|
|
Qilang |
Generally, I'm more tactful with people; but today I'm feeling less so
Thus I'm totally uninterested in
a. whether or whether you do not use Qi.
and thats about as far as this conversation goes.
Mark
On 29 Nov, 09:39, hars <h...@bik-gmbh.de> wrote:
> > * New license.
> You use of the term "open source" in your new license is misleading,
> | The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program
> See <http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd> or identically
> And btw, thanks for making my list of technologies I ought to know but
> Yours, Florian.
after a frenetic 48 hours.
b. whether my use of 'open source' conforms to the dictats of your
self-appointed group.
> On 27 Nov., 19:26, Mark Tarver <dr.mtar...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
> please stop it. One of the fundamental tenets of open source software
> is this:
> in a
> | specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the
> program
> | from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic
> research.
> <http://www.debian.org/social_contract.en.html>.
> don't have the time for shorter.