Message from discussion email threat

From: Mall...@aol.com
Subject: Re: email threat
Date: 1999/04/06
Message-ID: <ea961e85.243acec5@aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 463096788
Original-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 22:43:17 EDT
Distribution: world
Approved: n...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Sender: r...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
Reply-To: Mall...@aol.com
Newsgroups: muc.lists.debian.user
Original-Newsgroups: muc.lists.debian.user

I have two things to say about this, or maybe three:

1) Am I the only one that is tired of hearing about the bickering between 
these two? and on a Debian-user list? and on a public mailing list? 

2) If the authorities have been notified - fine, leave us out of it.

3) Don't make judgements until you know the whole story (and, no, I don't).  
A clip here, a snippet there, an you can make anyone believe anything you 
want them to.

-Jay

In a message dated Mon, 5 Apr 1999  7:16:58 PM Eastern Daylight Time, thomas 
lakofski <to...@88.net> writes:

> On 5 Apr 1999 br...@perens.com wrote:
> 
> [ESR wrote:]
> 
> > > Damn straight I took it personally.  And if you ever again behave like
> > > that kind of disruptive asshole in public, insult me, and jeopardize
> > > the interests of our entire tribe, I'll take it just as personally --
> > > and I will find a way to make you regret it.  Watch your step.
> 
> I think that most people in the Linux community will find this behaviour
> objectionable in the extreme.  If ESR wanted to rally people round in his
> defense ('understand my job', etc.), he's just taken one of his many
> firearms and shot himself in the foot.
> 
> It's fairly obvious who is 'behav[ing] like [a] disruptive asshole,' and
> 'jeopardiz[ing] the interests of our entire tribe.'
> 



-- 
Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org < /dev/null