Message from discussion How is the SDO development and when is it supposed to become stable?

Received: by 10.90.32.14 with SMTP id f14mr2019443agf.27.1226839477161;
        Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:44:37 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <bruno.p.r...@gmail.com>
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 39si2496702yxd.2.2008.11.16.04.44.36;
        Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:44:36 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bruno.p.r...@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.132.251;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bruno.p.r...@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bruno.p.r...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d11so844549and.39
        for <phpsoa@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:44:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=tZT4hQrzVRAeoKeoOm26q5qvxK/SeGmNWsSJzHhFUrU=;
        b=e0vANDHo2wmbpjxy6ZgvaqV0i0xTzRZTiYbXikkd/Yl3ZenXXEu+SVKHVUCM2yRsQ+
         yv7y4+7c3FvyU5mTM2XNMkCbuDZhng5iGabCfampXt/rcdE5XwJl2VM7Dr0FVzyUw2g/
         7Pk98bP22EGX+za1tfWUmKFZtYXquxK9UOQD4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=eL9T644XMVa53M1NCSFUz6aNIxPaciMOV639xa3aS5M7Kha8C4Qrcxj6voy3sVOzTz
         zle4c0FIxUZ5TdeS4ROpLt+e7YODaVNXaqQ0ftSNv51Brp1ts8E5PQdfcu65iVfNVHRq
         D3Wg3YYY7DpE8g8J9rRgti17o37eNxzpG3ovM=
Received: by 10.100.142.4 with SMTP id p4mr1246234and.23.1226839475973;
        Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.3.5 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <58c5ffd40811160444j7970d29ta532dcc2493fd0b6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:44:35 -0300
From: "Bruno Reis" <bruno.p.r...@gmail.com>
To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [phpsoa] Re: How is the SDO development and when is it supposed to become stable?
In-Reply-To: <gfkbmu$jo...@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <58c5ffd40811121147h44516ca2hd8e30a7fefa2d...@mail.gmail.com>
	 <gfkbmu$jo...@ger.gmane.org>

Thanks Caroline,

This toll is what I was needing for my work. Congratulations for the
well done work until now. It is sure a good toll for the php comunity.

When was it marked stable?
Is there a good didatic tutorial or docs you would suggest?

Thks again,
Bruno

2008/11/14 Caroline Maynard <c...@php.net>:
>
> Bruno Reis wrote:
>
>> I'm facing some design decisions on a new project now that puts me
>> towards something like SDO, but being it an experimental extension,
>> it's hard to bet on it. May anyone tell me please, how is the SDO
>> development going and when is it supposed to become stable?
>
> Bruno, I'm wondering if you really mean SDO here, or the entire SCA_SDO
> package. The SDO extension >is< marked stable - perhaps a bit too stable
> for some :-(. But if you want to use SCA, then that has not been marked
> stable because the interfaces have sometimes changed from one release to
> the next, and it seemed too soon to burden developers with mandatory
> backward compatibility. Both parts are getting little active development
>  at present, but we do try to fix bugs.
>
>
> >
>