| |
mozilla.dev.accessibility |
The roles and properties are not radically More specifically, IBM was part of the original Microsoft planned for companies to write adapters - Aaron > --
different between UIA and IAccessible2/AT-SPI, but
unfortunately all accessibility API's have some
differences in those areas.
UIA review process, and while use of roles is not
exactly the same as in AT-SPI and IAccessible2, we
believe a mapping is possible. The review was
under NDA so we can't discuss the details.
to UIA. We would be happy to work with Microsoft
to support a cohesion in the future if needed. We
would like the work to be done in an open
standards venue.
> How radically different are the roles exposed by UI Automation and
> IAccessible2? Would it be possible/useful to create some sort of mapping
> between them? (Smaller application developers may baulk at developing
> applications that expose to multiple accessibility frameworks.)
> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis