<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>microsoft.public.sqlserver.server Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server</link>
  <description>Microsoft SQL Server newsgroup.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Why Can&#39;t SSMS Script Data???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/b781bacc4d6b7125/1393451697b88d58?show_docid=1393451697b88d58</link>
  <description>
  SSMS in SQL Server 2008 supports scripting data. For SQL Server 2005 you can use the Database Publishing wizard: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/12/22/recipe-deploying-a-sql-database-to-a-remote-hosting-environment-part-1.aspx&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=56E5B1C5-BF17-42E0-A410-371A838E570A&amp;displaylang=en&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/b781bacc4d6b7125/1393451697b88d58?show_docid=1393451697b88d58</guid>
  <author>
  pla...@sqlstudio.com
  (Plamen Ratchev)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2009 05:40:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Forensics - SQL Server 2005 Database Mysteriously Disappeared</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/72360437e3307e36/67cddaf54bbae25a?show_docid=67cddaf54bbae25a</link>
  <description>
  Where can I find the sql server error log? What would be most convienient is &lt;br&gt; a transaction log of all sql statements made that i can select against and &lt;br&gt; find a drop database or something similar. &lt;br&gt; -M
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/72360437e3307e36/67cddaf54bbae25a?show_docid=67cddaf54bbae25a</guid>
  <author>
  markbr...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (mark brito)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2009 05:20:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Forensics - SQL Server 2005 Database Mysteriously Disappeared</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/72360437e3307e36/1ccc935e6ddef0da?show_docid=1ccc935e6ddef0da</link>
  <description>
  I don&#39;t see any trc files.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/72360437e3307e36/1ccc935e6ddef0da?show_docid=1ccc935e6ddef0da</guid>
  <author>
  markbr...@discussions.microsoft.com
  (mark brito)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2009 05:18:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Why Can&#39;t SSMS Script Data???</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/b781bacc4d6b7125/c97e7c082fb28fd5?show_docid=c97e7c082fb28fd5</link>
  <description>
  I just can&#39;t believe this. Please tell me I&#39;m missing something obvious. &lt;br&gt; I need to copy a local database to a GoDaddy hosting account (yeah, yeah, I &lt;br&gt; know). GoDaddy only supports restoring BAK files that were generated from &lt;br&gt; the GoDaddy site, so I can&#39;t back it up on my computer and then restore to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/b781bacc4d6b7125/c97e7c082fb28fd5?show_docid=c97e7c082fb28fd5</guid>
  <author>
  jw...@softcircuits.com
  (Jonathan Wood)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2009 03:33:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Moving a Database to a new Server</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/1c4814472a844eae/8de236a08b76a45b?show_docid=8de236a08b76a45b</link>
  <description>
  Thanks for the link. I had been looking for a document similar to &lt;br&gt; that but for some reason couldn&#39;t find it. &lt;br&gt; Since I had to touch all of the client boxes anyway, I ended up &lt;br&gt; dropping a hosts file with the pointer instead of putting it on the &lt;br&gt; DNS server. For some reason it felt more absolute that way. I&#39;ll
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/1c4814472a844eae/8de236a08b76a45b?show_docid=8de236a08b76a45b</guid>
  <author>
  andy.lisow...@gmail.com
  (Carnage)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:02:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Collation settings</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/aa72ce6ad7ee320f/ce1e57d5f6e1e6a6?show_docid=ce1e57d5f6e1e6a6</link>
  <description>
  As Jeroen say, not all do. Here is an authentic output: &lt;br&gt; +» ls &lt;br&gt; ålder äldre arvode autoreply.pl* autoreserv.txt &lt;br&gt; auto-se.pl* bin/ brev/ crontab.save disapproved &lt;br&gt; emacs/ flimsy.pl forward.test lib/ Maildir/ &lt;br&gt; mbox mbox.save mbox.tmp.4473 nail-11.25/ News/
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/aa72ce6ad7ee320f/ce1e57d5f6e1e6a6?show_docid=ce1e57d5f6e1e6a6</guid>
  <author>
  esq...@sommarskog.se
  (Erland Sommarskog)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:33:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: SQL Server Output Buffer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/ddc286144c59b731/e28987c660407980?show_docid=e28987c660407980</link>
  <description>
  Are you logically separating the statements with ;&#39;s and placing GO at the &lt;br&gt; end of logical blocks? &lt;br&gt; Beyond that, you would have to build everything into a procedure and add &lt;br&gt; error checking (see @@ERROR, TRY &amp;amp; CATCH).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/ddc286144c59b731/e28987c660407980?show_docid=e28987c660407980</guid>
  <author>
  s...@nospam.org
  (Jay)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:00:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Collation settings</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/aa72ce6ad7ee320f/f3fc450d6bbd72e9?show_docid=f3fc450d6bbd72e9</link>
  <description>
  Jay wrote: &lt;br&gt; Oh dear, I feel another enormous post coming up. But I&#39;ll keep it short this &lt;br&gt; time. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Unix&amp;quot; is a very broad moniker that could apply to just about anything, but &lt;br&gt; if (as I&#39;m thinking) you mean that file systems mostly used by Unix &lt;br&gt; operating systems tend to be case- and accent-sensitive, then yes.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/aa72ce6ad7ee320f/f3fc450d6bbd72e9?show_docid=f3fc450d6bbd72e9</guid>
  <author>
  jmost...@xs4all.nl
  (Jeroen Mostert)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:36:17 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: SQL Server Output Buffer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/ddc286144c59b731/3a172dee07dfec09?show_docid=3a172dee07dfec09</link>
  <description>
  I think the KB article is applicable only to client applications that don&#39;t &lt;br&gt; consume all of the results generated by the script. SSMS should consume &lt;br&gt; all of the results of the script. &lt;br&gt; As I posted in your &amp;quot;Transactional Processing&amp;quot; thread, you might running &lt;br&gt; Profiler of SQL statement starting and completed events. That will show
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/ddc286144c59b731/3a172dee07dfec09?show_docid=3a172dee07dfec09</guid>
  <author>
  guzma...@nospam-online.sbcglobal.net
  (Dan Guzman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:55:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Transactional Processing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/a90b25bbd558dc23/046c785e8271db2e?show_docid=046c785e8271db2e</link>
  <description>
  I see you started a new thread in this group (&amp;quot;SQL Server Output Buffer&amp;quot;). &lt;br&gt; Please don&#39;t start independent discussions on the same topic as that causes &lt;br&gt; duplicate effort for all involved. If you feel a new thread is warranted, &lt;br&gt; at least reference the initial post when you start the new thread so that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/a90b25bbd558dc23/046c785e8271db2e?show_docid=046c785e8271db2e</guid>
  <author>
  guzma...@nospam-online.sbcglobal.net
  (Dan Guzman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:51:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Moving a Database to a new Server</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/1c4814472a844eae/56cdf657d8db64b1?show_docid=56cdf657d8db64b1</link>
  <description>
  Hi &lt;br&gt; I think what you are doing should work, and rather than remove the pointer &lt;br&gt; for the oldname then it could be left as a safety net. &lt;br&gt; You need to watch out for anything that references the server by IP. &lt;br&gt; If you go through the route of renaming a server after you have installed &lt;br&gt; SQL Server then you need to check for this problem
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/1c4814472a844eae/56cdf657d8db64b1?show_docid=56cdf657d8db64b1</guid>
  <author>
  jbellnewspo...@hotmail.com
  (John Bell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:30:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Collation settings</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/aa72ce6ad7ee320f/91fa3ce7fe04bfcc?show_docid=91fa3ce7fe04bfcc</link>
  <description>
  OK, I got it. Thanks. &lt;br&gt; It also clears something up that has bugged me for a while: Unix clearly &lt;br&gt; uses a binary collation. &lt;br&gt; Thanks, &lt;br&gt; Jay
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/aa72ce6ad7ee320f/91fa3ce7fe04bfcc?show_docid=91fa3ce7fe04bfcc</guid>
  <author>
  s...@nospam.org
  (Jay)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:28:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: SQL Server Output Buffer</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/ddc286144c59b731/531daefdb91b73ce?show_docid=531daefdb91b73ce</link>
  <description>
  There is too little information to say what is wrong, but whatever, the &lt;br&gt; output buffer has nothing to do with it. &lt;br&gt; I can think of two explanations to your problem: &lt;br&gt; 1) There are flaws in the script, for instance comments, that prevents &lt;br&gt; the statement to be run. &lt;br&gt; 2) Your diagnosis that the statements did not run is in correct.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/ddc286144c59b731/531daefdb91b73ce?show_docid=531daefdb91b73ce</guid>
  <author>
  esq...@sommarskog.se
  (Erland Sommarskog)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:09:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Forensics - SQL Server 2005 Database Mysteriously Disappeared</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/72360437e3307e36/b39e047a36d73867?show_docid=b39e047a36d73867</link>
  <description>
  They wouldn&#39;t be named after the database as they cover the entire instance. &lt;br&gt; But if this is 2005 there should be 5 files with a .trc extension in the LOG &lt;br&gt; folder under that instance.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/72360437e3307e36/b39e047a36d73867?show_docid=b39e047a36d73867</guid>
  <author>
  sqlmvpnooos...@shadhawk.com
  (Andrew J. Kelly)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:07:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Nested Partitions?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/a2da190b0111e7e7/86481be6c206fd53?show_docid=86481be6c206fd53</link>
  <description>
  I doubt partitioning (table or view) is the right solution to address query &lt;br&gt; and index tuning. As Russ and Kalen mentioned, the optimizer ought to be &lt;br&gt; able to generate a decent plan in most cases as long as appropriate indexes &lt;br&gt; are available and stats are up-to-date. I seldom need to resort to index
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.server/browse_frm/thread/a2da190b0111e7e7/86481be6c206fd53?show_docid=86481be6c206fd53</guid>
  <author>
  guzma...@nospam-online.sbcglobal.net
  (Dan Guzman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:49:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
