Message from discussion
Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
Received: by 10.35.14.4 with SMTP id r4mr15753405pyi.2.1201889755395;
Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <d...@danwebb.net>
Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.189])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v63si7189986pyh.2.2008.02.01.10.15.55;
Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 64.233.170.189 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of d...@danwebb.net) client-ip=64.233.170.189;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 64.233.170.189 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of d...@danwebb.net) smtp.mail=...@danwebb.net
Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id s28so527579rnb.8
for <low-pro@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.201.13 with SMTP id y13mr1440995ybf.100.1201889754930;
Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.181.7 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5b3e279f0802011015i1f4469bbj84152fb18fd550c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:15:54 +0000
From: "Dan Webb" <d...@danwebb.net>
To: low-pro@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
In-Reply-To: <20b2f44d-7b82-4796-87a0-6dda37350908@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <102c1a64-c792-46f5-95d0-202ce9fdbe3c@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
<5b3e279f0801280253l624c333avfc9f8d128f7055ff@mail.gmail.com>
<d667e999-d057-46a2-868f-236240f24d05@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
<5b3e279f0801280727r2a307962mf6955a96d12ca0bf@mail.gmail.com>
<f58d8dcb0801301555t268f7fa0gcc7438856abaea49@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801301631s159a4398hec1c474b1bf6f745@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801301646i209499anbf3be3790bc3163d@mail.gmail.com>
<706acb90-19c8-4dc1-a05d-bdb87d568484@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
<d23e9479-6432-4351-af7a-6938b8adfaf6@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
<20b2f44d-7b82-4796-87a0-6dda37350908@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
On 2/1/08, timothytoe <timothy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wow. MooTools selectors are fast!
Yeah? last time I looked there wasn't much in it at all. Since all
the libraries jumped in speed in that area its just simply not been a
problem for me anymore. More performance anywhere is good I suppose
but its not something I really think needs much more development in
libraries at this time.
--
Dan Webb
http://www.danwebb.net
aim: danwrong123
skype: danwrong
|
