Methods Documentation in WSDL - phpsoa

Message from discussion Methods Documentation in WSDL

Silvano Girardi Jr

More options 25 Apr, 17:06

From: "Silvano Girardi Jr" <silvan...@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:06:24 -0300

Local: Fri 25 Apr 2008 17:06

Subject: Re: [phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward | Print | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message | Find messages by this author
  

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard <c...@php.net> wrote:

> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard <c...@php.net> wrote:

> >> Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:

> >>> is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
> >>> <documentation></documentation> in the WSDL based on the method's
> >>> description in the doc block?
> >> Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any
> volunteers?

> > I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my
> spare
> > time.

> > I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going
> to
> > do this.
> > Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put
> > here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you
> guys
> > handle these things).

> > Anyway, I am a volunteer :)

> > Silvano

> Great :-)
> Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at
> http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you have
> a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.

Ok I just did it: http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775

Need your thoughts here.

1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in the
request above), or only for methods?
2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle this?

Silvano

Reply to author Forward