Message from discussion
Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <102c1a64-c792-46f5-95d0-202ce9fdbe3c@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:57:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.144.18 with SMTP id r18mr408776and.14.1200923839241; Mon,
21 Jan 2008 05:57:19 -0800 (PST)
X-IP: 83.67.125.137
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US;
rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Subject: Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
From: Tom Locke <tabla...@googlemail.com>
To: Low Pro <low-pro@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I hate to risk starting a my-framework-is-better-than-your-framework
thread, but I'd really like to here people's opinions on / experiences
with the merits of prototype + lowpro over other frameworks such as
JQuery that seem to be gaining some mind-share.
We've been bundling lowpro with Hobo for a while and are intending to
move towards "lowpro style" for all the client-side behaviour that
comes with Hobo.
At the same time I've always got half an eye on JQuery, and have been
getting increasingly tempted to at least give that option a try.
One thing that occurs to me is that I'd miss the nice rubyisms that I
get with prototype (e.g. little things like String#gsub)
|
