The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet. Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: mdm <marcmi...@googlemail.com>Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 17:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 01:48
Subject: z8 opcodes
Hi,
to conform to the z-machine standard does a z8 interpreter have to
support z6-opcodes or (hopefully) only z-5 opcodes?
Marc
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: Dannii <curiousdan...@gmail.com>Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:37:26 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 02:37
Subject: Re: z8 opcodes
On Nov 9, 11:48 am, mdm <marcmi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > to conform to the z-machine standard does a z8 interpreter have to
> support z6-opcodes or (hopefully) only z-5 opcodes?
> Marc
addressing formula (so that it can be bigger.)
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: Andrew Plotkin <erkyr...@eblong.com>Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 03:36:02 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 03:36
Subject: Re: z8 opcodes
Here, Dannii <curiousdan ...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 9, 11:48 am, mdm <marcmi ...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > to conform to the z-machine standard does a z8 interpreter have to
> > support z6-opcodes or (hopefully) only z-5 opcodes?
> Basically version 8 is identical to version 5 except for a different
> addressing formula (so that it can be bigger.)
The Z6 opcodes are not present.
--Z
--
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: Andrew Plotkin <erkyr...@eblong.com>Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:31:21 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 02:31
Subject: Re: z8 opcodes
Here, mdm <marcmi ...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > to conform to the z-machine standard does a z8 interpreter have to
> support z6-opcodes or (hopefully) only z-5 opcodes?
Z6 opcodes do not exist.
--Z
--
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: Andrew Plotkin <erkyr...@eblong.com>Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:07:24 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 16:07
Subject: Re: z8 opcodes
Here, Andrew Plotkin <erkyr...@eblong.com> wrote:
> Here, mdm <marcmi ...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > to conform to the z-machine standard does a z8 interpreter have to
> > support z6-opcodes or (hopefully) only z-5 opcodes?
> Z8 is identical to Z5, except for the change in memory addressing. The
> Z6 opcodes do not exist.
(instead of, as it appears, lost for several hours).
--Z
--
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
From: mdm <marcmi...@googlemail.com>Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:30:49 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon 9 Nov 2009 19:30
Subject: Re: z8 opcodes
On Nov 9, 5:07 pm, Andrew Plotkin <erkyr...@eblong.com> wrote:
> Here, Andrew Plotkin <erkyr ...@eblong.com> wrote: > > Here, mdm <marcmi...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > to conform to the z-machine standard does a z8 interpreter have to
> > > support z6-opcodes or (hopefully) only z-5 opcodes?
> > Z8 is identical to Z5, except for the change in memory addressing. The
> > Z6 opcodes do not exist.
> Hey, double posting. Sorry. I was sure this one got lost forever
> (instead of, as it appears, lost for several hours).
> --Z
> --
> "And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
> *
You must Sign in before you can post messages. You do not have the permission required to post.
|
|
|
|
