WERE A 'SKILL" EVENT ..YOU WOULD HAVE SEEN MORE BIG NAMES AT THE FINAL TABLE .
How many "big name " players have you seen at the final tables in the last 5 years ?
maybe 3 ???? maybe 4 ?
FOR ANYONE TO THINK MOON WAS 9-1 AGAINST THE FIELD WITH 60MIL IN CHIPS IS JUST PLAIN FOOLISH
AT WORST ..MAYBE 5-1
_____________________________________________________________________ RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
> > I think this is perfectly described. This IS the 10%. From what I > > understand, I don't think he can play any worse. He folded a hand on the > > flop where he should've callled if he had 3 outs, and he won twice as a > > 3-1 and a 11-1 dog. I think I might be able to win a tournament under > > those circumstances!!!
> You dont seem to get it ..ANYONE CAN AND HAS WON THAT TOURNAMENT .
> raymer never got any pair beat in the last 10 hours .
> gold flopped a pat hand every time he saw a flop
> the asian guy called all his money with an A-5 in a spot where it couldnt > possibly be any good (but it was)
Rahme made two critical mistakes on that hand; first, bluffing into a calling station, and second, talking way too much. He basically talked Yang into making the call.
Michael U.S. American
----------------- "Frankly, I think this was a good post. And on its merit too, not just because you jammed it up Irish Mike's ass pretty good. Icing on the cake. lol"
-Paul Popinjay, 3/19/08
_____________________________________________________________________ RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
> > I wonder how Negraneau and those morons here who thought Moon was 10% > > against the field , when he had the chip lead , feel now ??
> That he had/has a 10% shot. He has had his bluffs caught, and taken out > very good players very much on the bad side.
> 10% against the field is not zero percent, and if he makes wins it or > doesn't win it, it will never be able to tell me who was right and who > was wrong.
> What I feel now is that he is playing bad and getting there. And others > were playing well and not. And Ivey, who shulman says was playing > perfectly, got his ass handed to him, by a guy who didn't think he was > behind.
> In the end still feels like a 10% shot. They get there once out of > every ten times, and I am pretty sure that is how it would have come out > given 10 chances.
|
