|
|
Low Pro |
That's a point. I'll make it use livequery if its present although I'll see what I can put together. On 1/26/08, Matt Aimonetti <mattaimone...@gmail.com> wrote: > -Matt > On 1/25/08, Dan Webb <d...@danwebb.net> wrote: > > On 1/21/08, Matt Aimonetti <mattaimone...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've considered doing this myself. Ive used both jquery and prototype > > However, jquery is really compact, very well documented and does its > > $('.date').attach(DatePicker, { opt1: 34 }); > > Would do the job, I can even bring over the inheritance stuff...and > > Cheers for bringing this up... > > -- > > aim: danwrong123 aim: danwrong123
these days I don't really favour those kinds of solutions. If I need
to work with a changing DOM I use event delegation.
> Wow, that would be awesome, I can't wait to give it a try. JQuery already --
> has livequery but it ain't as good as lowpro!
> > > It would be awesome to port the low pro syntax to JQuery. Now the thing
> is,
> > > low pro is just a tiny abstraction layer above proto, in theory we
> should be
> > > able to port the same layer to JQuery.
> > heavily in the past. The reason I like prototype over jquery is that
> > prototype offers more general programming tools where as jquery is
> > just about dealing with the DOM. Secondarily, in my experience, the
> > chaining idiom in jquery tempts people into writing some pretty
> > unreadable code.
> > job well so I can see the attraction so 10 minutes spend writing
> > behaviours on top of it would be well spent. Ill see what I can come
> > up with. Something like:
> > the DOM builder. I'll do it tomorrow morning if I have time.
> > Dan Webb
> > http://www.danwebb.net
> > skype: danwrong
Dan Webb
http://www.danwebb.net
skype: danwrong