| |
Low Pro |
Wow, that would be awesome, I can't wait to give it a try. JQuery already -Matt On 1/25/08, Dan Webb <d...@danwebb.net> wrote: > On 1/21/08, Matt Aimonetti <mattaimone...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've considered doing this myself. Ive used both jquery and prototype > However, jquery is really compact, very well documented and does its > $('.date').attach(DatePicker, { opt1: 34 }); > Would do the job, I can even bring over the inheritance stuff...and > Cheers for bringing this up... > -- > aim: danwrong123
has livequery but it ain't as good as lowpro!
> > It would be awesome to port the low pro syntax to JQuery. Now the thing
> is,
> > low pro is just a tiny abstraction layer above proto, in theory we
> should be
> > able to port the same layer to JQuery.
> heavily in the past. The reason I like prototype over jquery is that
> prototype offers more general programming tools where as jquery is
> just about dealing with the DOM. Secondarily, in my experience, the
> chaining idiom in jquery tempts people into writing some pretty
> unreadable code.
> job well so I can see the attraction so 10 minutes spend writing
> behaviours on top of it would be well spent. Ill see what I can come
> up with. Something like:
> the DOM builder. I'll do it tomorrow morning if I have time.
> Dan Webb
> http://www.danwebb.net
> skype: danwrong