<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework</id>
  <title type="text">microsoft.public.dotnet.framework Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Microsoft .NET technology newsgroup.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="microsoft.public.dotnet.framework feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-22T13:18:52Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Vadym Stetsiak</name>
  <email>vadm...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T13:18:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/b4984f08237364ab/862efd419dbc58a9?show_docid=862efd419dbc58a9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/b4984f08237364ab/862efd419dbc58a9?show_docid=862efd419dbc58a9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: MC++ or WIN32/C ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello, Angshuman &lt;br&gt; If ported code will interact much with unmanaged code (call C API) &lt;br&gt; Then it can be better to use Managed C++ &lt;br&gt; To give more presice advice it will be better to know more details about &lt;br&gt; that ported code: what code it will interact with; it is possible to do all &lt;br&gt; the stuff in the managed way etc.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>angshuman</name>
  <email>angshuman.agar...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T08:51:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/b4984f08237364ab/0ad072bc557bcdf6?show_docid=0ad072bc557bcdf6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/b4984f08237364ab/0ad072bc557bcdf6?show_docid=0ad072bc557bcdf6"/>
  <title type="text">MC++ or WIN32/C ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I want to port the Solaris 5.8 C-Code (Mixed Endian Code) to Windows &lt;br&gt; x64/ &lt;br&gt; x86 platform for a .Net project. What is the best approach to &lt;br&gt; accomplish this ? &lt;br&gt; 1. Should I first port to WIN32/C (using BIT shifting for enadianness) &lt;br&gt; and then introduce a PInvoke layer ? &lt;br&gt; OR &lt;br&gt; 2. Should I use Managed C++ so that I directly get the support for
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Duniho</name>
  <email>no.peted.s...@no.nwlink.spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-22T00:28:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/5b7e420581b24df5?show_docid=5b7e420581b24df5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/5b7e420581b24df5?show_docid=5b7e420581b24df5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  YOU may want to make sure of that. Please feel free to if you like. &lt;br&gt; But I have no need or desire to, and telling me that _I_ need to do that &lt;br&gt; is simply incorrect. &lt;br&gt; The point of my test is to try to reproduce the problem the OP is &lt;br&gt; having. Not to prove or disprove the plausibility of some theory. &lt;br&gt; If you make an assumption about the cause of the problem, and then
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Goran Sliskovic</name>
  <email>gslis...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T23:46:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/2b72a4a333db5e40?show_docid=2b72a4a333db5e40</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/2b72a4a333db5e40?show_docid=2b72a4a333db5e40"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You can verify that the problem is in DNS by using network protocol analyzer &lt;br&gt; such as wireshark (free). &lt;br&gt; Most likely it is the problem with DNS. Try to resolve name in command &lt;br&gt; prompt using nslookup and see what happens. I guess it will block for some &lt;br&gt; time on your system, it doesn&#39;t on my. &lt;br&gt; Your ideas will probably work.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Goran Sliskovic</name>
  <email>gslis...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T23:35:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/bc0f277492a2b5b5?show_docid=bc0f277492a2b5b5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/bc0f277492a2b5b5?show_docid=bc0f277492a2b5b5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ... &lt;br&gt; We have first to make sure that delay in DNS resolution causes the problem. &lt;br&gt; You are not going to reproduce that if you DNS server is properly &lt;br&gt; configured. &lt;br&gt; Goran
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Duniho</name>
  <email>no.peted.s...@no.nwlink.spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T21:12:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/e8f5d28d862c6307?show_docid=e8f5d28d862c6307</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/e8f5d28d862c6307?show_docid=e8f5d28d862c6307"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Have you tried it in the .NET 4.0 beta? Maybe it has been fixed, finally. &lt;br&gt; There is, of course, the issue that just because Durgaprasad Gorti &lt;br&gt; considered it an important issue in 2006, that doesn&#39;t mean he even &lt;br&gt; still works in that group, never mind still considers it important. &lt;br&gt; A much better way to state your case and provide for a way to track
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Duniho</name>
  <email>no.peted.s...@no.nwlink.spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T21:04:52Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/23044283ed0545a4?show_docid=23044283ed0545a4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/23044283ed0545a4?show_docid=23044283ed0545a4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  No. I have to test using the same scenario that the OP is using. The &lt;br&gt; point is to try to achieve results comparable to his, not necessarily to &lt;br&gt; find _another way_ to force a delay in DNS resolution. &lt;br&gt; Pete
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Malcolm Hall</name>
  <email>malcolm.h...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T20:56:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/5ff43375c63f172e?show_docid=5ff43375c63f172e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/5ff43375c63f172e?show_docid=5ff43375c63f172e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Durgaprasad Gorti @ &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/netfxnetcom/thread/2cb74a7e-6e8f-4d05-b86a-2401df5d2ed3/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;You are absolutely correct. If you call the BeginGetResponse(), today &lt;br&gt; we block until the &lt;br&gt; name resolution happens. This is result of an unfortunate series of &lt;br&gt; issues we had to &lt;br&gt; workthrough in the initial release and we were locked into backward
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Malcolm Hall</name>
  <email>malcolm.h...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T20:34:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/3afdbdb1faaf3456?show_docid=3afdbdb1faaf3456</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/3afdbdb1faaf3456?show_docid=3afdbdb1faaf3456"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Now we know the method causing the problem I found this post on the &lt;br&gt; topic: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1232139/webrequest-begingetresponse-is-taking-too-much-time-when-the-url-is-invalid&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Malcolm Hall</name>
  <email>malcolm.h...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T20:25:11Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/b3c5a9d8b0ac50c5?show_docid=b3c5a9d8b0ac50c5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/b3c5a9d8b0ac50c5?show_docid=b3c5a9d8b0ac50c5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The hang happens at BeginGetRequestStream. It must be my ISP cause I &lt;br&gt; had some other people try the ping test and theirs fails almost &lt;br&gt; instantly like you. I thought the whole point of the async methods is &lt;br&gt; to make it easier to have a responsive UI and not have the complexity &lt;br&gt; of creating threads but that all goes out the window beacuse of this
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Goran Sliskovic</name>
  <email>gslis...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T19:41:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/6f4825ddb2a42793?show_docid=6f4825ddb2a42793</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/6f4825ddb2a42793?show_docid=6f4825ddb2a42793"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  ... &lt;br&gt; ... &lt;br&gt; You have to test probably with non-existant DNS server, not non-existant &lt;br&gt; domain. DNS servers are very fast in getting the IP from name. That means &lt;br&gt; that they are also fast in finding the domains that do not exist. ;) &lt;br&gt; Try to set a DNS server to a non-existant IP address in your network. Don&#39;t
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Duniho</name>
  <email>no.peted.s...@no.nwlink.spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T19:10:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/e0727ee86cf9f53b?show_docid=e0727ee86cf9f53b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/e0727ee86cf9f53b?show_docid=e0727ee86cf9f53b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Well, like I said, I was unable to reproduce the problem. In fact, I &lt;br&gt; did the same kind of timing modification to the code example when I &lt;br&gt; original tested it, and while the call to UploadStringAsync() took &lt;br&gt; almost all of the total execution time, it was generally less than 100ms &lt;br&gt; to return. &lt;br&gt; Well, given that it&#39;s controlled by whether the domain is valid or not,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Malcolm Hall</name>
  <email>malcolm.h...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T13:27:49Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/fa99709d42a1341f?show_docid=fa99709d42a1341f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/5612cabc03b9b7b5/fa99709d42a1341f?show_docid=fa99709d42a1341f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: WebClient UploadStringAsync hangs</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I too didn&#39;t see anything obvious in Reflector. I added current time &lt;br&gt; debug output before and after the line: &lt;br&gt; 21/11/2009 13:19:55 &lt;br&gt; 21/11/2009 13:20:07 &lt;br&gt; As you can see its taking 12 seconds to complete the call to &lt;br&gt; UploadStringAsync. This blocks the UI thread and causes (Not &lt;br&gt; responding) to appear in the Form&#39;s title. This is more or less the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>LogicNP</name>
  <email>hima...@ssware.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T05:33:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/abbd9942a45771c9/4ed70cbcebf6f673?show_docid=4ed70cbcebf6f673</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/abbd9942a45771c9/4ed70cbcebf6f673?show_docid=4ed70cbcebf6f673"/>
  <title type="text">RE: Need success stories / tool info. reg. implementing Licensing for WinForms !</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  CryptoLicensing ( &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ssware.com/cryptolicensing/cryptolicensing_net.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; ) may fit your needs: &lt;br&gt; 1. Supports trial/eval licenses. &lt;br&gt; 2. Even if customer reinstalls, the original license is used and if its expired, the app won&#39;t work. &lt;br&gt; 3. You can deploy your app with a pre-generate trial license of say 30 days.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Family Tree Mike</name>
  <email>familytreem...@discussions.microsoft.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T17:09:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/2af66b92bee1de8e/b31232fe6d9ce62a?show_docid=b31232fe6d9ce62a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework/browse_thread/thread/2af66b92bee1de8e/b31232fe6d9ce62a?show_docid=b31232fe6d9ce62a"/>
  <title type="text">RE: How to tell what version of framework is installed</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;mp&amp;quot; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Mark, &lt;br&gt; Adding to what Paul said, .Net is never remotely installed for your use. &lt;br&gt; .Net is installed locally. You may have .Net on a server to run ASP.Net &lt;br&gt; websites however. &lt;br&gt; If you are new to programming in .Net, then you will need to also identify &lt;br&gt; the development platform. .Net 1.1 -&amp;gt; Visual Studio 2003, .Net 2.0 -&amp;gt; Visual
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
