Message from discussion
Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <d667e999-d057-46a2-868f-236240f24d05@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.164.10 with SMTP id m10mr297818ane.3.1201533171676; Mon,
28 Jan 2008 07:12:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5b3e279f0801280253l624c333avfc9f8d128f7055ff@mail.gmail.com>
X-IP: 130.113.109.208
References: <102c1a64-c792-46f5-95d0-202ce9fdbe3c@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
<bb99361a0801211126k2df88416h68021d8a797c3f0b@mail.gmail.com>
<f58d8dcb0801211358w51dadccdgc838fb1a6abd11e6@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801251922g20060bfbxbf536db9cb41d802@mail.gmail.com>
<f58d8dcb0801251938r688da9fex9992160b1b1ff195@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801260204o7e8ecb37qd6c994c071274fad@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801260630i58a84ef2u336f161f17d78ab6@mail.gmail.com>
<7438eebe0801261609g59af8c07hbe6f6e59256e0550@mail.gmail.com>
<b10d3fec-14ec-4eda-a57c-c82af44cc998@c23g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
<5b3e279f0801280253l624c333avfc9f8d128f7055ff@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/523.10.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/523.10.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Subject: Re: Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
From: Peter <peter.kielt...@gmail.com>
To: Low Pro <low-pro@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> To be honest, Low Pro has become quite a compact piece of code so it
> would only take me another 30 mins or so but I'm not sure I'd be
> qualified to support code that I wouldn't use myself and it would be
> better ran by someone from the Mootools camp.
Right, that is understandable. However, my underlining objectives in
my applications are to achieve efficiency and performance, especially
over a browser executing JS where there are varying computers and
browsers. That usually lends itself to the people in charge of a
framework. Once I begin to adopt a framework and my applications
consume it, I hate having to port my code, so I always spend a lot of
time making a decision.. the hard part is to look ahead and consider
which framework will last.
Mootools has an interesting test suite comparing the various
frameworks: prototype, mootools and jquery right in your browser.
http://mootools.net/slickspeed/
These are older versions so I copied the test code and posted it on my
server with the latest versions of each framework: http://nulayer.com/~peter/jstest/
... I like jQuery, and I'd prefer to use it because of its adoption
and support, but from this small subset of a test, it does not perform
well at all. Reading the jQuery blog, they've taken on a developer to
optimize their code, I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up
with.
Regards,
Peter
|
