Message from discussion
How is the SDO development and when is it supposed to become stable?
Received: by 10.151.103.2 with SMTP id f2mr803976ybm.16.1226682927692;
Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <gcps-phpso...@m.gmane.org>
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si830378yxr.1.2008.11.14.09.15.26;
Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gcps-phpso...@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.2;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcps-phpso...@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gcps-phpso...@m.gmane.org
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1L12GR-0006Z4-6G
for phpsoa@googlegroups.com; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:15:23 +0000
Received: from blueice3n1.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.83])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <phpsoa@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:15:23 +0000
Received: from cem by blueice3n1.uk.ibm.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <phpsoa@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:15:23 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
From: Caroline Maynard <c...@php.net>
Subject: Re: How is the SDO development and when is it supposed to become
stable?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:15:12 +0000
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <gfkbmu$jo4$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <58c5ffd40811121147h44516ca2hd8e30a7fefa2d89e@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: blueice3n1.uk.ibm.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
In-Reply-To: <58c5ffd40811121147h44516ca2hd8e30a7fefa2d89e@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: news <n...@ger.gmane.org>
Bruno Reis wrote:
> I'm facing some design decisions on a new project now that puts me
> towards something like SDO, but being it an experimental extension,
> it's hard to bet on it. May anyone tell me please, how is the SDO
> development going and when is it supposed to become stable?
Bruno, I'm wondering if you really mean SDO here, or the entire SCA_SDO
package. The SDO extension >is< marked stable - perhaps a bit too stable
for some :-(. But if you want to use SCA, then that has not been marked
stable because the interfaces have sometimes changed from one release to
the next, and it seemed too soon to burden developers with mandatory
backward compatibility. Both parts are getting little active development
at present, but we do try to fix bugs.
|
