Message from discussion
Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
Received: by 10.35.14.4 with SMTP id r4mr4936279pyi.2.1201392545573;
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <graham.ash...@gmail.com>
Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.226])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v63si4414209pyh.2.2008.01.26.16.09.04;
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of graham.ash...@gmail.com designates 72.14.214.226 as permitted sender) client-ip=72.14.214.226;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of graham.ash...@gmail.com designates 72.14.214.226 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=graham.ash...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 28so803461hub.8
for <low-pro@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=O5aJMlB4H5Xb5xmncQ00rW4OC4/N+MtRglY/rc7GeNA=;
b=Q+1ZY++6ntqUEeZOjZ62p86QDJlGkrZ2lQQF/z9KAbaQGQTr4FB0Pp99JVQmDm/xN8Hgc6hZI35/rY8KR/Fx0YfD5fkJgEBE6KVouE685+pesQ5SUlt+VpDGsmkWw6Za45VawDfCHYMZDuYAcn8DExMHuqqtuth6x9bIqUUeKo4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=Kq4BZyrKi20XH1uzYMEiKl6JKZi8T/YUeH3aZLetoeFz62FnHc7JXNCcP7i+HPQtzJeo0RFzDvJQSy6DryuKm+CY14xdOXkavQ5mpDlWmqXonnSIj/CNcyTgjNu4flGzhJG6gVRiI2/XzmQamMPDd0fxvG3+gIIV3zNczzrdXkM=
Received: by 10.86.62.3 with SMTP id k3mr3505398fga.8.1201392544287;
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.86.79.8 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7438eebe0801261609g59af8c07hbe6f6e59256e0550@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:09:04 +0400
From: "Graham Ashton" <graham.ash...@gmail.com>
To: low-pro@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
In-Reply-To: <5b3e279f0801260630i58a84ef2u336f161f17d78...@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <102c1a64-c792-46f5-95d0-202ce9fdb...@j78g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
<bb99361a0801211126k2df88416h68021d8a797c3...@mail.gmail.com>
<f58d8dcb0801211358w51dadccdgc838fb1a6abd1...@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801251922g20060bfbxbf536db9cb41d...@mail.gmail.com>
<f58d8dcb0801251938r688da9fex9992160b1b1ff...@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801260204o7e8ecb37qd6c994c071274...@mail.gmail.com>
<5b3e279f0801260630i58a84ef2u336f161f17d78...@mail.gmail.com>
On 26/01/2008, Dan Webb <d...@danwebb.net> wrote:
>
> What do ya'll think? After sitting and coding it Im actually really
> pleased with how it turned out. It's much simpler than the Prototype
> implementation and fits jquery's style a lot more. I might defect :)
Oh feck. I've only just got to grips with prototype... ;-)
|
