<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr</link>
  <description>Microsoft .NET technology newsgroup.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>.NET Runtime 2.0 Error Reporting, Event ID 5000 - Cannot see exception details in Windows Log</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/e31b529084b82d0c/b83fb18e3a85a4c7?show_docid=b83fb18e3a85a4c7</link>
  <description>
  Probably you need to see the exception details. Check comment at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://malcan.com/EN/Lists/Tips%20and%20tricks/DispForm.aspx?ID=18&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; This problem occurs because the default policy for unhandled exceptions has &lt;br&gt; 20-kwi-08 &lt;br&gt; This problem occurs because the default policy for unhandled exceptions has &lt;br&gt; changed in the .NET Framework 2.0. By default, the policy for unhandled
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/e31b529084b82d0c/b83fb18e3a85a4c7?show_docid=b83fb18e3a85a4c7</guid>
  <author>
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2009 10:59:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>a brand new query tool is out on beta, we need feedback, so you get a free copy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/22fc5b3dd354430b/32b7ee13ac222657?show_docid=32b7ee13ac222657</link>
  <description>
  We at Nob Hill Software are working on a new query tool: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.nobhillsoft.com/MarieAlix.aspx?HeardVia=ptut&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; You can read all about it on the above web page, but basically, its a &lt;br&gt; very ambitious project to create what we call &#39;the query tool to end &lt;br&gt; all query tools&#39;: everything you ever wanted, desired, dreamed about
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/22fc5b3dd354430b/32b7ee13ac222657?show_docid=32b7ee13ac222657</guid>
  <author>
  m...@nobhillsoft.com
  (Mia)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 16:10:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Looking for an event before threads exit</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/ba759faca27e5e91/42b49c32fc9cb121?show_docid=42b49c32fc9cb121</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m looking for a CLR event (or hook) that allows running .NET code on that &lt;br&gt; same thread before it terminates. This hook should work for both &amp;quot;new &lt;br&gt; Thread()&amp;quot; and also threads from thread pools. &lt;br&gt; The code must run on the thread itself (and not on the Finalizer thread). &lt;br&gt; Such low level hook exists in native code (DllMain), however that code runs
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/ba759faca27e5e91/42b49c32fc9cb121?show_docid=42b49c32fc9cb121</guid>
  <author>
  itaifren...@live.com
  (Itai Frenkel)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 14:32:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Go-like duck typing interfacing</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/83c4adef084169b9/210fa85dee4dfe2f?show_docid=210fa85dee4dfe2f</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I just stumbled across the &amp;quot;Go&amp;quot; language from google. Especially, I &lt;br&gt; like the duck-typing approach to interfaces. &lt;br&gt; Now my question: Is it even possible to implement such static duck &lt;br&gt; typing using the CLR? &lt;br&gt; Managed C++ templates seem to look similary, but they work by the &lt;br&gt; compiler generating the code for the all uses, so the CLR just sees
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/83c4adef084169b9/210fa85dee4dfe2f?show_docid=210fa85dee4dfe2f</guid>
  <author>
  leafnode.use-...@schabi.de
  (Markus Schaber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - solved!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/f970d1d1b19bd3cd?show_docid=f970d1d1b19bd3cd</link>
  <description>
  Ok, yeah, it&#39;s not that xcopy *can&#39;t* work with C++/CLI apps, it&#39;s that the &lt;br&gt; normal steps (put DLLs in the application directory) don&#39;t work. You have &lt;br&gt; to jump through hoops.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/f970d1d1b19bd3cd?show_docid=f970d1d1b19bd3cd</guid>
  <author>
  bvo...@newsgroup.nospam
  (Ben Voigt [C++ MVP])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2009 16:44:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - solved!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/25a19b1acca61629?show_docid=25a19b1acca61629</link>
  <description>
  Hooray! &lt;br&gt; Problem solved! The solution is in that it is not sufficient to copy &lt;br&gt; *content* of the Microsoft.VC90.DebugCRT into the application directory. It &lt;br&gt; is necessary to copy there the whole folder as a *subdirectory*. &lt;br&gt; Thanks to &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.tech-archive.net/Archive/VisualStudio/microsoft.public.vstudio.general/2008-11/msg00109.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/25a19b1acca61629?show_docid=25a19b1acca61629</guid>
  <author>
  s...@no.mail
  (Martin Plechsmid)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2009 07:23:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: AppDomains and native DLLs</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/9a1dd94a8cc48210/4e3fa3a3bf7d627e?show_docid=4e3fa3a3bf7d627e</link>
  <description>
  oh gee, you already said what I did.... I was thinking of your statement in &lt;br&gt; terms of named kernel objects, but those are session-global, not &lt;br&gt; process-global. &lt;br&gt; __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4512 (20091015) __________ &lt;br&gt; The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/9a1dd94a8cc48210/4e3fa3a3bf7d627e?show_docid=4e3fa3a3bf7d627e</guid>
  <author>
  bvo...@newsgroup.nospam
  (Ben Voigt [C++ MVP])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2009 01:17:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: AppDomains and native DLLs</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/9a1dd94a8cc48210/a76b75d4b18da885?show_docid=a76b75d4b18da885</link>
  <description>
  And if the DLLs import another DLL that uses global data, you&#39;ll still end &lt;br&gt; up with data sharing across app-domains no matter what you do (short of &lt;br&gt; recompiling all dependencies with /clr and app-domain awareness). &lt;br&gt; __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4512 (20091015) __________
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/9a1dd94a8cc48210/a76b75d4b18da885?show_docid=a76b75d4b18da885</guid>
  <author>
  bvo...@newsgroup.nospam
  (Ben Voigt [C++ MVP])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2009 01:14:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - more info</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/179111a3378c15fd?show_docid=179111a3378c15fd</link>
  <description>
  xcopy deployment generally doesn&#39;t work for C++/CLI apps (this is expected &lt;br&gt; to change with VS2010). &lt;br&gt; There are some tweaks to the manifest needed to get app-local CRT working. &lt;br&gt; Google is your friend. &lt;br&gt; __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4512 (20091015) __________
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/179111a3378c15fd?show_docid=179111a3378c15fd</guid>
  <author>
  bvo...@newsgroup.nospam
  (Ben Voigt [C++ MVP])
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2009 01:11:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - NonDelayed screenshot</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/710be3389302da8f?show_docid=710be3389302da8f</link>
  <description>
  It might be, though I don&#39;t think it&#39;s the problem. At first, the release &lt;br&gt; version of the application is missing MSJAVA.DLL too, and the release &lt;br&gt; version works. At second, the dependency on MSJAVA.DLL is only delay-loaded, &lt;br&gt; which means - I think - that the DLL is loaded only when necessary. My &lt;br&gt; application does not use java. At third, I have MSJAVA.DLL neither on my
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/710be3389302da8f?show_docid=710be3389302da8f</guid>
  <author>
  s...@no.mail
  (Martin Plechsmid)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2009 13:08:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - NonDelayed screenshot</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/21c9ebafd680f697?show_docid=21c9ebafd680f697</link>
  <description>
  * Martin Plechsmid wrote, On 14-10-2009 10:28: &lt;br&gt; Looks like you&#39;re missing the J# Redist package on the machine. It&#39;s a &lt;br&gt; separate download.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/21c9ebafd680f697?show_docid=21c9ebafd680f697</guid>
  <author>
  jesse.houw...@newsgroup.nospam
  (Jesse Houwing)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2009 12:29:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - further info</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/093db9967bc6861c?show_docid=093db9967bc6861c</link>
  <description>
  I tried the same CLR HelloWorld program on a clean installation of Windows &lt;br&gt; Server 2003 R2 SP2 Standard x64 Edition. I installed .NET 2.0 SP1 (x64 &lt;br&gt; version) and VC9 redistributable packages (x86 version; release version is &lt;br&gt; installed, debug version of CRT is copied from VS2008). *Nothing* else is &lt;br&gt; installed.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/093db9967bc6861c?show_docid=093db9967bc6861c</guid>
  <author>
  s...@no.mail
  (Martin Plechsmid)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2009 11:30:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - more info</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/c3bfc19c7ee31c19?show_docid=c3bfc19c7ee31c19</link>
  <description>
  Yes. I have copied them in the directory with the CLR executable. When they &lt;br&gt; were missing, Dependency Walker showed that. &lt;br&gt; Martin.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/c3bfc19c7ee31c19?show_docid=c3bfc19c7ee31c19</guid>
  <author>
  s...@no.mail
  (Martin Plechsmid)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2009 09:25:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - more info</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/77d7640a7ba2fbfa?show_docid=77d7640a7ba2fbfa</link>
  <description>
  Not sure if I understood you correctly: you have those files present &lt;br&gt; and it still does not work?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/77d7640a7ba2fbfa?show_docid=77d7640a7ba2fbfa</guid>
  <author>
  mail_igno...@web.de
  (Immo Landwerth)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2009 09:17:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 32-bit CLR application on 64-bit system - more info</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/570cc16b6a6f1841?show_docid=570cc16b6a6f1841</link>
  <description>
  Instead of having there Microsoft.VC90.DebugCRT.dll I have there &lt;br&gt; Microsoft.VC90.DebugCRT.manife st and the 3 related DLLs (MSVCM90D.DLL, &lt;br&gt; MSVCP90D.DLL and MSVCR90D.DLL). They are in the x86 version, and I copied &lt;br&gt; them from the &amp;lt;VC9.0&amp;gt;\VC\redist\Debug folder. (The x64 version didn&#39;t work &lt;br&gt; as the exe is 32-bit.)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr/browse_thread/thread/8f58a4f8344e58e8/570cc16b6a6f1841?show_docid=570cc16b6a6f1841</guid>
  <author>
  s...@no.mail
  (Martin Plechsmid)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2009 09:08:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
