|
|
Low Pro |
--T
On Feb 1, 10:15 am, "Dan Webb" <d...@danwebb.net> wrote:
> > Wow. MooTools selectors are fast!
> Yeah? last time I looked there wasn't much in it at all. Since all
> --
> aim: danwrong123
>>Since all the libraries jumped in speed in that area its just simply not been a problem for me anymore.
It's not a problem for me, either. Very little time is spent in the
selectors. I was just impressed. jQuery is way behind in 3 browsers.
Interestingly, it is much better in IE, which I suppose is where you
want to put the work, since IE is so slow.
> On 2/1/08, timothytoe <timothy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the libraries jumped in speed in that area its just simply not been a
> problem for me anymore. More performance anywhere is good I suppose
> but its not something I really think needs much more development in
> libraries at this time.
> Dan Webbhttp://www.danwebb.net
> skype: danwrong