Message from discussion
Local SCA client access.
Received: by 10.142.173.8 with SMTP id v8mr599712wfe.11.1227114458224;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <bruno.p.r...@gmail.com>
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.158])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k32si4456673wah.1.2008.11.19.09.07.37;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:07:37 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bruno.p.r...@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.158 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.46.158;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bruno.p.r...@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.158 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bruno.p.r...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so31107ywr.58
for <phpsoa@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:07:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:mime-version:content-type;
bh=PksLxuQn3Jwk6XenCyWGnMky6uPNhqoF8G4Ruwkgeew=;
b=jeTkw8BctJLHmKZSJAhMWyDGlGmUmPk6nY3HI9yBkW3Cwa7aKbWhd5KLNOUZxbnsO0
x/PnnwslfdTynY/LizVFiLGQZsCd+otZ95gPUNJEmVYmZdqwIbbIt2dorNfXI6dJTMOF
vHu4fOg2dvFqO9OEk4PdNrIjXz0Rj2OoPqRdg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=Y4w/aVuoO/RqoIlHQCFjdgvHWkI/vG2PMMXn9OuXNToqwBt0sHmcHhcurlRyis3Jnz
0WI6PjMMcmN6ueoc9w/IQIgT7JnIol0A17uaJer4DJQxEksuNUuOkh/MnzfAjzncRPnQ
0wAh6bbyKuceRM/cHH7IBONr+/Y15dPuVZgf0=
Received: by 10.101.68.19 with SMTP id v19mr671679ank.62.1227114456227;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.3.5 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <58c5ffd40811190907w3c218552se64f14ec9371e9d0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:07:31 -0200
From: "Bruno Reis" <bruno.p.r...@gmail.com>
To: phpsoa@googlegroups.com
Subject: Local SCA client access.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_102628_7599529.1227114456225"
------=_Part_102628_7599529.1227114456225
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi there,
I was wondering about how a local SCA access happens. I run trough the IBM
tutorial where I set up a service and a client, running on the same machine.
It worked just fine, but I have not tested performance.
How is this operation compared to a normal method access?
Does this local access involves XML messaging, or the SCA recognize its on
the same server and do this access on another (maybe faster) way?
I will begin to build an application and I am thinking about using SCA to
organize it in a "service oriented" way. But I dont plan to use a rich
client capable of doing all the job on the client, so I will have a
middleware layer that will act as a controller either.
Do you think this may be an overhead to use SCA this way, instead of
accessing this service layer with normal php code?
------=_Part_102628_7599529.1227114456225
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi there, <br><br>I was wondering about how a local SCA access happens. I run trough the IBM tutorial where I set up a service and a client, running on the same machine. <br>It worked just fine, but I have not tested performance. <br>
How is this operation compared to a normal method access? <br>Does this local access involves XML messaging, or the SCA recognize its on the same server and do this access on another (maybe faster) way?<br><br>I will begin to build an application and I am thinking about using SCA to organize it in a "service oriented" way. But I dont plan to use a rich client capable of doing all the job on the client, so I will have a middleware layer that will act as a controller either. <br>
<br>Do you think this may be an overhead to use SCA this way, instead of accessing this service layer with normal php code?<br>
------=_Part_102628_7599529.1227114456225--
|
