<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming</id>
  <title type="text">microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Microsoft SQL Server newsgroup.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-08T12:09:16Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mike23</name>
  <email>_no_s...@_no_spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T12:09:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/5cb508bbab32292e?show_docid=5cb508bbab32292e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/5cb508bbab32292e?show_docid=5cb508bbab32292e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Transaction load</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks. I&#39;m actually using the &amp;quot;SqlBulkCopy&amp;quot; class (assuming you&#39;re familiar &lt;br&gt; with .NET) and this presumably wraps BULK INSERT (still researching things). &lt;br&gt; I also took a quick look at ROWS_PER_BATCH and this may prove useful (thanks &lt;br&gt; for pointing this out). If possible however, I&#39;d like to insert all data in
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Uri Dimant</name>
  <email>u...@iscar.co.il</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T10:52:53Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/c75d2b5a7d4f7d81?show_docid=c75d2b5a7d4f7d81</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/c75d2b5a7d4f7d81?show_docid=c75d2b5a7d4f7d81"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Transaction load</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi &lt;br&gt; As Andrew said to separate LOG and DATA files must be e first step &lt;br&gt; Have you considered using SSIS Package to insert the data from the files , &lt;br&gt; it hs very nice feature named &#39;fast load&#39;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tony Rogerson</name>
  <email>tonyroger...@torver.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T08:55:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/ebfd97c6f67f99ff?show_docid=ebfd97c6f67f99ff</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/ebfd97c6f67f99ff?show_docid=ebfd97c6f67f99ff"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Join query returns to many rows</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Precisely why you should never code using the original ansi 89 style and use &lt;br&gt; infix instead... &lt;br&gt; Never code like this... &lt;br&gt; FROM {tbl} as a, {tbl} as b &lt;br&gt; WHERE a.tblkey = b.tblkey &lt;br&gt; AND a.postertype = &#39;opinionated&#39; &lt;br&gt; AND a.postername = &#39;--celko--&#39; &lt;br&gt; Instead you should write like the majority of other folk do....
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tony Rogerson</name>
  <email>tonyroger...@torver.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T08:51:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/4301142fd518cb6a?show_docid=4301142fd518cb6a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/4301142fd518cb6a?show_docid=4301142fd518cb6a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Running value but with a string</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Wrong - the standards a small subset of the product language available &lt;br&gt; within MICROSOFT SQL SERVER. &lt;br&gt; Wrong again - we&#39;ve already been through this one; there are very few items &lt;br&gt; of syntax that have been deprecated - legacy code written on SQL Server 6.5 &lt;br&gt; still works on SQL Server 2008 - that allows business to migrate versions of
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rahul</name>
  <email>verma.car...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T07:23:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/d6b4c85859bb244f/3b50b09ccd43b6f8?show_docid=3b50b09ccd43b6f8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/d6b4c85859bb244f/3b50b09ccd43b6f8?show_docid=3b50b09ccd43b6f8"/>
  <title type="text">Sql Server on VMWare</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Can anybody give me some right direction or usefull link &lt;br&gt; 1. About VMware environment &lt;br&gt; 2. How to Install and configure Sql Server 2005 on VMware. &lt;br&gt; 3. Is there any performance change on VMware. &lt;br&gt; Regards &lt;br&gt; Rahul
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dave</name>
  <email>djohanns...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T01:32:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/eee56221ef1216db/3a891b2455a3144e?show_docid=3a891b2455a3144e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/eee56221ef1216db/3a891b2455a3144e?show_docid=3a891b2455a3144e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: SSIS hitting FK violation - need to ignore the error rows - have package succeed</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  oh thanks, i&#39;ll consider this also. both pieces of info where very &lt;br&gt; helpful!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>--CELKO--</name>
  <email>jcelko...@earthlink.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T00:29:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/58c91f45f6418717?show_docid=58c91f45f6418717</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9362aa06bd5ec1aa/58c91f45f6418717?show_docid=58c91f45f6418717"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Running value but with a string</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You narrow your solutions by writing in dialect; you increase their &lt;br&gt; scope, maintainability and robustness by sticking to Standards. &lt;br&gt; Having something that runs in only one release of one version of one &lt;br&gt; SQL is not a good thing. &lt;br&gt; But strong dialect code gives you job security. Even better, write &lt;br&gt; your code in an unsupported version that only you know.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>--CELKO--</name>
  <email>jcelko...@earthlink.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T00:10:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/f4947f2b07f0d00b?show_docid=f4947f2b07f0d00b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/9a08c14b014622fa/f4947f2b07f0d00b?show_docid=f4947f2b07f0d00b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Join query returns to many rows</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  There are two forms of the SELECT [ALL | DISTINCT]; the SELECT ALL &lt;br&gt; keeps duplicate rows and the SELECT DISTINCT removes redundant &lt;br&gt; duplicate rows, leaving one copy. SELECT by itself is a shorthand for &lt;br&gt; SELECT ALL. You will find these keywords used in other parts of SQL &lt;br&gt; for this sort of thing. &lt;br&gt; As a generalization, a SELECT DISTINCT is a symptom of a bad query
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Andrew J. Kelly</name>
  <email>sqlmvpnooos...@shadhawk.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T23:17:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/291ee23e4abaf623?show_docid=291ee23e4abaf623</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/291ee23e4abaf623?show_docid=291ee23e4abaf623"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Transaction load</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well how much something like this will affect the performance of the server &lt;br&gt; depends on many factors and is difficult to say without knowing much more &lt;br&gt; about it. But assuming you have properly configured hardware and place the &lt;br&gt; log files on their own Raid 1 or raid 10 it should not be a real problem.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Farmer</name>
  <email>some...@somewhere.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T22:22:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/1242236343c776b0?show_docid=1242236343c776b0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/141b61d6627f0e18/1242236343c776b0?show_docid=1242236343c776b0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Transaction load</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I asssumed you were talking about binary or text files. &lt;br&gt; You seem to talk about BCP/BULK INSERT type of load. Look at these commands &lt;br&gt; in details. &lt;br&gt; Check ROWS_PER_BATCH value; it might help you.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>--CELKO--</name>
  <email>jcelko...@earthlink.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T21:24:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/7054e4024556159b?show_docid=7054e4024556159b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/7054e4024556159b?show_docid=7054e4024556159b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Database Table Design</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I will guess that you are getting stuck on the temporal aspect of the &lt;br&gt; model. &lt;br&gt; Since Computers and users are entities, you will need a table for each &lt;br&gt; of them. Computer Sessions will reference a user, a computer and a &lt;br&gt; start-end time pair for usage. UserGroups are a relationship among &lt;br&gt; users, so that table will have a group id, reference to the users and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jama</name>
  <email>j...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T21:21:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/005ab9bcac5cef66?show_docid=005ab9bcac5cef66</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/005ab9bcac5cef66?show_docid=005ab9bcac5cef66"/>
  <title type="text">RE: Database Table Design</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Yes, A user can be assigned to one or more computers but a computer can be &lt;br&gt; assigned to one user at a time. No relationship between a group and a &lt;br&gt; computer as I know but you can suggest me one if possible. &lt;br&gt; Here is more. &lt;br&gt; We open an account with a computer supplier to each of our groups{fiction &lt;br&gt; writers, technology writer etc}. The supplier assigns a number to each group.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>John Bell</name>
  <email>jbellnewspo...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T20:45:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/53c80a04a9fe2bdb/e9c6dc1029deb91c?show_docid=e9c6dc1029deb91c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/53c80a04a9fe2bdb/e9c6dc1029deb91c?show_docid=e9c6dc1029deb91c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Modify statement to run sp_executesql</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  To expand on this, when you need a quote in a string it has to be escaped &lt;br&gt; with another single quote. &lt;br&gt; John
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Augustin Prasanna</name>
  <email>augustinprasa...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T20:33:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/878470f0a35d3722?show_docid=878470f0a35d3722</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/4ed7ef498b337e98/878470f0a35d3722?show_docid=878470f0a35d3722"/>
  <title type="text">RE: Database Table Design</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Can the user use multiple computers when he is tagged to one specific group? &lt;br&gt; Any relation between group and computer?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will</name>
  <email>w...@crazy-pug.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T20:33:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/f0f454cb88605607/3565886d4005dd1c?show_docid=3565886d4005dd1c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming/browse_thread/thread/f0f454cb88605607/3565886d4005dd1c?show_docid=3565886d4005dd1c"/>
  <title type="text">Free Tools for SQL Server - SQLsoft.co.uk</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi All, &lt;br&gt; We&#39;ve written a number of (I think!) handy tools over the past few &lt;br&gt; months which are available from here: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.sqlsoft.co.uk/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Newly released is SQLscripta, which both searches _and_ scripts &lt;br&gt; sprocs, functions, views and triggers, with searches being performed &lt;br&gt; across multiple databases - it&#39;s quick and makes a great alternative
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
