On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:19:04 -0800 (PST), thirty-six
<thirty-...@live.co.uk> wrote: >The following was a message not accepted through moderation of >uk.rec.cycling.moderated >I've re-submitted it there, rbt and now here.
Thank you for maximising the chances for people to point and laugh at your fatuous ideas. Mission accomplished, now please fuck off.
On 8 Nov, 11:46, "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chap...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:19:04 -0800 (PST), thirty-six
> <thirty-...@live.co.uk> wrote: > >The following was a message not accepted through moderation of > >uk.rec.cycling.moderated > >I've re-submitted it there, rbt and now here.
> Thank you for maximising the chances for people to point and laugh at > your fatuous ideas. Mission accomplished, now please fuck off.
I am actually not at all amazed by your response to this post -- oh not that you express a sentiment similar to mine to the poster -- but your way of doing it.
I have watched your posts on urcm and and other areas and I hardly recognise your style there . Purer than pure!
Ah but here on urc you revert to form. A stirrer , a wrestler and a deliberate baiter and creator of long irrelevant posts.
I have carefully watched your posts on several groups and see again, and again your profession of total innocence
In this case I see absolutely no need for you to say "f*ck off" -- it is intended to create a situation. I suggest that you use the same terminology on "urcm" and not on here!
You are a inveterate "stirrer" and I am totally in agreement with the assessment that Ian Smith made of you a couple of weeks ago.
You Post,
You shower the area with effluent,
and then you profess dismay when the same area is covered with that effluent and try to appear innocent and hurt by the endless responses which cover the whole group with the same dirt!
Oh I do believe that Judith, Nuxx and Matt B were/are a PIA but the main reason they were such a distressing presence was your unending, incessant feed ing of their responses.
I have seen your claims elsewhere that you were defending yourself against attacks by these people.
That is very far from the truth.
If anyone holds responsibility for the degradation of "urc" it is you --- and it is you ---- and it is you! And now you have the temerity to continue with your efforts on urc while you post on urcm posing an innocent
Right!
So it is very very rare that I express myself in basic language. I think it is the refuge of posters who are unable to form a proper and legible response to an argument or a discussion.
So here I go
hey "Just this Guy" why don't you just -- "go way" --oops --- sorry I meant "f*ck off". and if I ever meant anything I have said on here let me reinforce it why don't you "Go Away". You are a hugely disturbing influence which negates the little good sense that you make wrt cycling.
You are and have been for months a destructive element to urc and I suspect that many people have had enough of your endless vitriolic rhetoric on urc
I certainly have.
I resurrected several borderline case from my "sin bin" during this last couple of weeks and I thought long and hard about you!
hey --- congratulations you will be back there in just 48 hours!
A final comment.
I have written and rewritten this post several times.
It is vey clearly a personal "attack" on another unique individual of whom I have no knowledge other than that which I read on these very unimportant "newsgroups! Most of the time, when I get to this point, I just go away for a while and think it might get better when I return. but people like "Just this Guy" will only add to the process of destruction
So at then end of the day I can just go away and ignore all this fairly irrelevant "chatter" that goes on here and urcm ( I look there but will not post there for a while at least -- while the Cabal/Junta attacks a declining "Usenet" -- probably hastenting its imminent demise).
in the end i supose it is all more than a little unimportant
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:36:02 -0000, "Trevor A Panther"
<ta...@PSANTISPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote: >hey Guy --- "f*ck off".
*shrug* fair enough. I'm just expressing frustration at the forum shopping of thirty-six, aka Nick L Plate, aka Trevor. This is not the first time he's come along and played the wronged innocent.
On Nov 8, 3:48 pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chap...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> played the wronged innocent.
Tackling problems head-on seems to be a lost cause on the internet, in general. In dealing with your problems, have you used all fifteen stages of the Glupy-Chelobek Problem Resolution Method? http://www.mepis.org/node/6888 If it seems stuck, a wire coat-hanger, straightened and carefully inserted to fairly scratch the uterine lining, the end result being a severe infection leading to miscarriage, can bring about fabulous results, if applied early enough.
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:36:02 -0000, "Trevor A Panther" > <ta...@PSANTISPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>hey Guy --- "f*ck off".
> *shrug* fair enough. I'm just expressing frustration at the forum > shopping of thirty-six, aka Nick L Plate, aka Trevor. This is not the > first time he's come along and played the wronged innocent.
Trevor A Panther wrote: > "Just zis Guy, you know?" <guy.chap...@spamcop.net> wrote in message > news:bjbef59bmpnmlsrhmcflthcrikp28fgk2u@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:36:02 -0000, "Trevor A Panther" >> <ta...@PSANTISPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>> hey Guy --- "f*ck off". >> *shrug* fair enough. I'm just expressing frustration at the forum >> shopping of thirty-six, aka Nick L Plate, aka Trevor. This is not the >> first time he's come along and played the wronged innocent.
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:16:24 -0800 (PST), thirty-six
<thirty-...@live.co.uk> wrote: >Yeah, but, mines bigger than yours, and my brother's in this gang and >there's six of them, so THERE. You're a fool, Guy.
Probably I am a fool, but you are an idiot and I know which is worse.